southeasttiger113

quote:

---

Arky whipped the dogshit out of LSU for two years in a row. That happened because the players didn't care to win the game? What the frick are LSU fans paying for? Your guys quit the game before it even starts!

---

Yea, they did. Pisses me off but it's pretty obvious if you look at the lack of effort and intensity starting in the first quarter. Sometimes teams show up flat, LSU has done that 2 years in a row vs Arkansas for a lot of reasons

quote:

---

This year, Arky is re-building

---

Rebuilding what? Their 7-5 team from last year? Arkansas sucks, period. LSU has been better than them and lost. You're blinded by your hate of LSU if you can't see that

And again, you're acting like I'm talking about the sporting event itself and not the prediction that we're making

quote:

---

As he keeps saying, all sports are 50/50 regardless of any kind of stats, location, injuries, coaching, matchups, etc. All just blind luck.

---

I have never said this once. You do understand that a baseball game and betting on baseball are completely different entities that have absolutely nothing to do with each other right? We're talking about betting and predicting the outcome of the game in this thread. Can you get that through your stupid fricking thick skull?

quote:

---

proven you wrong

---

About what? Claiming that it's possible to predict the future by looking at past results? That's false, whether you and your gambling problem friends agree with me or not

So now I'm saying that I can predict what happens in sporting events? Holy shite you people are great

quote:

---

Bro, you have been responding directly to me for well over 15 posts and an hour

---

I've been responding to multiple people and you think they're all to you or all indirectly replying to you, they're not. There was a string of 5 posts where you took completely independent discussions I was having and applied it to our argument

quote:

---

going against the hot team because the "have to lose eventually" is what's considered the fallacy.

---

No it's not. It goes both ways, and you're an idiot for repeatedly trying to cover your arse by acting like it's not

quote:

---

They love when people, like this moron, look at betting sports as anything close to 50/50 odds.

---

It is 50/50 odds. It's perfectly 50/50 and Vegas makes sure of that so there's no way to consistently win. The fact that you'd even imply that it isn't 50/50 shows just how fricking stupid you are :lol:

Again, you're dumb enough to think that past game results are a good indicator of future results so your opinion of me is completely irrelevant. Just because 5 morons are arguing with me and telling me that I got owned doesn't mean that ya'll are right

Ok, I'm mad that a bunch of idiots are agreeing with each other over the fact that they don't understand what they're talking about. Don't really care. Not sure why everybody on tigerdroppings thinks being mad is an insult

quote:

---

1. You're the mad one, re-read your posts compared to ours

---

Not really, I'm actually perfectly fine

quote:

---

2. Everyone else is also on our side and agrees that you're being an idiot

---

Ever heard of the term "circlejerk"? It's a legitimate internet phenomenon where a bunch of retards start agreeing with each other after one person starts. Everything that I was "wrong about" was taken completely out of context or people added things to my sentences that I never even said

quote:

---

3. You don't even know what you said 20 minutes prior and must be drunk/high/dumb as shite based on you not even recalling the points you made in previous posts.

---

Ok fig, we get it, you hate drugs and alcohol, but I was trolling TexAg's bitch arse in that post. I've never done a narcotic in my life nor have I even thought about posting here when I'm drinking

quote:

---

You argued that you didn't even say past results weren't real

---

No, I never said that they weren't real. I'm sorry that you're an idiot and interpreted it that way. I said that past events which are frozen in history and no longer dynamic aren't a good indicator of future success in comparison to things like physical talent of living, breathing, walking, thinking humans who are currently on a team. You can twist my words all you want, it doesn't make it true and it doesn't make your retarded arse right. You keep repeating things that I've clarified repeatedly and some of which I never even implied, are you that desperate to be right?

quote:

---

Vegas would not exist if there was. Like, do you seriously believe that past events in sports affect what happens in future games? If they did, everyone would make an absolute shite ton of money by betting on sports. There are entirely too many moving parts in sports to use last year as an argument of what's going to happen this year.

---

This was what SummerOfGeorge interpreted as me calling football a "coin flip". I'm sorry that ya'll are complete idiots. The coin flip quote came directly after I said this. Nothing that I said was wrong and I said that BETTING ON AN SEC FOOTBALL GAME AND PREDICTING ITS OUTCOME is basically a coin flip, which it is. I never said that the actual football game is a "cpin flip" but ya'll keep running with it, ya'll are all so mad that there's no rational reason to believe that Arkansas is going to beat LSU next year :lol: