Onyx Aggie

Economy/Business:

1. Alabama
2. Louisiana
3. Mississippi

Geography:

1. Alabama
2. Mississippi
3. Louisiana

Education:

1. Mississippi
2. Alabama
3. Louisiana

Shittiest Capital:

1. Mississippi
2. Louisiana
3. Alabama

Food:

1. Louisiana
2. Mississippi
3. Alabama

Least Culcha:

1. Alabama
2. Louisiana
3. Mississippi

Areas I would personally live in by state:

1. Alabama: Gulf Shores/Fairhope, possibly a mountainous area I haven't visited yet
2. Mississippi: Coast, excluding Waveland and Pascagoula
3. Louisiana: Nada

quote:

---

Makes you wonder if these tools might becoming too powerful.

Is this just a cyber security issue?

---

GPT 5.6 is not the first. Access to Fable 5 is currently completely blocked as well. My guess was the same, it is too powerful, or has some capability that the government views as a security risk.

quote:

---

You must have been in the navy a long time ago

---

Yes, 90-96

quote:

---

I don't wanna grow up!!!!

---

We've found the Toys R Us kid!

quote:

---

“Screwing with” not screwing in retard.

---

OK, that is the first legit criticism of my post. I honestly only skimmed the headline and did not read the X post or watch the video! So I deserve that! :lol: :cheers:

When I was in the Navy, I banged chicks in an elevator at Universal Studios and on the swan boats in Lake Eola.

After college, I even had someone open the stall door in the unisex bathroom at Club One in Dallas while two chicks were giving me head, but I can't imagine being dumb enough to try to pull that off on government property in the most monitored city in the country.


ETA: To the downvoters and naysayers. First, I have no need to make shite up to seem cool on the internet. All of those things happened. Second, were you all good choir boys growing up that never did anything risky or less than well thought out? Especially if you were in the military or college at the times. I'm sure you were all virgins until you got married to your high school sweetheart and only frick missionary style.

quote:

---

My family is filled with military members. They did it to serve their country. They also did it for school loans, job opportunities afterwards, benefits for their family; they got paid, they were able to own stocks.

We need some realism in this thread. Theres a ton of middle ground between obvious insider trading and only wanting people who are either already poor or willing to sacrafice their assets fairly earned beforehand.

Again for the 10th time, this comes up in the private sector alot. We have tried and true methods. As with most things, government simply needs to look at the private sector and copy what works. The wheel does not, in fact, need to be reinvented.

---

I'm not understanding the pushback you are getting on this. They may have existed when our country was founded, but there is just no giant pool of intelligent, well educated men willing to put country above all else, even if it drives them to poverty type men from which to pull our leaders.

You have to be able to draw from the best and brightest. These guys are likely already rich or on their way to becoming so. Place strict, publicly auditable controls on them to minimize the shady shite.

Otherwise, you only draw people seeking power and wealth, with low scrupples as to how to obtain them.

quote:

---

The Democrats who ran congress didn’t do anything either. Why? Because both parties have/had a few members who are sensible enough to understand that the critical judicial institutions should not be undermined.

---

Relying on the sensibility of politicians, especially Dem politicians, to keep restrained, is lunacy.

The Reps are feckless. The Dems are ruthless, any means necessary types. You think they will allow a member of their own party with a minority view to stop their plans, laughable.

Keeping the Judiciary in line does not translate to some wholesale change or abandonment of constitutional principles. It is part of the Legislature's constitutional responsibilities.

A good start would be to prevent District Judges from issuing wholesale, nationwide injunctions. They should be limited to the district they are a part of. If your choice is to continue to allow them, Congress could also make it a requirement that any nationwide injunction issued below the SCOUTUS level, should be immediately subject to review by a multiple judge panel at a higher level prior to implementation.

Neither breaks the constitution, but both have a significant effect of curtailing judicial activism.

quote:

---

Birthright citizenship isn't being framed correctly. In my mind it should be that there is no constitutional right for the parents. Sure your kid might be a citizen but they can come back when 18. Until then, see you later. Having a kid doesn't mean you get to milk the system forever. No thank you.

---

I don't even want to throw them that bone, frick the whole lot of them.

These frickers truly have never met a tax they don't like (other than pretending to be concerned about taxing the poor). The want ALL of your money so they can distribute it as they see fit. You and everything you have belongs to the state.

frick them with a red hot poker.

quote:

---

Refreshing thing thinking about the Clinton and Obama children. They haven’t grifted and aren’t out there trying launch clothing lines or phones or take over islands and whatnot.

---

That may be true of the Obama girls, I honestly have zero idea what they are doing these days, but it is laughable when discussing Chelsea. Her entire adult life has been one giant nepotism driven, power brokerage grift just like Hunter Biden, with less drugs and sex.