TigerVespamon
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 7551 |
| Registered on: | 12/11/2010 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
0
re: Bring Us Your Memes: 2024 Election Day and Beyond
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/24/26 at 1:06 pm to blueboy
re: AI simulates the 2026 Civil War...
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/24/26 at 8:20 am to Smeg
quote:Not to mention, in many cases much more wealth.
people who are older, experienced more, learned more, and have accumulated more wisdom?
re: Pride night cancelled when minor league baseball team refuses to wear queer jerseys
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/18/26 at 7:47 pm to Night Vision
quote:
The team's club is now hosting a separate pride event without any baseball game.
re: Lutnick: Trump’s goal is 0 federal come taxes for those making < $150K.
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/17/26 at 9:55 pm to Harvey Vortac
quote:You read my mind.
Does that mean 300k per household?
re: Trump says he's considering having the trade deal with Mexico and Canada TERMINATED
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/17/26 at 4:43 pm to Ailsa
Stock market correction initiated.
re: Orange and blue make?
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/15/26 at 7:04 pm to WheyCheddar
Sabotage!
re: America is turning the corner and needs more of this.
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/14/26 at 11:19 am to Longdriver98
Let me help you with that…
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.re: The goal post has shifted. No longer a jury of your peers. Now it's a jury of your race
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/14/26 at 1:00 am to stout
The Constitution does not mention a “jury of your peers.”
What it does guarantee is the right to an impartial jury. An impartial jury is made up of people who have no personal stake in the outcome of the case and no meaningful connection to either the defendant or the victim.
The phrase “jury of your peers” is often misunderstood. If taken literally, a person’s peers could mean classmates, teammates, coworkers, fellow church members, or others from the same social circle. That is not what the Constitution requires.
The goal is not to seat people who know or identify with the defendant, but rather to seat jurors who can fairly evaluate the evidence without bias, prejudice, or personal involvement. In other words, they have no skin in the game and can render a verdict based solely on the facts presented in court.
What it does guarantee is the right to an impartial jury. An impartial jury is made up of people who have no personal stake in the outcome of the case and no meaningful connection to either the defendant or the victim.
The phrase “jury of your peers” is often misunderstood. If taken literally, a person’s peers could mean classmates, teammates, coworkers, fellow church members, or others from the same social circle. That is not what the Constitution requires.
The goal is not to seat people who know or identify with the defendant, but rather to seat jurors who can fairly evaluate the evidence without bias, prejudice, or personal involvement. In other words, they have no skin in the game and can render a verdict based solely on the facts presented in court.
re: Pratt voters (10s of 1000s) receiving rejection letters (their votes were not counted)
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/12/26 at 4:25 pm to scrooster
quote:
Platner voters (10s of 1000s) receiving rejection letters (their votes were not counted)
re: Does the 1980 October surprise story being validated change your views of Reagan?
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/12/26 at 4:19 pm to Sput
quote::lol:
Slow afternoon on Grindr for you Powerbottom?
re: Black women live in agony every day that I promise the Metcalfs had never lived through
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/12/26 at 6:50 am to Crimson K
quote:She’s also describing exactly what went down when Officer Darren Wilson put six in the “Gentle Giant”, Michael Brown.
Crocker said this, unintentionally supporting Zimmerman’s shooting of the angelic Trayvon from way back. Interesting.
Jerry Seinfeld Breaks a Palestine Supporter’s Heart
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/11/26 at 10:09 pm
re: Bring Us Your Memes: 2024 Election Day and Beyond
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/10/26 at 11:52 am to Kjnstkmn
FAFO - Don’t mess with a Marine!
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/5/26 at 12:21 pm
re: Bring Us Your Memes: 2024 Election Day and Beyond
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/5/26 at 12:16 am to Athis
re: Iran nuclear dust is the new Epstein files
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/5/26 at 12:15 am to Adam Banks
re: Black Liberals PANIC - Court REJECTS EVERY Black Juror For Karmelo Anthony Murder Trial.
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/4/26 at 11:54 pm to Timeoday
The Constitution does not mention a “jury of your peers.”
What it does guarantee is the right to an impartial jury. An impartial jury is made up of people who have no personal stake in the outcome of the case and no meaningful connection to either the defendant or the victim.
The phrase “jury of your peers” is often misunderstood. If taken literally, a person’s peers could mean classmates, teammates, coworkers, fellow church members, or others from the same social circle. That is not what the Constitution requires.
The goal is not to seat people who know or identify with the defendant, but rather to seat jurors who can fairly evaluate the evidence without bias, prejudice, or personal involvement. In other words, they have no skin in the game and can render a verdict based solely on the facts presented in court.
What it does guarantee is the right to an impartial jury. An impartial jury is made up of people who have no personal stake in the outcome of the case and no meaningful connection to either the defendant or the victim.
The phrase “jury of your peers” is often misunderstood. If taken literally, a person’s peers could mean classmates, teammates, coworkers, fellow church members, or others from the same social circle. That is not what the Constitution requires.
The goal is not to seat people who know or identify with the defendant, but rather to seat jurors who can fairly evaluate the evidence without bias, prejudice, or personal involvement. In other words, they have no skin in the game and can render a verdict based solely on the facts presented in court.
re: The Hood Rats show up at the Anthony trial
Posted by TigerVespamon on 6/3/26 at 1:49 pm to Breauxsif
quote:
These people are disgusting pigs. They will all pack the local Chili's, order waters with lemon, run their server all over the place requesting gallons of ranch dressing, send food back, ect ect and completely stiff their server because the server is white.
Popular
22
