WashRSkins
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | Louisiana |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 456 |
| Registered on: | 12/21/2011 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Defeat the Nurse Practitioner scope of practice expansion - Louisiana SB 187
Posted by WashRSkins on 5/25/16 at 12:46 am to greenhead11
You do realize that not every NP feels this way right? We don't all go around wearing long white coats trying to act like MDs. I was required to get a white coat and place my credentials on it. If I had a choice, I wouldn't wear one.
Not every NP is for this, some of us understand our limitations.
Not every NP is for this, some of us understand our limitations.
re: Defeat the Nurse Practitioner scope of practice expansion - Louisiana SB 187
Posted by WashRSkins on 5/24/16 at 8:41 am to WaWaWeeWa
I can only speak for my experience. My class work was not 100% online. I actually felt better sitting in a classroom with an instructor. Online classes just seem useless to me. I'm assuming the State Board of Nursing sets some sort of standards for school admission and curriculum but I don't believe all the curriculum is exactly the same. Certain core classes are the same but their is differences between the schools.
You can choose any preceptor. It can be either an MD or NP. I followed MDs for my OB/GYN hours and NPs for my family and Peds hours. I graduated as a FNP so the majority of my hours were based in the Family care/Primary Care setting.
But like I said before, it needs to start with the schools and curriculum before something even remotely close to this bill should be passed. I feel like NPs are jumping ahead of themselves.
I'm sure certain experienced NPs who are in support of this bill do not like what I'm saying. But I'm just speaking from a new graduate perspective.
You can choose any preceptor. It can be either an MD or NP. I followed MDs for my OB/GYN hours and NPs for my family and Peds hours. I graduated as a FNP so the majority of my hours were based in the Family care/Primary Care setting.
But like I said before, it needs to start with the schools and curriculum before something even remotely close to this bill should be passed. I feel like NPs are jumping ahead of themselves.
I'm sure certain experienced NPs who are in support of this bill do not like what I'm saying. But I'm just speaking from a new graduate perspective.
re: Defeat the Nurse Practitioner scope of practice expansion - Louisiana SB 187
Posted by WashRSkins on 5/24/16 at 1:00 am to MississippiLSUfan
So you are agreeing with me? I'm pretty sure I'm trying to say the same thing. Just making sure my post was clear.
re: Defeat the Nurse Practitioner scope of practice expansion - Louisiana SB 187
Posted by WashRSkins on 5/24/16 at 12:40 am to WashRSkins
The NP vs. PA argument should have it's own thread. But I know several new graduate PAs that feel the same way I do about practicing fresh out of school. There's no way they would want to practice without supervision.
But I would pump the brakes on saying that PAs are so far and above superior in training when compared to NPs. I feel my experience as a nurse working with patients before becoming a NP has helped me. Most PAs that I know didn't have any medical experience before starting PA school. The only patient interaction they had was during school or maybe as a scribe before PA school.
But I would pump the brakes on saying that PAs are so far and above superior in training when compared to NPs. I feel my experience as a nurse working with patients before becoming a NP has helped me. Most PAs that I know didn't have any medical experience before starting PA school. The only patient interaction they had was during school or maybe as a scribe before PA school.
re: Defeat the Nurse Practitioner scope of practice expansion - Louisiana SB 187
Posted by WashRSkins on 5/24/16 at 12:29 am to LATigerdoc
I replied in this thread earlier but I'll say a few more things since its still going.
I'm a new grad Nurse Practitioner. I will be starting my new job in June as a NP in the ER. I have almost 10 years as a RN in the ER and I'm comfortable as a RN but the training I went through in NP school has not prepared me to practice in the ER or anywhere independently. Actually I think my experience as an ER Nurse has me more prepared. I'm already stressing about all of the things I do not know. I chose this so I can practice under the supervision of more experienced MDs. I'm hoping to use the first few years of working as a NP as an on the job residency to learn more and even then I would want the ability to ask questions and consult others with certain cases I wouldn't be confident with.
In my opinion, the bill being proposed should not pass. It needs to be amended to add more collaborating practice hours but it shouldn't stop there. The NP program needs to be re-structured. The curriculum has several nursing theory classes and research classes that do not prepare you to actually practice medicine. NPs still take patho, pharmacology, and health assessment classes, I actually had patho, physiology, anatomy, and pharmacology classes to get a Bachelor's in nursing as well. The NP classes were more in depth. Also I actually did have a cadaver with the med students in nursing school. I'm getting off topic but basically the graduate nursing schools need to raise the standards for acceptance to graduate school. You should have a minimum of 5 years as a RN with a bachelor's degree before you can even be considered. It seems like they are just pumping people through these schools like crazy. There's no way I would trust some of the people I graduated with to make decisions about my healthcare without oversight from someone else. They just don't have the experience. I don't even trust myself making these decisions right now without supervision. It's what I signed up for, I don't know why it suddenly needs to change.
I'm a new grad Nurse Practitioner. I will be starting my new job in June as a NP in the ER. I have almost 10 years as a RN in the ER and I'm comfortable as a RN but the training I went through in NP school has not prepared me to practice in the ER or anywhere independently. Actually I think my experience as an ER Nurse has me more prepared. I'm already stressing about all of the things I do not know. I chose this so I can practice under the supervision of more experienced MDs. I'm hoping to use the first few years of working as a NP as an on the job residency to learn more and even then I would want the ability to ask questions and consult others with certain cases I wouldn't be confident with.
In my opinion, the bill being proposed should not pass. It needs to be amended to add more collaborating practice hours but it shouldn't stop there. The NP program needs to be re-structured. The curriculum has several nursing theory classes and research classes that do not prepare you to actually practice medicine. NPs still take patho, pharmacology, and health assessment classes, I actually had patho, physiology, anatomy, and pharmacology classes to get a Bachelor's in nursing as well. The NP classes were more in depth. Also I actually did have a cadaver with the med students in nursing school. I'm getting off topic but basically the graduate nursing schools need to raise the standards for acceptance to graduate school. You should have a minimum of 5 years as a RN with a bachelor's degree before you can even be considered. It seems like they are just pumping people through these schools like crazy. There's no way I would trust some of the people I graduated with to make decisions about my healthcare without oversight from someone else. They just don't have the experience. I don't even trust myself making these decisions right now without supervision. It's what I signed up for, I don't know why it suddenly needs to change.
re: Defeat the Nurse Practitioner scope of practice expansion - Louisiana SB 187
Posted by WashRSkins on 5/14/16 at 12:15 am to LATigerdoc
Are you responding to me? I feel like I'm agreeing with you but what I'm saying is not clear. I don't think anything that was said was outrageous.
re: Defeat the Nurse Practitioner scope of practice expansion - Louisiana SB 187
Posted by WashRSkins on 5/14/16 at 12:12 am to Hopeful Doc
Well then I didn't realize that. Either way I'm not disagreeing with you. I agree more hours of training and clinical work is necessary but I didn't write the bill.
I also agree that some of these NPs/DNPs are way crazy with this shite and need to take a step back and remember their role in healthcare. It should be a team effort.
I also agree that some of these NPs/DNPs are way crazy with this shite and need to take a step back and remember their role in healthcare. It should be a team effort.
re: Defeat the Nurse Practitioner scope of practice expansion - Louisiana SB 187
Posted by WashRSkins on 5/14/16 at 12:01 am to LATigerdoc
I was just pointing out that they actually have to practice under the supervision for a certain period of time and then be approved to practice in a designated rural shortage primary care area.
You are acting like NPs can just go straight from graduation to practice without supervision and that's just false.
I already said that I don't think its enough time and training to go straight to practice, and I would not practice without a supervising physician but if some NPs have put in enough time and are approved to work in these rural shortage areas I don't see a problem with it. It won't be me doing that but some people like primary care.
You are acting like NPs can just go straight from graduation to practice without supervision and that's just false.
I already said that I don't think its enough time and training to go straight to practice, and I would not practice without a supervising physician but if some NPs have put in enough time and are approved to work in these rural shortage areas I don't see a problem with it. It won't be me doing that but some people like primary care.
re: Defeat the Nurse Practitioner scope of practice expansion - Louisiana SB 187
Posted by WashRSkins on 5/13/16 at 11:29 pm to LATigerdoc
Did any of you actually read the bill? You can't just graduate from an online NP school and start practicing where ever you want. I recently graduated NP school. The training was not even remotely close to what MDs receive. I'm not trying to be a doctor. I've worked as an RN in the ER for almost 10 years and I know I don't know everything. I'll be starting work as an NP in an ER soon and I am happy to have physician supervision, I wouldn't want to work without it.
But some of you docs are acting like NPs are uneducated med school rejects. This is from the bill
I know 2000 clinical hours doesn't compare to med school or residency but it's something. Honestly I'm not even in favor of the bill. I'm indifferent because it won't effect where I want to work, but some of you really sound like cocky a-holes in this thread
But some of you docs are acting like NPs are uneducated med school rejects. This is from the bill
quote:
(2) Has experience as recognized by the board to be no less than two thousand hours in collaborative practice.
quote:
nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, and certified nurse midwives who practice in a parish designated wholly or in part as a primary care health shortage area as set forth under Section 332 of the Public Health Services Act, as determined by the UnitedStatesDepartment of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and 5 Services Administration.
I know 2000 clinical hours doesn't compare to med school or residency but it's something. Honestly I'm not even in favor of the bill. I'm indifferent because it won't effect where I want to work, but some of you really sound like cocky a-holes in this thread
re: Has anybody else not gotten their refund for McNeese?
Posted by WashRSkins on 10/6/15 at 10:14 pm to lsursb
Got mine refunded to my credit card last week
re: What does it mean if a chick tells you she's an "old soul" ??
Posted by WashRSkins on 9/24/15 at 9:48 pm to Sampson
Had a chick tell me the exact same thing a few months ago. Still haven't figured out what she meant by it. She didn't seem that crazy though.
Where's the Alan Jackson concert ?
Where's the Alan Jackson concert ?
re: The Wire
Posted by WashRSkins on 1/13/14 at 10:17 pm to lostlocalfm
Keep watching, you won't be disappointed.
re: Bayou Bash 2014
Posted by WashRSkins on 1/11/14 at 12:21 am to bigberg2000
You plan on going, BigBerg ?
re: Pete Maravich double bird to Bama fans
Posted by WashRSkins on 11/20/13 at 7:28 pm to tigerpimpbot
Fire Javi
re: Odell says "keep it classy"
Posted by WashRSkins on 11/20/13 at 7:24 pm to LSUcajun77
So as long as there's no "cocks" involved we should be good... :cool:
re: Odell says "keep it classy"
Posted by WashRSkins on 11/20/13 at 7:17 pm to Adam4LSU
quote:
I still find it hilarious that oweo was banned for saying "you suck"
So if oweo is followed by "you suck" its banned again. :banghead: You have got to be kidding me there.
So when they announce the other teams starting lineups and people yell "sucks" after the players name, announcing the lineups should be banned??
re: LSU 81 vs UNO 54 Final Mickey's Clubhouse !!!
Posted by WashRSkins on 11/19/13 at 7:36 pm to thunderbird1100
Quarterman just jumped over that dudes head
re: LSU 81 vs UNO 54 Final Mickey's Clubhouse !!!
Posted by WashRSkins on 11/19/13 at 7:16 pm to DBeaux225
Derenbecker!!! :lol:
re: LSU 81 vs UNO 54 Final Mickey's Clubhouse !!!
Posted by WashRSkins on 11/19/13 at 7:14 pm to harry coleman beast
Looks like one of those padded wrestling helmet things
re: LSU 81 vs UNO 54 Final Mickey's Clubhouse !!!
Posted by WashRSkins on 11/19/13 at 7:12 pm to OllaTiger
quote:
What is #15 for UNO wearing?
Sensitive ears I guess :dunno:
Popular
2











