Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:22359
Registered on:8/20/2005
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
"Listen, if Oscar hadn't run into Miss Davis, an American would have. So what's the big deal?" - 44 million democrats
quote:

Good Lord. The stupidity of that woman is breathtaking. If I was a family member of someone who died because of no electricity, I'd be suing her arse PERSONALLY. Not trimming tree limbs is an absolute dereliction of duty.

These idiots are making me become a fan of personal injury trial attorneys.
quote:

He should have tazed her

After the first 30 seconds of her nonsensical rant, he should have smiled, said "have a good day, I'm going back to my work", rolled the window up and ignored her insane arse.

You're not going to change a liberal woman's POV, help her see the other side of an argument - she is 100% certain about her political infallibility - but women hate to be ignored. Really, really hate it. 50/50 chance he'd have had an opportunity to arrest her for doing something stupid.
quote:

Trump is very good at politics. Sometimes too good. He won three Presidential elections. Not many people can say that.

Trump is very good at election politics, but I think a president's success in getting shite done in congress is also "politics" and on that account, Trump is feeble.
quote:

Trump’s actions with regards to the Epstein files are hard to figure out. Stuff is coming out.

Bondi is useless.

Agree

quote:

None of that changes Massie’s incomprehensible nonsense. Defend the quote in the OP.

While Trump is the idiot that started the cat fight (over Covid spending), Massie's play would have been to let it quiet/pass. He shouldn't be making statements like the one you're referring to.

re: Wah!!!!

Posted by David_DJS on 2/15/26 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

Ron was Aipacs choice and Massie endorsed Ron hes a hypocrite like all massholes

Setting your tortured logic aside for a moment, Ron was Aipac's choice for what?
quote:

"particularly when parental access is restricted ... students are widely recognized as a vulnerable population and especially susceptible to influence. For this reason safeguarding measures, parental involvement and transparency are essential"

She argues this about attending a TPUSA event, but I wonder if she applies the same principles to parental notification for abortions or tranny shite done at schools.
quote:

Pro gun control will just shrug this off and tell you, with extreme confidence, that gun laws would have stopped the shooter from getting a gun.

Well, they're mostly Democrats, so, you know - retarded.
quote:

Yes, the rules are set. It's this crazy thing called our Constitution. And it says the states set the rules for their own elections.

If 75% of the country supports voter ID, then have them contact their representatives in Congress and have them convene a constitutional convention to change the Constitution.

That's how it's supposed to work

You are wrong.

The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA), also known as the Motor Voter Act, is a United States federal law signed into law by President Bill Clinton on May 20, 1993, that came into effect on January 1, 1995.[1] The law was enacted under the Elections Clause of the United States Constitution and advances voting rights in the United States by requiring state governments to offer simplified voter registration processes for any eligible person who applies for or renews a driver's license or applies for public assistance

The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (also known as the “NVRA” or “motor voter law”) sets forth certain voter registration requirements with respect to elections for federal office. Section 5 of the NVRA requires that States offer voter registration opportunities at State motor vehicle agencies. Section 6 of the NVRA requires that States offer voter registration opportunities by mail-in application. Section 7 of the NVRA requires that States offer voter registration opportunities at certain State and local offices, including public assistance and disability offices. Section 8 of the NVRA contains requirements with respect to the administration of voter registration by States and requires States to implement procedures to maintain accurate and current voter registration lists.


Then in 2013, this decision was based on the NVRA -

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (7-2) in Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona (ITCA), Inc., that the federal National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) of 1993 pre-empts an Arizona voter registration law requiring documents showing proof of citizenship.

"Today’s decision is a significant victory for U.S. citizens and their ability to register to vote without burdensome requirements. In our democracy, if you don’t vote, you don’t count, and the Arizona law was a blatant effort to keep some citizens from making their voice heard in our elections,” said Wade Henderson, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights.

The Court affirmed a lower-court decision in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which found that Arizona’s Proposition 200 conflicted with the NVRA and that the NVRA takes precedence over the state law. The decision was based on the elections clause of the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress the power to regulate the “time, place, and manner” of federal elections.


So clearly, the federal government can pass laws that dictate how registration for and voting in federal elections will be done.
quote:

The idea that Congress can set the rules for national elections is questionable.

It's not questionable. Congress/fedgov already does it.

Obama's DOJ sued the state of Arizona twice over new state law that required proof of citizenship to register/vote. Got the supreme court and in both cases the state law was struck down for federal elections. Court said the law could stand for state and local elections. This is how the "federal only" voter was created, and it's nationwide - not just AZ.

So the federal gov't is already setting rules for federal elections.
quote:

Are all young males pussies these days?

Pretty much.
quote:

Why would he do that

Well, he's a Democrat so, you know, retarded.
quote:

That account posts alot of AI generated posts and images for boomers

You think boomers are on X? :lol:
quote:

He is well aware that every bill is also loaded with shite ya don't want.

Which explains why threads like this one are common on this site.
quote:

How do you decide when a warning clears a bar of sufficient significance for you?

Good question. It probably depends on what we're talking about. If it's something that's familiar versus something new (for me), then the bar is higher. There's also math, as in probabilities - I sat with my wife and one other couple in a restaurant while the rest of the place cleared out because of a bomb threat - all the other patrons, staff and the police that had gone table-to-table to warn everyone of the threat headed for the doors. This was in Mesa, AZ circa 1990 - and my math told me it was some kid that didn't want to wash dishes that night. If I had been in NYC, I would have probably taken it more seriously.
quote:

David, his public record as an environmental activist is a mile long.

True. I was probably expressing my own POV above. And I'm a guy that had a daughter in ICU for 3 days because of HUS. So it's not that I'm all for E. coli for everybody. It just takes a lot to make me alarmed about a "warning" issued by regulators.
quote:

Are you kidding?

Not at all.

quote:

He spent decades as a trial lawyer suing polluters and trying to get stricter environmental regulation passed. He believes chemicals can harm you and should be out of rivers, E. coli is A-ok.

This has nothing to do with what I posted. And you can't be surprised a trial lawyer sued someone about something he, perhaps, doesn't give much of a shite about?
quote:

Massie votes NO based on a 24 hour notice technicality, then turns around and notes Yes the same day. So much for principles, did Massie really need the 24 hours or was he just trying to kill The Save Act?

The suspension of the 24 hour notice wasn't for the SAVE act. It was for spending bills for the rest of this fiscal year. Not a small thing.
quote:

Then why vote against the bill to bring it to a vote? That vote cannot be explained away.

Because that vote wasn't a clean vote. It included the suspension of the rule I mentioned.

Massie voted for a bill similar to the SAVE act last year. He voted for it this year. Are you arguing he doesn't support the SAVE act?
quote:

His personal experience has taught him that germs just don't cause disease.

Or it could that his personal experience is that government/regulators exaggerate TF out of risks/dangers, and so you take it all with a grain of salt.

Or it could be both.
quote:

I’m pretty sure he has said he has all the names.

I can't find any reference to that and ChatGPT can't either. Is this something you read in these threads or have you seen it elsewhere?