
SidewalkDawg
| Favorite team: | Georgia |
| Location: | Chair |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 10198 |
| Registered on: | 11/20/2012 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Musk: “Long term, A.I. is going to be in charge, to be totally frank, not humans."
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 11/10/25 at 10:49 am to Powerman
quote:
Their advantage is on the energy side of the equation
We might not have the energy infrastructure to build out our compute as fast as we would like
So then why the laugh?
China's energy infrastructure is extremely significant and potentially a decisive bottleneck. They keep shitting out power plants while we are worried about the affect it might have on the population of frogs 50 miles away.
re: Musk: “Long term, A.I. is going to be in charge, to be totally frank, not humans."
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 11/10/25 at 10:39 am to Powerman
quote:
To fall behind who? China?
You laugh, but China has some real advantages here.
re: Musk: “Long term, A.I. is going to be in charge, to be totally frank, not humans."
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 11/10/25 at 10:33 am to Bham4Tide
quote:
Those who do the regulating are the ones that will choose how it works - and doesn’t work. Do you really want that?
There is no regulating this. To regulate means to fall behind.
re: Musk: “Long term, A.I. is going to be in charge, to be totally frank, not humans."
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 11/10/25 at 10:16 am to lsu13lsu
quote:
Anyone else scared that Sam Altman is going to be in charge of it?
I think people consistently misunderstand what AI is, what it's capable of, and what possible outcomes our future holds. As it stands there are 2 futures ahead of us.
1. Sentience with AI is impossible. There is something special about organic life. Call it a soul - maybe it's the substrate. Who knows. AI will continue to run as it does today within limited service of humanity.
2. Sentience with AI is possible. This means we have to solve the alignment problem. How do you align AI with the goals of Humanity? Can you even do it? If sentience is possible, so is self-improvement, so is superintelligence. With superintelligence all bets are off. We have no hope of containing or controlling it.
Right now, all serious safety experts in the field of AI are working on the alignment problem. Simultaneously, China, USA, Israel, Europe, who knows how many others are ALL pushing advances through for AI and they are ALL hoping that we solve the alignment problem before it's too late.
That's it. That's the situation. You can choose to believe it or not. But this problem is highly likely to bite us in the arse in our lifetimes whether you disregard it or not.
re: Musk: “Long term, A.I. is going to be in charge, to be totally frank, not humans."
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 11/10/25 at 9:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
LINK? This seems like a strawman.
Google AI in landmark victory over Go grandmaster
Here's just one link - and the associated quote. It was widely discussed how ahead of it's time this development was, not at all controversial:
quote:
It’s the first such victory for a computer program, and it came a decade before anyone expected it. As recently as 2014, Rémi Coulom, developer of the previous leading Go game AI, Crazy Stone, had predicted that it would take 10 more years for a machine to win against a top-rated human player without a handicap.
re: Musk: “Long term, A.I. is going to be in charge, to be totally frank, not humans."
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 11/10/25 at 9:48 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Innovation is way beyond solving games with set rules.
I said it "Depends on what you define as innovation"
The point was that no one thought AI could that yet either. It's consistently met or broken our expectations.
My only point in all of this is that we should not take it likely and just assume that it has limits. We don't know shite about our own consciousness and we are pushing forward. If there is even a 5% chance that what we are doing results in Superintelligent AI we should all be concerned.
re: Musk: “Long term, A.I. is going to be in charge, to be totally frank, not humans."
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 11/10/25 at 9:39 am to lsu777
quote:
so i cant walk over an flip the fricking breaker now? i cant cut the internet cable? i cant go shoot the damn transformer to stop flow of electricity?
Right now, absolutely. But guess what? No one is doing that. They are pushing forward at lightspeed so they can be the first. It's through Hubris that we will end up destroying ourselves if we aren't careful.
re: Musk: “Long term, A.I. is going to be in charge, to be totally frank, not humans."
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 11/10/25 at 9:33 am to lsu777
quote:
that in and of itself means we are and will always be in charge.
This is hubris I can't wrap my head around. IF (and that's a big IF) AI gains sentience, we aren't going to know. In fact, it's highly likely to continue to assist us in innovating technologies, like new frontiers in energy generation, until it's at a point where it is in control.
This isn't going to happen like it does in the movies. AI will cooperate until it doesn't need to and when that happens, it's already too late.
re: Musk: “Long term, A.I. is going to be in charge, to be totally frank, not humans."
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 11/10/25 at 8:57 am to 4cubbies
quote:
The very nature of AI makes it incapable of innovation.
That depends entirely on how you define innovation.
AlphaGO defeated the world GO champion with the now infamous "Move 37". A move which had never been used before in Go. It Innovated this move to defeat him. It's "programmers" didn't come up with Move 37. This was in 2015. AI today is not as narrow as it was then.
re: Musk: “Long term, A.I. is going to be in charge, to be totally frank, not humans."
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 11/10/25 at 8:52 am to Padme
quote:
AI is marketed as a sci-fi fantasy come true. All it is is the ability to navigate more and more data. Yes it can piece the puzzle faster than any one human can. So speed is its main quality above humanity. But it can never “think” above the data it’s given, which is the dream of so many who think humans can create life. Sorry, that ain’t happening
You may be right. You also may be wrong. I would err on the side of caution with this one.
re: Musk: “Long term, A.I. is going to be in charge, to be totally frank, not humans."
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 11/10/25 at 8:47 am to Decatur
quote:
We still don’t understand the human brain enough to make AI anything close to resembling it.
It doesn't have to exactly resemble the human brain. Only mimic it. We are creating a system that learns and processes information similar to how a child learns about the world around them.
re: Musk: “Long term, A.I. is going to be in charge, to be totally frank, not humans."
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 11/10/25 at 8:41 am to SlowFlowPro
AI as an existential threat is very very real.
It's more real than any Nuclear threat during the height of the cold war.
That doesn't mean it's a foregone conclusion, and it hinges on a lot of assumptions about the nature of consciousness.
Our best guess is that sentience and will arise out of systems that are complex enough - the human brain has ~86 billion neurons and the next most complex brain on Earth is a chimp with ~28 billion neurons. If that's true, we simply need to keep on the current path we are on and AI will become super intelligent. After that we are merely observers of the future AI will craft.
It's more real than any Nuclear threat during the height of the cold war.
That doesn't mean it's a foregone conclusion, and it hinges on a lot of assumptions about the nature of consciousness.
Our best guess is that sentience and will arise out of systems that are complex enough - the human brain has ~86 billion neurons and the next most complex brain on Earth is a chimp with ~28 billion neurons. If that's true, we simply need to keep on the current path we are on and AI will become super intelligent. After that we are merely observers of the future AI will craft.
re: Bill Gates — Climate change will not lead to demise of humanity, it’s time to end the doom
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 10/28/25 at 9:25 am to loogaroo
Now is the time to pay attention to the next thing that is going to end civilization as we know it.
If even Bill Gates is saying climate change is bust. They won't waste time on coming up with a new way to steal and control all of us. I look forward to more "Trust the Science" discussions in the near future.
If even Bill Gates is saying climate change is bust. They won't waste time on coming up with a new way to steal and control all of us. I look forward to more "Trust the Science" discussions in the near future.
re: Time to Nuke the Filibuster
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 10/27/25 at 2:14 pm to Boss13
quote:
A 60 vote majority is in place to prevent democratic tyranny against a minority party.
I say end it. The government being able to get things done has always been the problem. With the Filibuster ended, whoever is in power will get to pass what they want and then the other side can repeal it when they have power.
This "let's get along, i'll scratch your back and you scratch mine" is exactly what got us into this mess to begin with.
re: East Wing of the White House as "the heart" of America.
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 10/27/25 at 11:59 am to Jbird
The way they are acting about the East wing makes me wonder what kind of shite they had hidden in the walls.
re: New Ballroom Name Ideas
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 10/23/25 at 9:05 am to ConservativeBamaFan
I think he should do this:


re: Breaking: judge in Illinois rules that fencing must come down at ice facility
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 10/10/25 at 9:48 am to MidWestGuy
quote:
That *might* actually be a legitimate legal stance.
No, it's not legitimate. ICE has authority under the Homeland Security Act to protect it's facilities, and this includes encroachment onto public sidewalks or streets if the situation is warranted.
re: Breaking: judge in Illinois rules that fencing must come down at ice facility
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 10/10/25 at 9:34 am to HubbaBubba

re: Dem are winning the shutdown fight
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 10/10/25 at 9:14 am to Penrod
quote:
Early returns on polling are a little worrying for Republicans, but much of that could be fake news from MSM. It will become clearer in another week or so.
Is there a single poll that shows Democrats have the majority of the blame? I haven't been able to find one.
re: Dem are winning the shutdown fight
Posted by SidewalkDawg on 10/10/25 at 9:09 am to LuckyTiger
quote:
Most polling fwiw
Yep, I've seen a ton of polls that are blaming Republicans. Not that anyone believes polling anymore. So all we are really left with is "Feelings".
Popular
0












