Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:309
Registered on:9/3/2011
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Schefter on Brees

Posted by itsover9000 on 3/2/12 at 11:05 am
You people are so naive. The players don't care about you.

re: The Onion on BCS championship:

Posted by itsover9000 on 1/19/12 at 11:58 pm
quote:

Can any one say truthfully that Alabama is not Number One after shutting out the best in the US [on Jan. 8th] and only letting them past the 50 yard line one time????????????



Yes

re: Why do gumps call us corndogs?

Posted by itsover9000 on 1/19/12 at 2:44 am
quote:

What I dont understand is why they hate us so much. They kicked our arse and should be on top of the world. Shouldn't they have been celebrating? Maybe that is how they celebrate. Go find a drunk guy and rub their ballsack in his face. Weird.


It's only natural. They know they won in a fluke game so they don't feel secure about their win.
LSU fans, you really don't have to stick up for Mathieu, we were the ones that watched every one of his games, we know what he is capable of. Oh yeah, and he is returning as a junior. :pimp:
I'm pretty sure on the big punt return there were 2 blocks in the back not called.
quote:

Cam, Nick > Flynn, Dorsey


And you can't argue that.



Nick and Dorsey, I don't know about you, but I watched both, and that's debatable. Oh yeah, and don't forget, but Dorsey was hurt in the middle of the year and played with injuries. Something to chew on.

Flynn isn't as good as Cam, but we have the better defense.
quote:

It would be a good game, but 2010 Au had the skill to find ways to win when close. Add in Cam and Nick, have to go with auburn



Okay, fine, I'll pick LSU with Flynn and Dorsey :lol:

re: Who Do We Think We Are?

Posted by itsover9000 on 1/17/12 at 6:08 pm
quote:

Now, I refuse to add 2011. It will just stay at 2009. Yes, I'm mad.


Simple, just add 2011*. If I saw that, I would laugh out loud.
quote:

So who wins between 2007 LSU and 2010 AU?



Like I said, I just know it would be a good game. A great offense and defense against and awesome offense and a terrible defense.
quote:

I bolded them bc they lost those two games. Honestly, I don't care what the score was. A "W" is "W" and a "L" is a "L". itsover9000 saying AU 10' doesn't belong on the list is asinine and screams "I'm butt-hurt."



Your obviously a homer, but maybe I can get you to understand something. First, I will respond to your comment. I responded to someone else saying that LSU didn't belong on the list. I never said Auburn didn't belong(don't go back to the post where I said "if anyone doesn't belong etc), it's not the same thing.

Now, the thing is, technically, your right. However, if we look at both of LSU's games, it could have went either way. Then we look at your 5 games where you won by less than or equal to 3 points and again, the game could have went either way. This is why I say it's pathetic when you use the "A W is a W" excuse, because you have nothing else but that. Nothing is wrong with that when your discussing who won what. But when we talk in terms of skill, anybody that uses that argument is just looking for an excuse because they have no other.
Auburn had no defense whatsoever. They played 3 "good" teams that year. Alabama who had lost 9 starters they beat by 1 after being down by 24 points. They only scored 24 points on an LSU defense that wasn't as good as 2007 LSU's and allowed 17 points against an LSU offense that was not half as good as 2007 LSU's offense. They beat the only other good team they played that year, Oregon by 3. Also, the score was tied 19-19 with 2 min left in the game and went 30 yards on a fluke play. I don't see what is so complicated about this. I understand you're homers, but come on.

Edit: Also, I was just being an arse. Auburn would go 1 space beneath 2007 LSU, not 4.
quote:

We did win all three of those games. A "W" is "W".



The fact that you have to use that argument is hilarious.

quote:

And we beat them by 22 points. STFU.



You allowed 43 points.

quote:

Obviously the 526 yards on offense against the vaunted LSU defense, including 440 yards rushing still bothers you.be the same as it is today.



If yards won games, college football would not be the same as it is today. Oh, and it bothers me as much as the 533 yards against 2011 LSU's defense did.

quote:

We came back from a 24 point deficit and beat them in their own house. Once again, a "W" is "W".


Once again, the same terrible argument, and you still only beat an Alabama team that had 9 new starters on defense by 1.

quote:

Once again, a "W" is "W", and our Crystal Trophy is fricking fabulous.


Again? We aren't talking about crystal footballs, we're talking about a team's skill.

Any more stupid comments? I suggest you go look at 2007 LSU's scores before you post again.

quote:

Ok?


Bear with me, it'll be worth it.

Wow, you really are butthurt aren't you? If any team shouldn't be included on the list, it's Auburn. I won't even say anything about Auburn paying scam newton. Even the 2007 LSU tigers had a balanced team, and it would have been a great game against auburn between the 2 bottom champions(not that I'm saying that the teams aren't good, it's just the other teams are great.) Don't agree? Look at Auburn's scores:

Difference:
unranked Clemson: 27-24 OT D: 3
unranked Mississippi State: 17-14 D: 3
#12 South Carolina: 35-27 D: 8
unranked Kentucky: 37-34 D: 3
#12 Arkansas: you allowed 43 points LAWL
#6 LSU: 24-17 D: 7
#11 Alabama: 28-27 D: 1
Oregon: 22-19, don't get me started D: 3

Where am I going with this? Look at 2007 LSU scores, the team that you say shouldn't even belong.
This is overall

1. 2011 Alabama Crimson Tide
2. 2009 Alabama Crimson Tide
2. 2011 LSU Tigers
2. 2008 Florida Gators
3. 2007 LSU Tigers
4. 2006 Florida Gators



5.2010 Auburn Tigers
Does anybody know if there is a stream for this game? I'm at my dorm with my wonderful 60 channels.
The pain from LSU's game hardened me, I only felt like shite for a couple of hours after the game.
As much as I would love to have an excuse for playing like we did, something like that would be terrible for the program. I won't believe anything until either one of the players or coaches comes out and says something. I believe that if we played again, it would a different ball game, but that's all over now.
I've never seen a more obvious troll get replies.

Dude, we took the lead with 1:30 left and the only reason they won is because of two stupid lob passes and one breakaway in one of those lobs. They got lucky, it'll be okay. Hopefully we can bolster our defense in the draft and we'll be even better next year. Think about it, a superbowl worthy team getting better, it'll all be okay.

re: Pierre's hit video and rules

Posted by itsover9000 on 1/15/12 at 11:04 am
1.Yes, how could he have avoided the hit if he wanted to, it was too fast.

It was a pretty big play, your right, with a 7-0 lead we might never make stupid turnovers and most likely destroy this team, as the defense was playing superb, at least until you know when.

However, having said that, don't expect anybody here to agree with you. Most of them won't agree and will even attack you, because they don't want to be seen as making excuses. It's pretty pathetic actually.

As for people saying it was a good no call, you have no right to complain about any helmet to helmet hit again.

It'll work itself out though. The packers are gonna rape the giants, and don't think they will turn the ball over 5 times.