DocSavage

This, including forensic investigation into the judges financial dealing, stock trades, offshore accounts etc.

I feel it in my plums. These Judges that rule to block EOs do so with no concern over any backlash. The only thing that would make these insufferable prick's confident in throwing down these political gauntlets is money, lots and lots of money.

Think Judge Smalls in Caddy Shack with his little boat and his club membership. Money makes his world go round and anyone's opinion of him doesn't matter in that world of multi millionaire luxury and influence.

Merry Christmas!

The V.P. should always be the Senate leader for their party whether majority or minority. IMHO.

A poetic play on victor, victorious and historic

AI Overview

"Victoric" means victorious or having won a contest, especially one that requires physical strength or skills. For example, you might call someone the victor if they won a difficult competition or battle.

William Shakespeare is credited with the invention or introduction of over 1,700 words that are still used in English today. William Shakespeare used more than 20,000 words in his plays and poems, and his works provide the first recorded use of over 1,700 words in the English language.

Maybe I just invented another.

They know they are the minority. They are shipping in voters from everywhere to attempt to change that, but they can't import enough foreigners to gain a majority. The only way they win is through gaming the system in cahoots with corrupt RINOs. Trump has exposed the game. If voting is cleaned up, they might never win another national election.

The difference between R and D is that Rs accept the rule of law even when we suspect shenanigans. We just pick up our campaign signs and start working on the next election. Rs know they are the majority and have faith in the eventual integrity of the election process. Ds on the other hand, attempt assassination and pass laws that allow them to harvest ballots, when they lose they burn cities, and riot, they use corrupt officials to block any actions that threaten their positions through injunctions, impeachment, and lawfare.

Trump is not the "Nazi", you are if you vote R. They live in complete terror of having to live in a society governed by R. If they see no hope of continuing to game the system and hanging on to power they are willing to burn it all down.

If abortion isn't freely available everywhere in their hearts they are oppressed.

If alternative lifestyles aren't taught and encouraged in elementary classrooms in their belief structure emotional and physical holocaust is being practiced.

Christianity must be abolished in their world view.

Requiring work for income is inhumane and cruel.

Earning a profit from selling goods and services to others is evil.

Free speech is subversive and should be regulated.

They are lost in these beliefs, unable to be moved, and unwilling to coexist with anyone that disagrees.

If they ever lose hope of holding power, they will attempt to revolt and burn it all down.

You have the original intent wrong.

Sinners walk stand and sit in sin, or in other words their life is consumed by their sin. Instead of following their example, make your life be consumed with focusing and meditating on God's Law. Do this and and you will be blessed.

In

Everyone involved in the detail that day, from planning to on site duty should be treated as a suspect until they are exonerated. Think of a missing wife case, where the husband is automatically a suspect until he is cleared.

This means all of their communications, scoured, all data tracking, location tracking retrieved, undergo lie detector depositions and be isolated from outside contact while questioning occurs of all involved.

There are many examples of women being prophets, disciples, apostles and missionaries and even preaching throughout the Bible.

Apparently some friction occurred between the men and women in the Corinth church.

Paul's instructions for the church in Corinth was related to the scriptural teaching that the man is head of the household just as Jesus is head of the church. This was being applied by Paul in the context of families worshipping together as a congregation in Corinth.

The place of leadership in the marriage is the man's. Men were probably objecting to the idea of women teaching men in their communal worship services and wanted clarification from Paul.

(Historical Contex)

In the early church women and men were understood to be equally inspired by the Holy Spirit and filled with His discernment, and gifts to witness and teach, but the marriage relationship required that the man be placed forward in leadership and the woman keep her questions, knowledge, or comments for private counsel with her husband. The Man would be required to be open to her counsel and teaching in private and diligent in teaching her as well so they lived as equals in their marriage. Women and men who were unmarried would be led by married members of the same sex in the same way.

(Modern Context)

Some Baptist churches have no one to assume the pastor position and can't afford to pay someone enough to get them to commit to real long term leadership. If there are no men called to preach and teach in that congregation, but there are women knowledgeable in scripture and gifted with teaching then allowing a woman to preach is logical and not a problem. A woman leading a church as a pastor or preaching or teaching to a mixed crowd of married men and women has the same inspiration and witness as any man, however the men, and especially her husband, if he is a member, has the prerogative to allow her to occupy that position of leadership or not.

A woman has the same responsibility and requirements as a man in the position of preacher/teacher that scripture lays out, (married, undivorced, without moral reproach, etc.), but if a suitable man is sent by God to lead the congregation, then a woman who is truly scripturally inspired would humbly step back into her role as a Christian wife.

Unfortunately, this is not the case for most situations where a Baptist church has a woman pastor. In my experience many of these women reject God's delineated role for them in their marriage and their church. They would be apoplectic at the thought of stepping back for a man to assume their role. This is evidence against them and proof that the spirit that inspires them is not the Holy Spirit.

That is the crucial element.

Whoever is in a position of leadership in a church has to be completely submitted to God's will. We all fall short, so what I mean by submitted is to not be willfully opposed to any of God's teachings.


A woman preaching in the role of missionary or evangelist is not the same situation as in Corinth. It may occur in a church setting, but the congregation is not the local church family made up of married couples in that community, but is a group of random individuals that has gathered together specifically to hear her message. What she teaches is to be qualified through scripture by the individual that is listening just as when a man preaches in this role.