632627

quote:

---

The premise is so absurd that it might actually be good.

---

Same could be said about the original run

Voog, vug, vfmo

quote:

---

Go woke go broke

---

Their decline has nothing to do with this.

The most valuable companies are woke as frick

quote:

---

You're being intentionally obtuse because it's glaringly obvious how it benefits them. Look at every institution they run

---

Just realized you’re the guy defending Candace in the other thread.

Everything is a Joo conspiracy.

Joos love money so much they’re looking to destroy western capitalist society.

quote:

---

Until the very end when Andrew knew 0/7 of the charges against Tyler Robinson. He was 75% certain Tyler is guilty but 0% certain of the charges.

---

This is semantics. From a macro standpoint, it’s murder, but there’s multiple ways to frame it and they always include lesser charges as a fallback for the jury.

quote:

---

What? I’ve never even heard any SC fan say this. The ’05 offense was better, but it was basically the same crew as the ’04 team, just with more experience. The difference was the defenses. The ’04 defense was dominant, #1 in the country in rushing defense, # 2 in scoring defense, and #5 in total defense. The ’05 defense was decent, but in the same categories I listed for the ’04 team, the ’05 team ranked 31st, 28th, and 46th, respectively. You can even throw in their 71st ranked pass defense that year. Another example, in the most important drive of the season, Texas’ game winning one in the Rose Bowl, the Ting twins were on the field trying to help protect the SC lead. Those dudes would have never seen the field in ‘04.

---

All of this. 05 usc was the greatest offense I’d ever seen up until 2019 lsu, but 04 usc was an overall better team due to their defense. 05 usc got shredded by Fresno st for Christ sake. If Pete Carroll had his 04 D in the game against VY, they don’t lose. I’d make the argument 2008 SC was better than 05

I don’t even know how you can debate someone that blatantly lies as much as Candace. Nothing out of her mouth is true, she’ll just keep blabbering nonsense. I get why Ben Shapiro says he won’t debate certain people. If the starting points are so far apart, there’s no chance at having any type of rational discussion.

quote:

---

Self described "bloodsport debater."

---

Good write up of Wilson. He’s pretty unique in the podcaster space. He’s basically an “America first” type without all the jootard conspiracy shite. He isn’t necessarily a pundit or an interviewer; debating is his bread & butter, and he’s probably the best political debater on YouTube.

Generally a good list, agree that Indiana doesn’t belong. Top 4 are accurate IMO.

quote:

---

Remove all politics and I would take LA

---

Political landscape in LA is arguably better than in NY.

As a place to live, unless you are young & single, Los Angeles (better weather, better access to a variety of outdoorsy & family activities) is superior to New York.

However, I think as a tourist or visitor, NYC is a far more interesting place to visit than LA. NYC has better culture, history, architecture, etc.

quote:

---

I mean is he wrong? Off the top of my head guys that stayed with them or went elsewhere since the organization started behaving like this

---

You’re missing a bunch of guys from the Guggenheim era:

Seager
Bellinger
Kenley Jansen
Oneil cruz
Wrobleski (so far)
Joc pederson

Then there’s the cast offs that dodgers turned into impact players such as Justin turner and max muncy