cssamerican
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 8063 |
| Registered on: | 3/28/2011 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: What is the point of a debate?
Posted by cssamerican on 2/17/26 at 11:27 pm to northshorebamaman
From AI on his position:
The available evidence from Andrew Wilson’s debates, statements, and content indicates that he does not argue for a dictatorship or the enforcement of Christian nationalist ideals as a minority position imposed on an unwilling majority through governmental force. Instead, his positions emphasize working within the existing democratic framework—primarily through voting, elections, and representative government—to achieve cultural and political dominance for Christians. He frames this as Christians legitimately seeking and exercising power when they hold majority influence or elected positions, aligning laws with Christian ethics without subverting constitutional processes.
He’s essentially arguing that Christians should support policies and leaders shaped by Christian values, working within the Constitution just like any other interest group. Critics label this as far-right extremism because the values being promoted are explicitly Christian. The definition of “far-right” has shifted, from describing state-run nationalist or ethnoreligious authoritarianism to describing almost any situation where religious, especially Christian, influence affects secular public life. In this view, secularism is now treated as the neutral center, while only very radical anti-capitalist communism is seen as truly left wing.
Under this definition the United States has been a far right extremist country for the majority of it’s existence,
The available evidence from Andrew Wilson’s debates, statements, and content indicates that he does not argue for a dictatorship or the enforcement of Christian nationalist ideals as a minority position imposed on an unwilling majority through governmental force. Instead, his positions emphasize working within the existing democratic framework—primarily through voting, elections, and representative government—to achieve cultural and political dominance for Christians. He frames this as Christians legitimately seeking and exercising power when they hold majority influence or elected positions, aligning laws with Christian ethics without subverting constitutional processes.
He’s essentially arguing that Christians should support policies and leaders shaped by Christian values, working within the Constitution just like any other interest group. Critics label this as far-right extremism because the values being promoted are explicitly Christian. The definition of “far-right” has shifted, from describing state-run nationalist or ethnoreligious authoritarianism to describing almost any situation where religious, especially Christian, influence affects secular public life. In this view, secularism is now treated as the neutral center, while only very radical anti-capitalist communism is seen as truly left wing.
Under this definition the United States has been a far right extremist country for the majority of it’s existence,
re: What is the point of a debate?
Posted by cssamerican on 2/17/26 at 3:21 pm to forkedintheroad
quote:
I don't care about the winning a debate crap...I just want the OP to define "far right"
Yeah, for some reason normal common sense thought is labeled “far right”, I’m not sure if people understand what “far right” should actually mean.
re: The Dor Brothers create new AI movie in 1 day that would cost studios 200m to make
Posted by cssamerican on 2/17/26 at 7:14 am to MrLSU
Well, it has basically no story, weak dialogue, and terrible acting. The only reason this has a chance to unseat Hollywood is because that’s the same problem Hollywood currently has.
re: What would you tell the dying man?
Posted by cssamerican on 2/17/26 at 7:06 am to lsufanva
I’m not sure if death bed confessions are as simple and sure as everyone makes them out to be, If you don’t really have faith and trust in God I don’t think it matters. So, I would just ask if he had a message for a loved one and promise to pass it on.
We all know about the thief at the cross and the story of Lazarus and the rich man, we all know that Paul in Philippians 1:23 desires “to depart and be with Christ, for that is very much better.” And these passages are what we base our idea of how it all works. However, I never thought the most direct explanation 1 Thessalonians 4:13–18 came across that way.
But we do not want you to be uninformed, brothers, about those who are asleep, that you may not grieve as others do who have no hope. For since we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so, through Jesus, God will bring with him those who have fallen asleep. For this we declare to you by a word from the Lord, that we who are alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord, will not precede those who have fallen asleep. For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the sound of the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we will always be with the Lord. Therefore encourage one another with these words.
I sometimes think the scripture kept the mechanics of the afterlife a mystery, perhaps intentionally.
quote:I’ve wondered about this…If we aren’t judged until the second coming, how do we receive our punishment or reward beforehand?
He'll find out if heaven/hell is real before we do.
We all know about the thief at the cross and the story of Lazarus and the rich man, we all know that Paul in Philippians 1:23 desires “to depart and be with Christ, for that is very much better.” And these passages are what we base our idea of how it all works. However, I never thought the most direct explanation 1 Thessalonians 4:13–18 came across that way.
But we do not want you to be uninformed, brothers, about those who are asleep, that you may not grieve as others do who have no hope. For since we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so, through Jesus, God will bring with him those who have fallen asleep. For this we declare to you by a word from the Lord, that we who are alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord, will not precede those who have fallen asleep. For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the sound of the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we will always be with the Lord. Therefore encourage one another with these words.
I sometimes think the scripture kept the mechanics of the afterlife a mystery, perhaps intentionally.
re: Lindsey Graham: I come to Israel every 2 weeks
Posted by cssamerican on 2/16/26 at 8:20 pm to UncleLogger
I think Israel existing is a good thing, but this is ridiculously stupid for any US Senator to care that much about another country. Represent your state like you were elected to do!
re: UPDATE: Anyone Remember the Discussion Around Watermarked Ballots?
Posted by cssamerican on 2/15/26 at 9:50 pm to AlterEd
Call me when someone gets arrested
re: Evidence 500,000 year old petrified log cabin found in Zambia (not sure how I missed this)
Posted by cssamerican on 2/15/26 at 2:40 pm to Proximo
quote:quote:okay bud
I question all dating simply because I don’t believe they know what they are talking about.
Funny how you left off the the soft tissue part of my statement: stretchy blood vessels and collagen in 65-million-year-old T. rex bones, flexible enough to squeeze like rubber bands. Not bacteria, not mineral goo, actual dinosaur tissue.
They slap exceptional preservation on it like that’s not a massive problem for millions-of-years decay math. Iron cross-linking magic, sure, whatever helps you sleep.
Soft tissue laughs at deep time, dating assumptions crumble under scrutiny, yet somehow it’s still settled science. Cute. How wrong are the models? Probably hilariously so. Keep pretending it’s bulletproof though.
re: Evidence 500,000 year old petrified log cabin found in Zambia (not sure how I missed this)
Posted by cssamerican on 2/15/26 at 12:03 pm to Proximo
quote:
Homo erectus used tools and created simple shelters 1.5 million years ago
I question all dating simply because I don’t believe they know what they are talking about. Just look at 65 million year old dinosaur fossils with soft tissue, clearly impossible.
re: Evidence 500,000 year old petrified log cabin found in Zambia (not sure how I missed this)
Posted by cssamerican on 2/15/26 at 9:14 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Evidence 500,000 year old petrified log cabin found in Zambia (not sure how I missed this)
Because it’s a fantasy, it’s two pieces of wood, that they’re guessing how old it is.
re: Christians: “The only thing more powerful than hate is love“
Posted by cssamerican on 2/13/26 at 4:47 am to Squirrelmeister
quote:
:quote:So how did they know Jesus died and was resurrected? Was it eyewitness testimony? I highlighted the answer in bold for you.
“For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve.” 1 Corinthians 15:3-5
“For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me.”
1 Corinthians 15:3-8
Paul treats Jesus’ death and appearances as recent public events involving known individuals within living memory. Paul says he ‘received’ this tradition and names identifiable individuals, some still alive, which functions as a public claim about recent events, not a purely scriptural deduction.
quote:
I like Hebrews too, but what you quoted isn’t referring to an earthly Jesus at all. In this letter, flip to chapter 9 and read where, exactly, it says Jesus was sacrificed. Reply back to me where Hebrews specified Jesus as having been sacrificed.
“And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment, so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him.”
Hebrews 9:27-28
Hebrews describes a once-for-all offering followed by a future return, which presupposes an event in time rather than a purely symbolic act.
“For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the holy places by the high priest as a sacrifice for sin are burned outside the camp. So Jesus also suffered outside the gate in order to sanctify the people through his own blood.”
Hebrews 13:11-12
The argument compares Jesus’ suffering to known sacrificial procedures in which bodies were removed outside the camp. The comparison depends on an earthly event occurring in a real location similar to known practice. The theological point assumes the audience recognizes a historical execution.
“Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.”
Philippians 2:5-11
Paul describes a preexistent being who entered human existence and died by a known Roman punishment.
You don’t have to accept the theological claims, but the earliest Christian writings treat Jesus as a recent historical person. Paul and Hebrews do not argue that Jesus existed; they presuppose it. Their theology is built on a human life, a public execution by Roman crucifixion, and named contemporaries within living memory. That is the framework of historical claims, not symbolic mythical ones.
re: Christians: “The only thing more powerful than hate is love“
Posted by cssamerican on 2/12/26 at 10:23 am to Squirrelmeister
quote:
But the evidence is strong against it. The 7 authentic letters of Paul, Colossians, Ephesians, Hebrews, Revelation, James, 1 Peter, and Jude all reference a heavenly cosmic Christ who was killed in heaven and none of those texts makes any mention or has any knowledge of the gospel Jesus walking around Judea and Galilee
What are you talking about?
“But when the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son, born of woman, born under the law,”
Galatians 4:4
“Paul, a servant of Christ Jesus, called to be an apostle, set apart for the gospel of God, which he promised beforehand through his prophets in the holy Scriptures, concerning his Son, who was descended from David according to the flesh and was declared to be the Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness by his resurrection from the dead, Jesus Christ our Lord,”
Romans 1:1-4
“For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve.”
1 Corinthians 15:3-5
“For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit,”
1 Peter 3:18
“That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we looked upon and have touched with our hands, concerning the word of life— the life was made manifest, and we have seen it, and testify to it and proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and was made manifest to us— that which we have seen and heard we proclaim also to you, so that you too may have fellowship with us; and indeed our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ.”
1 John 1:1-3
“Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same things, that through death he might destroy the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil,”
Hebrews 2:14
re: Ford Motor company reports it lost nearly $27,000 on each EV it sold in 2025
Posted by cssamerican on 2/12/26 at 5:15 am to Night Vision
Is this is why gas vehicles have gotten so expensive, to make up for EV loses?
re: Most beers drank in one sitting
Posted by cssamerican on 2/12/26 at 4:12 am to joeybrackishwater
In college, some bar was running a special, draft beers were just 50 cents each. I’m not sure of the exact cup size, probably 6 ounces, so likely 4 ounces of actual beer. I walked in with $48 I called it a night after I ran out of money and a friend bought me a shot of Rumple Minze to cap things off. The vomiting that followed was intense, needless to say, that experience completely cured me of binge drinking.
re: Christians: “The only thing more powerful than hate is love“
Posted by cssamerican on 2/12/26 at 3:00 am to Squirrelmeister
quote:
So it’s not just a lack of evidence, but a positive evidence that Jesus was fabricated that has me unconvinced Jesus ever existed as a man.
I understand why some question Jesus’ divinity, it’s a faith issue, and views differ. But the historical evidence strongly supports Jesus as a real first-century Jewish man from Judea who taught boldly, attracted followers, and was arrested, tried, and crucified under Pontius Pilate (during Tiberius’s reign, around AD 30–33) because of his disruptive claims.
Key non-Christian sources corroborate this:
Flavius Josephus (Jewish historian, writing c. AD 93 in Antiquities of the Jews): Mentions Jesus twice. One passage (the Testimonium Flavianum) describes him as a wise teacher who performed surprising deeds, was accused by leading Jewish figures, and crucified by Pilate. Another undisputed reference calls James “the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ.” Josephus, from a prominent Jerusalem priestly family (his father likely active in the Temple around the crucifixion time), had access to reliable information and no motive to invent Jesus.
Tacitus (Roman historian, c. AD 116 in Annals): States “Christus” (Jesus) was executed by Pilate under Tiberius, founding the Christian movement that spread from Judea to Rome, where Nero persecuted followers in AD 64. Scholars consider this authentic and reliable.
While I respect that the resurrection and Jesus’ divinity are hard for many to accept due to their extraordinary nature, it’s equally difficult for me to believe the New Testament could be mere human invention. These writings form a deeply interconnected collection, richly tied to Old Testament prophecy and themes, with remarkable theological coherence across multiple authors.
The books were written relatively quickly: Paul’s letters in the 50s AD, the Gospels were within the lifespan of potential eyewitnesses.Producing such a unified body of scripture in the ancient world, amid persecution and limited resources, points to something extraordinary.
Additionally, many early believers, including eyewitnesses and those who knew Jesus personally, faced severe persecution yet refused to deny his resurrection and identity. Historical records show no recantations; figures like James (Jesus’ brother) were executed for their faith, and others like Peter and Paul met similar fates according to early sources. Their willingness to die rather than recant suggests genuine conviction, not fabrication.
For me, this combination, the rapid, profound depth of the texts and the courage of firsthand witnesses who staked their lives on it, strongly indicates divine inspiration and that Jesus was who he claimed to be.
re: Christians: “The only thing more powerful than hate is love“
Posted by cssamerican on 2/12/26 at 1:46 am to CatahoulaCur
The problem is people’s definition or perception of love. Real love, like that love you have for your children comes with correction (Because you care so much about their future), many people today conflate love with appeasement. Just because something in the moment makes you happy doesn’t mean it’s good, if you love someone you will always want what’s good for them, not necessarily what makes them happy in the moment.
re: Why we need term limits
Posted by cssamerican on 2/12/26 at 1:30 am to RollingwiththeTide
quote:Without a long-term career at stake, politicians lose the main incentive to perform well, reelection pressure disappears, so they have little reason to prioritize voters over personal gain in their final terms. Career politicians may have flaws, but the ongoing need to win reelection is the correct incentive. Remove that, and you replace accountability with a short-term mindset that benefits special interests more than the public. Bottom line: term limits won’t fix Congress, they’ll probably make the corruption and laziness worse. I would focus on age limits as a quasi term limit, just to prevent some of what we are seeing.
I have always looked at term limits like most of society looks at the id to vote issue. There is no logical reason to object to it.
re: What couldve been done to prevent the destruction of western civilizations
Posted by cssamerican on 2/12/26 at 1:02 am to LChama
Avoid these two things and society and America look completely different today. You can argue wether they should have happened or not, but I don’t think you can argue what type of impact they have had.
17th Amendment (1913) – Direct election of Senators • Killed the states’ firewall against federal overreach. Senators used to answer to state legislatures, who fiercely guarded their power. Now they’re national politicians chasing votes & lobby cash. This resulted in easier federal expansion, unchecked immigration shifts (like 1965 Hart-Celler), welfare bloat, and policies that ignore state sovereignty. Voters don’t scrutinize bills like state reps would.
19th Amendment (1920) – Women’s suffrage • Expanded the electorate during a wave of individualism, education boom, urbanization, wars pulling women into jobs, contraception, and rising family costs. It reinforced trends toward smaller families, delayed marriage, and dual-income norms, driving fertility below replacement. Politicians then chased mass immigration to plug labor/pension gaps instead of fixing family incentives. Broader voter base (including women’s focus on welfare, health, kids) tilted discourse toward compassionate spending over long-term national sustainability.
17th Amendment (1913) – Direct election of Senators • Killed the states’ firewall against federal overreach. Senators used to answer to state legislatures, who fiercely guarded their power. Now they’re national politicians chasing votes & lobby cash. This resulted in easier federal expansion, unchecked immigration shifts (like 1965 Hart-Celler), welfare bloat, and policies that ignore state sovereignty. Voters don’t scrutinize bills like state reps would.
19th Amendment (1920) – Women’s suffrage • Expanded the electorate during a wave of individualism, education boom, urbanization, wars pulling women into jobs, contraception, and rising family costs. It reinforced trends toward smaller families, delayed marriage, and dual-income norms, driving fertility below replacement. Politicians then chased mass immigration to plug labor/pension gaps instead of fixing family incentives. Broader voter base (including women’s focus on welfare, health, kids) tilted discourse toward compassionate spending over long-term national sustainability.
re: Is there a better King Cake than Dong Phuong?
Posted by cssamerican on 2/11/26 at 5:50 am to tuzak
I recently tried a plain traditional king cake from Doughlicious Donuts and was really impressed. I hadn’t been a fan of their doughnut-style version in the past, so the traditional one was a pleasant surprise.
re: In shocking news, Lisa Murkowski just announced she will not support the SAVE ACT
Posted by cssamerican on 2/11/26 at 5:43 am to cadillacattack
We can’t win, even when we have majorities we have idiots like this on our side :banghead:
re: Here's the X page of the judge who cut an unrepentant rapist's sentence in half
Posted by cssamerican on 2/11/26 at 5:41 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Her reasoning is shite, of course, but at least 32.5 years isn’t exactly a slap on the wrist.
I can only imagine the bullshite she pulls with “lesser” felonies.
I believe he would be eligible for parole in 27 years. However, if some kind of way she reclassified it as non-violent he would be eligible for parole in 6.5 years. Either way, it’s ridiculous. We should be looking at gallows for people like this so we don have to take care of them for life are worry about others lives when they are released. We have gone in the wrong direction as far as criminal punishment is concerned.
re: Fulton Co. Ballot Images from 2020 Found to Be MODIFIED in 2024
Posted by cssamerican on 2/11/26 at 4:05 am to VoxDawg
I keep circling back to this one. You can claim he just “misspoke” till you’re blue in the face, but that’s one hell of a bizarre slip-up, and what a freaky “coincidence” that his gaffe nailed the shadiest, most rigged-looking election disaster in American history before it happened. Nah, it’s way more likely he knew the scam was locked in and his crumbling brain just let the cat out of the bag. That’s all the proof I’ve ever required, and it explains the decline that’s plagued this country through my entire adult life.
Popular
0












