BooBaDoo

This has been implemented at at least one private college in central Florida. The chosen faculty members go through a thorough selection process, and are highly trained for their specific mission. They consist of professors, administrators, and staff members.

Not every employee carries a firearm, only those in the program.

The ones who carry firearms are kept strictly confidential, and they carry concealed. Students have no idea who they are. The program, however, is not confidential. In fact, it’s advertised.

There are some similar programs in Texas. The concept is simple: train volunteer faculty members, but keep their identities secret. Advertise the program. Simple deterrent. These shooters hit soft targets for a reason...lack of resistance. A school advertising a covertly-armed staff presents the resistance that these shooters fear.

...for banned firearms.

Currently, there are several cities in the U.S. that have declared themselves “sanctuary cities”, and refuse to follow Federal Law as it relates to ILLEGAL immigration. They even go so far as to obstruct Federal agencies in their desire to protect those who have violated Federal law. The media seems to praise the actions of these municipalities.

Hypothetically, if we ever got to a place of having a Federal firearms ban (either a partial ban of certain types of firearms or a full ban/confiscation), what would the board’s reaction be to certain cities or states declaring themselves as firearms sanctuary cities, thereby refusing to recognize said ban? How would the media react? Would democrats still feel the same about sanctuaries from Federal law?

Just throwing it out there.

I'm in Winter Haven. Looks like the worst may be past us. Lost power at 7pm. My roof is torn apart. Trees down everywhere. We are safe, so I'm thankful.

I guess that's where my frustration comes from. Other teams field young QB's and let them develop. Look at Georgia last year. They took some lumps, but that's how you get better. Taking Franks out was the worst possible thing to do last night, in my opinion. Everyone is blaming the OL, and they deserve some criticism, but good coaches make adjustments. Ours don't.

You can't win with scared money. Mac and Nuss coach scared, and it infects the team.

Florida hired two former Alabama offensive coordinators to run the team/offense. They were both successful at Alabama because of superior talent. Nuss failed at Michigan when the talent leveled out. Mac was successful at Colorado State for one year. Neither came make in game adjustments, and they consistently fail to get the ball to playmakers.

To me, it seems they are trying to force a game plan based on what worked at Bama. It's not working. Florida has talent...just bad coaching (again).

When people point out that "Obama did it", the point that's being made is this:

The media is taking Trump to task on every little perceived (or created) issue, but ignored those exact same issues when Obama did them. Not even wrong doings. They try to create controversy for Trump out of EVERYTHING. Many of the things that are so "terrible" under Trump were completely accepted and/or ignored under Obama. Take deportations as an example. Obama gave a ton of money to IRAN. Nothing was said. Obama's travel bans...not a peep. There a tons of examples of this. It's simply pointing out the hypocrisy of the media and dems. Things that were never an issue when Obama did them are now a big deal.

Kellyanne Conway put her feet on the couch. Fire her, they say. She doesn't respect the office, they say. Yet there is a photo of Michelle Obama with her feet on the same couch. And another photo of Obama with his foot on a desk in the Oval.

I think Trump overstates or exaggerates on purpose. Why? Because he knows the media will fall all over themselves "fact checking" him. In the process, they end up reporting things that they previously suppressed for their own agenda.

An example is Trumps "3.5 million illegal votes" statement. Previously, the media dismissed voter fraud. After "fact checking", media reports that it was only 800,000 fraudulent votes. The media is in such a hurry to bash him, they can't even see what he's doing. The media is being played, and it's so easy to see. Leftists and their media partners run on emotion and emotion only. Feelings overwhelm thought. That's why they can't see what he's doing to them.

This has been going on since the campaign, BTW.

Ignoring them is the most damaging thing you can do to them.

It looks like Trump is throwing out random quotes about crowd size, illegals voting, etc., because he knows the liberal media will go ape-shite trying to "correct the record". Meanwhile, he has been hard at work delivering on his promises to the American people, and dismantling 8 years of Obama's failed policy.

It's working too. The media doesn't even realize that they are being played.

Some definitions of these common liberal buzzwords:

Xenophobia - intense or irrational dislike or fear of people from other countries.

Misogynistic - strongly prejudiced against women.

They use xenophobe to describe anyone who is against ILLEGAL immigration and the taking in of mass numbers of un-vetted refugees. It's dangerous and we can't afford it. That is a policy issue and is not based in fear. There is nothing "irrational" about wanting to protect our country and our financial futures.

They use misogynistic to describe anyone who voted against or otherwise criticizes Hillary Clinton. Nevermind that Hillary is a liar, bad for the country, and just an a-hole. This dislike for her is not based on strong prejudice, though. They call Trump a misogynist because he criticized HRC, but if he was really "strongly prejudicial to women", he would never allow one to run his campaign.

I am tired of all of this labeling from the liberal left, and I am not the only one, as we learned on November 8th. Not long ago, anyone who opposed a liberal's idiotic rhetoric was instantly labeled a racist. They over used that one, so now they attack others with a variety of "phobes" and "ists". It's funny because many of these liberals will parrot those words without knowing what they mean.

Liberals use these labels as weapons. It's all they have. They cannot argue policy or defend their position on anything, because all of their positions are based on "feelings".