Junky

Lucky, could have been pass interference too

quote:

---

We should have just built those buildings back just like they were. No bugger FU to the terrorists.

---

I agree, but I believe the biggest reason they didn’t was they couldn’t lease that much office space again, so the buildings wouldn’t make money. Even the current building was having difficulty filling out the lease space.

I fully expect lsu to win handily next weekend, but don’t act like tech didn’t go into tiger stadium last time and had the game close at 24-20 at one point in the game, then the matchup before that, went into halftime leading lsu…

That’s why you go and get a guy like him. He’s special.

How’s the recoil on that bad boy?

Even Reagan told Thatcher “good luck” and that was during the “special relationship”.

Now? Britain can go ahead and try and defend it. Then Americans can laugh as the British get lost on their way down there.

If they set off a nuke over it, I’d think that’s serious ground for sanctions.

Where do they come up with these ideas? I couldn’t be hammered drunk and come up with something to his ludicrous.

quote:

---

What the frick do you know about honor?

---

I guess we should just let Japan have the Philippines again then, since they did such a bang up job in the 40’s.

quote:

---

She was one of the main ones parroting the 100% bullshite lie that "125 year olds are still receiving social security!!!" during the DOGE mess.

---

Either provide a link to her post or actually own up you’re misconstruing and confusing yourself. She did not originate or push a “125-year-olds are cashing checks” post of her own. She distinguished death-flag records from payment rolls, while also citing Musk’s claim that some 150-year-olds were receiving checks. That is not the same as her asserting that listing in the database meant they were being paid.

You probably glazed over a later response of her’s:

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

It’s not QE.

---

It absolutely is not and you’re correct to make the distinction.

Stout is right that the buybacks are a deliberate effort to support/suppress long yields and that dismissing them as pure non-QE “liquidity” underplays the policy intent and market perception. He is imprecise if they treat it as equivalent to Fed QE money-printing. It is a real but limited debt-management tool being used more forcefully; the bigger problems of deficits, debt stock, and interest costs remain.

Stout is a great poster who has the eye over the target. The only problem, tech could, could, go on a boom like we’ve never seen before. We are on a frontier, space privatization will be a huge boom. Once we start mining asteroids…..our grandkids could very well be doing that.