Favorite team:New Orleans Saints 
Location:Da Parish
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:23590
Registered on:11/23/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

What do you mean "protected"? They still do today.

It is hilarious watching the groomer party pretend they actually care about this. If they can't get Trump, they don't care. It is quite obvious.

These are the same groomers who cheer when their judges release child rapists into the public to rape and kill again. They hold no moral high ground on any topic.

Not to mention illegals that are here committing these types of crimes. These sick fricks will literally send their foot soldiers out to die to protect those animals.


100%

Don’t forget to include all the illegal alien kids democrats “lost” during the Biden boarder invasion
quote:

TBoy


You and your leftist comrades protected pedophiles until you thought you could score political points. Your are just as guilty as the kid diddlers
Commie Clark is triggered, lol. Go cry somewhere else you limp wrist leftist puss
quote:

I voted for Trump twice


BUTTTTTTT

They are not sending their best seminar posters
quote:

nbcnews.com

quote:

aljazeera.com

quote:

ms.now


Well, this settles it based on information from the totally unbiased leftwing media
We all know you are Marxist scum, Commie Clark. I’d be embarrassed if I was a white guy voting for democrats too. Commie Clark, the Harris Bro….who has the nerve to call other posters dumbass while voting for Harris and Biden. What a puss. lol
quote:

Trump can’t do enough good things to get us to forget he is a rapist ..


See, this is why no one takes you leftist serious when you say you care about getting justice for the victims in the Epstein files. What you really care about is smearing Trump and using the victims as props to achieve tha goal.
Commie Clark folks!!

Remember; this leftist voted for Biden and Hillary, lol. What a fig!!
quote:

Nice of Shaq to donate his old dining room to the museum


Yao Ming had a restaurant in Houston that my grandfather took us too. They had a chair there that he would sit in when he came there. It was ridiculously big and felt like one of those oversized beach chairs you’d see in Destin or somewhere.
quote:

Went to LSU and is friends with several posters here. Was around Tigerland early 2000’s.


Went to Southeastern too
No, I don’t think it’s the same. What you posted, I believe, is a policy critique which is different than what Kelley said..

Like I said earlier… if you aren’t versed on the UCMJ, it’s difficult to make a legal distinction. That’s why this should be left to the military courts.

Do you agree or disagree that this should be left to the military courts to decide whether he broke a military oath and not civilian courts?
quote:

This is what you think Kelly violated?


Personally, I think he did violate his oath by using contemptuous words against the chain of command. He tried to be cute but knew what he was doing when he made that statement. But that isn’t my or a civilian judge’s ruling to make. Leave it to the military to make that determination and handle any potential discipline or exoneration.
quote:

That's not wealthy. It's decent in many areas of this country, but it's not much for NYC. But they vote dem, so TS


I thought the same thing. That’s middle class in most areas of the country.
quote:

What specific order did Kelly encourage them to disobey?


I’m not going to opine on something I don’t know about, especially when discussing what a military officers oath entails.. What I do know is that officers are held to a different standard than enlisted service members and it’s up to a military judge to determine if that officer violated their oath and not for a civilian judge to make that ruling.
quote:

Does that congressperson lose a first amendment right o speak out on an issue of national importance the moment they leave the Capitol? Can they express their views back home in their district to their constituents?


I think there is a difference in discussing or criticizing policy differences vs encouraging military members to disobey orders or command. Especially if it’s coming from an officer because they are held to a different standard within the military. That being said, I was enlisted soldier and not an officer so I’m not totally sure to be honest

At the end of the day, this is for a military judge to rule on if he violated a military oath and not a civilian judge
quote:

If a military veteran is a member of Congress and makes a speech against some foreign military action ordered by POTUS, can the SecDef court martial him for eroding good order?


I would assume if it’s under their official capacity, they are protected by the speech and debate clause.

But that’s not what happened here