TigerVespamon
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 7514 |
| Registered on: | 12/11/2010 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: What’s next for St George?
Posted by TigerVespamon on 5/16/26 at 9:59 pm to Adam Banks
How were Baker, Central, and Zachary able to pull it off?
1
re: Historic Palmetto cemetery vandalized with graffiti
Posted by TigerVespamon on 5/16/26 at 6:49 pm to Bernie Bierman
Who did the Southern Poverty Law Center pay to do this?
re: BLM leaders hold press conference on the crisis of Netflix allowing a George Floyd joke
Posted by TigerVespamon on 5/15/26 at 1:37 pm to L.A.
I was not aware of the joke. I found it on X and here it is. You’re welcome.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.re: Who’s the last Democrat you voted for in a state or national election?
Posted by TigerVespamon on 5/14/26 at 10:16 pm to Figgy
quote::lol:
never will until after I die.
re: How many planes did they have to bring to china for all those people and SUV’s
Posted by TigerVespamon on 5/13/26 at 9:25 pm to sidewalkside
42
re: Bring Us Your Memes: 2024 Election Day and Beyond
Posted by TigerVespamon on 5/10/26 at 7:35 pm to uggabugga
re: J6 Chairman - Rep. Bennie Thompson - calling for an insurrection and second Civil War
Posted by TigerVespamon on 5/7/26 at 9:44 pm to RandRules
quote:NO CHEST
In a civil war, we would be at a disadvantage.
re: J6 Chairman - Rep. Bennie Thompson - calling for an insurrection and second Civil War
Posted by TigerVespamon on 5/7/26 at 9:42 pm to RandRules
NO CHEST
re: Andy Serkis explains why he changed Orwell's iconic 'Animal Farm' ending for new movie
Posted by TigerVespamon on 5/2/26 at 6:55 am to lowhound
In 7th grade, I did a book report on “Animal Farm”, and even as a 12-year-old, I got the intended message.
Angel Studios being attached to this adaptation is a surprise to me. This is the same studio behind “The Chosen”. Seeing their name connected to something that feels so ideologically skewed is baffling. It doesn’t feel like a natural fit, and it raises questions about what direction they’re trying to go in.
Angel Studios being attached to this adaptation is a surprise to me. This is the same studio behind “The Chosen”. Seeing their name connected to something that feels so ideologically skewed is baffling. It doesn’t feel like a natural fit, and it raises questions about what direction they’re trying to go in.
re: Shootout in the hood with commentary from the porch
Posted by TigerVespamon on 4/30/26 at 9:41 pm to Crimson Wraith
Cultcha
re: House just voted against banning soda from SNAP
Posted by TigerVespamon on 4/30/26 at 9:36 pm to weagle1999
Just ban SNAP.
re: Downs Syndrome Obama Big Mad
Posted by TigerVespamon on 4/27/26 at 7:44 pm to Lsudx256
re: Dismantling of Islam with Jay Smith
Posted by TigerVespamon on 4/27/26 at 7:25 pm to ApexTiger
Once again, let me help you with that…
re: Dismantling of Islam with Jay Smith
Posted by TigerVespamon on 4/27/26 at 7:24 pm to ApexTiger
Let me help you with that…
re: New iconic Trump image just dropped
Posted by TigerVespamon on 4/26/26 at 8:26 pm to stout
Apparently, nobody in that room knows how to cast a video onto a larger screen.
re: How did this guy NOT get shot, if our SS is so damn great?
Posted by TigerVespamon on 4/26/26 at 5:19 pm to weagle1999
quote:
re: Obama: We don't know the details behind the motives of the shooter
Posted by TigerVespamon on 4/26/26 at 5:12 pm to stout
:bird:
re: Another innocent white girl lost to violence
Posted by TigerVespamon on 4/24/26 at 7:09 pm to ForTheWin81
quote:“But suppose the ox had a reputation for goring, and the owner had been informed but failed to keep it under control. If the ox then kills someone, it must be stoned, and the owner must also be put to death.” - Exodus 21:29 NLT
one of the shooters just shot a stolen gun in school 3 days before and judge let him out
It is not enough to point solely to the offender. While they must be held accountable for their actions, those who had the authority and the duty to prevent foreseeable harm cannot be absolved. Judges, parole boards, prosecutors, and policymakers who knowingly permit the release of habitual violent offenders must also bear the weight of their decisions, especially when those decisions result in tragedy.
Each act of violence committed by a known repeat offender does not happen in a vacuum. It follows a series of deliberate choices: to grant parole, to reduce sentences, to dismiss charges, or to overlook warning signs in the name of leniency, political pressure, or flawed ideologies. These choices are not without consequence. They are direct contributors to the circumstances that allow violence to be repeated.
Consider a parole board that releases an individual with a documented history of sexual assault, only for that person to reoffend within months. Can we truly say that the only one to blame is the assailant? Or does culpability extend to those who ignored the red flags, who gambled with public safety, and who chose hope over hard evidence?
If a mechanic knowingly sends a faulty car onto the road and someone is killed, they can be held liable. If a doctor ignores test results and a patient dies, they face consequences. Why, then, should those who knowingly unleash violent offenders onto the public face no responsibility when lives are lost?
Justice demands more than punishment. It demands accountability at every level. To ignore this truth is to devalue the lives of victims, and to accept a system where the gatekeepers of justice bear no burden for the outcomes of their decisions.
Those who hold the keys to freedom must also hold the weight of its consequences. Anything less is a betrayal of public trust and a sentence carried out on the innocent.
re: Landry regarding Mall shooting blames the Judges and the Parents and he's RIGHT
Posted by TigerVespamon on 4/24/26 at 6:41 pm to Wednesday
“But suppose the ox had a reputation for goring, and the owner had been informed but failed to keep it under control. If the ox then kills someone, it must be stoned, and the owner must also be put to death.” - Exodus 21:29 NLT
It is not enough to point solely to the offender. While they must be held accountable for their actions, those who had the authority and the duty to prevent foreseeable harm cannot be absolved. Judges, parole boards, prosecutors, and policymakers who knowingly permit the release of habitual violent offenders must also bear the weight of their decisions, especially when those decisions result in tragedy.
Each act of violence committed by a known repeat offender does not happen in a vacuum. It follows a series of deliberate choices: to grant parole, to reduce sentences, to dismiss charges, or to overlook warning signs in the name of leniency, political pressure, or flawed ideologies. These choices are not without consequence. They are direct contributors to the circumstances that allow violence to be repeated.
Consider a parole board that releases an individual with a documented history of sexual assault, only for that person to reoffend within months. Can we truly say that the only one to blame is the assailant? Or does culpability extend to those who ignored the red flags, who gambled with public safety, and who chose hope over hard evidence?
If a mechanic knowingly sends a faulty car onto the road and someone is killed, they can be held liable. If a doctor ignores test results and a patient dies, they face consequences. Why, then, should those who knowingly unleash violent offenders onto the public face no responsibility when lives are lost?
Justice demands more than punishment. It demands accountability at every level. To ignore this truth is to devalue the lives of victims, and to accept a system where the gatekeepers of justice bear no burden for the outcomes of their decisions.
Those who hold the keys to freedom must also hold the weight of its consequences. Anything less is a betrayal of public trust and a sentence carried out on the innocent.
It is not enough to point solely to the offender. While they must be held accountable for their actions, those who had the authority and the duty to prevent foreseeable harm cannot be absolved. Judges, parole boards, prosecutors, and policymakers who knowingly permit the release of habitual violent offenders must also bear the weight of their decisions, especially when those decisions result in tragedy.
Each act of violence committed by a known repeat offender does not happen in a vacuum. It follows a series of deliberate choices: to grant parole, to reduce sentences, to dismiss charges, or to overlook warning signs in the name of leniency, political pressure, or flawed ideologies. These choices are not without consequence. They are direct contributors to the circumstances that allow violence to be repeated.
Consider a parole board that releases an individual with a documented history of sexual assault, only for that person to reoffend within months. Can we truly say that the only one to blame is the assailant? Or does culpability extend to those who ignored the red flags, who gambled with public safety, and who chose hope over hard evidence?
If a mechanic knowingly sends a faulty car onto the road and someone is killed, they can be held liable. If a doctor ignores test results and a patient dies, they face consequences. Why, then, should those who knowingly unleash violent offenders onto the public face no responsibility when lives are lost?
Justice demands more than punishment. It demands accountability at every level. To ignore this truth is to devalue the lives of victims, and to accept a system where the gatekeepers of justice bear no burden for the outcomes of their decisions.
Those who hold the keys to freedom must also hold the weight of its consequences. Anything less is a betrayal of public trust and a sentence carried out on the innocent.
re: Missing F-15 Crew Member?
Posted by TigerVespamon on 4/4/26 at 11:18 am to samson73103
quote:Then more 4-D chess from POTUS.
wild goose chase
Missing F-15 Crew Member?
Posted by TigerVespamon on 4/4/26 at 11:10 am
In regard to the F-15 being shot down over Iran, why does our government feel it’s necessary to publicly say we’re still searching for one of the crew members? Wouldn’t it make more sense to simply report that both were rescued, potentially discouraging the enemy from continuing their own search?
Popular
20
