
voodoodawg
Favorite team: | USA ![]() |
Location: | MAGA |
Biography: | |
Interests: | |
Occupation: | |
Number of Posts: | 692 |
Registered on: | 9/21/2012 |
Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Notable Epstein Accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre Dies by "Suicide"
Posted by voodoodawg on 4/25/25 at 9:47 pm
Witness protection maybe. It's all grumbling
re: The tariffs will be fine
Posted by voodoodawg on 4/2/25 at 9:41 pm
This is a reset. Yes its painful...going the same direction will descend us into worse. :usa:
re: Why does the fed still fund so much money to universities?
Posted by voodoodawg on 3/21/25 at 9:11 am
It takes money to indoctrinate our youth and to keep the grift going
re: Did Zelensky already sign mineral rights deal with UK
Posted by voodoodawg on 3/2/25 at 9:35 pm
Here is a summary from Grok
Thanks for the link! The video you shared is titled "Scott Ritter: Ukraine’s LAST GASP as Putin Closes In, West Faces Total Defeat," uploaded by Danny Deraney on February 15, 2025. It’s an hour and 42 minutes long, and since you don’t have time to sift through it, I’ve done some digging to see if it connects to the Ukraine-UK mineral rights question.
Based on a transcript scan and related chatter, Scott Ritter—a former UN weapons inspector—spends this interview discussing Ukraine’s military and strategic situation, Russia’s advances, and Western involvement. Around the timestamp you flagged (13:02, or 782 seconds), he’s mid-discussion about Ukraine’s collapsing frontline and the West’s miscalculations, not specifically mineral rights. However, later in the video—roughly around the 45:00 mark—he touches on economic motivations, mentioning how Western powers, including the UK, might be eyeing Ukraine’s resources as part of their long-term stakes. He doesn’t explicitly say “mineral rights were signed over to the UK on January 16, 2025,” but he implies that deals like the UK’s “100-year partnership” (which we know was announced that month) could be less about altruism and more about securing economic leverage, including access to Ukraine’s critical minerals.
Posts on X and some web commentary align with this angle, claiming the UK deal involves mineral rights and port control, though hard evidence remains thin. The UK government’s official line sticks to vague terms like “partnership” and “investment,” with £36 million tied to energy and minerals, but no public contract spells out ownership. Ritter’s take seems to lean on this speculation, framing it as part of a broader Western scramble to lock in Ukraine’s assets before Russia’s gains render them moot.
So, does the video confirm the mineral rights transfer? Not directly—it’s more Ritter riffing on geopolitics with a cynical nod to resource grabs. If it’s stirring media buzz, it could be amplifying those X posts suggesting a deeper deal, but it’s light on specifics. Happy to dig further if you’ve got a hunch about what else might be buried in there—what’s your next move?
Thanks for the link! The video you shared is titled "Scott Ritter: Ukraine’s LAST GASP as Putin Closes In, West Faces Total Defeat," uploaded by Danny Deraney on February 15, 2025. It’s an hour and 42 minutes long, and since you don’t have time to sift through it, I’ve done some digging to see if it connects to the Ukraine-UK mineral rights question.
Based on a transcript scan and related chatter, Scott Ritter—a former UN weapons inspector—spends this interview discussing Ukraine’s military and strategic situation, Russia’s advances, and Western involvement. Around the timestamp you flagged (13:02, or 782 seconds), he’s mid-discussion about Ukraine’s collapsing frontline and the West’s miscalculations, not specifically mineral rights. However, later in the video—roughly around the 45:00 mark—he touches on economic motivations, mentioning how Western powers, including the UK, might be eyeing Ukraine’s resources as part of their long-term stakes. He doesn’t explicitly say “mineral rights were signed over to the UK on January 16, 2025,” but he implies that deals like the UK’s “100-year partnership” (which we know was announced that month) could be less about altruism and more about securing economic leverage, including access to Ukraine’s critical minerals.
Posts on X and some web commentary align with this angle, claiming the UK deal involves mineral rights and port control, though hard evidence remains thin. The UK government’s official line sticks to vague terms like “partnership” and “investment,” with £36 million tied to energy and minerals, but no public contract spells out ownership. Ritter’s take seems to lean on this speculation, framing it as part of a broader Western scramble to lock in Ukraine’s assets before Russia’s gains render them moot.
So, does the video confirm the mineral rights transfer? Not directly—it’s more Ritter riffing on geopolitics with a cynical nod to resource grabs. If it’s stirring media buzz, it could be amplifying those X posts suggesting a deeper deal, but it’s light on specifics. Happy to dig further if you’ve got a hunch about what else might be buried in there—what’s your next move?
re: I think we’re naive to believe that the geopolitical game is being played out publicly.
Posted by voodoodawg on 3/1/25 at 9:55 pm
quote:
quote:
I didn’t say that I had any answers. We’re not supposed to.
So you just say random shite?
Is your mind so closed and lazy that you can't entertain that his idea might have some merit? Everything ive seen in the last month, seems like lots of exposure to things hidden, maybe this show in the Oval Office was in fact somewhat planned for. There are reports that Z had conference calls with Nulan day of. Just day's before Nulan had her security clearance pulled..is that a coincidence? Do you honestly think Trump is flying by the seat of his pants here?
re: Jesse Watters Just Asked Bondi Why She Hasn’t Released The Epstein Files
Posted by voodoodawg on 2/26/25 at 10:14 pm
Critical thinking needed which seems to allude some posters here. This admin has to preserve our civility to this point. It won't take much to start pushing this in a direction we can't recover from. Most posters here know in general that people did some bad things, they want justice right now. The other group understands in general, the finer details of the rot, and if it was all uprooted at once, then we have collapse.
re: They knew, but they kept on injecting kids anyway…
Posted by voodoodawg on 2/25/25 at 9:01 pm
We fricking told people to think long and hard about getting this stuff..sad
re: I believe the Trump/Elon relationship goes back much further. I think Elon is Q.
Posted by voodoodawg on 2/18/25 at 9:32 pm
At some point people here are going to have to seriously consider that Q was not a larp.
Again, its time to bring back THE thread. Chickenshits has no balls
Again, its time to bring back THE thread. Chickenshits has no balls
The Theory of Everything or 2.0
Posted by voodoodawg on 2/5/25 at 9:30 pm
Bring it back or lets just start it here
Upvote away
Upvote away
re: Remember when "conservatives" cheered Bush invading Iraq?
Posted by voodoodawg on 2/4/25 at 10:16 pm
quote:
remember. All the baws of 2003 were cheering as W invaded and were saying how wonderful the new "free" Iraq would be.
Then it all collapsed. And all the baws claimed they were never for the war to begin with.
Fast forward to 2025. America "taking over" Gaza may be the stupidest thing I have ever heard of. I voted for Trump 3 times because he promised to keep us out of wars in the middle east.
There is no way this ends well. Muslims will never tolerate western countries owning any of their land. Not ever.
Nor will they accept any of the Gazans to immigrate to their lands.
I hope there is some way congress can block this. Otherwise the term quagmire wont do this mess justice.
That's the whole point. This is kicking the hornets nest to see what comes out. This will force all sorts of talks and negotiations
re: The Pilots name must be released ASAP
Posted by voodoodawg on 1/31/25 at 11:13 pm
quote:
I think it should be released also, but what Trump has done in a bit under 2 weeks, he gets some leeway. Got to trust him.
Trump is going to have to handle this very carefully, optics
re: FBI purge: All Six FBI Executive Assistant Directors and 25 Special Agents in Charge Out
Posted by voodoodawg on 1/31/25 at 10:59 pm
quote:
FBI purge: All Six FBI Executive Assistant Directors and 25 Special Agents in Charge Out
SloaneRanger
And apparently all the lawyers in the DC US Attorney’s office who were involved in Jan. 6 cases were axed.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
re: Trump Envoy Grenell Secures Release of 6 Hostages from Venezuela
Posted by voodoodawg on 1/31/25 at 10:27 pm
quote:
We’re probably going to find out that there are a lot of US hostages taken in the last 4 years that we didn’t hear about.
I think it was last week i saw something about some in Afghanistan and Rubio was working on it
re: We need that thread of everything back...it's time
Posted by voodoodawg on 1/19/25 at 11:08 pm
Seriously Chicken, you scared?
We need that thread of everything back...it's time
Posted by voodoodawg on 1/19/25 at 10:31 pm
(No Message)
re: The new Kamala is a true test of her commitment to her own context! She did it!!
Posted by voodoodawg on 12/17/24 at 10:31 pm
Yes she's ridiculous, but there are lot of crazies out there that are rolling up their sleeves...they just go away
re: Trigger warning for the deadbeat fatties on this board
Posted by voodoodawg on 12/12/24 at 9:26 pm
The fatties will find the big loopholes to jump through
re: Can we win the NC with Stockton
Posted by voodoodawg on 12/8/24 at 12:08 am
I know Kirby said he was fine..but that was a nasty hit...he seemed ok post game interviews but adrenaline is a hellva drug...
What if Gunner is concussed? Next man up?
What if Gunner is concussed? Next man up?
re: A special thanks to God for saving Trump and saving our nation!
Posted by voodoodawg on 11/27/24 at 9:25 pm
We all still have work to do at our local levels, the rot runs deep in our own communities, time dig in clean it out
re: Pam Bondi nominated to replace Gaetz as Attorney General
Posted by voodoodawg on 11/21/24 at 9:55 pm
quote:
quote:
The good news is she’ll now be a shoe in.
Exactly.
Anyone who doesn’t think this was all part of the plan hasn’t been paying close enough attention to Donald Trump.
It’s delicious.
Theres 25 dv's on this...at least 25 people here obviously don't..they missed that behind the scenes of trump campaign. Gatez has been right there the whole time..yuuugeee headfake
Popular