TigerVespamon

quote:

---

Yeah for sure. We should go back to proven methods that work.

---

quote:

---

Worst mistake LSU ever made….

---

Really? He’s the guy that brought the Joes (Burrow and Brady) to LSU.

quote:

---

the constant winding and rewinding and unwinding the tape back-and-forth is visually very annoying.

---

THIS!

BTW, love their OTB show, but I wonder if Matt suffers from ADD. That might explain the
back and forth
back and forth
back and forth

quote:

---

beat the brakes off them

---

Are you Mike Collins?

Credit: Evie Da from Facebook.

quote:

---

Oh, and how fat that turd Elko actually is.

---

quote:

---

Our society / government could punish criminals in ways that would serve as real deterrents.

---

“But suppose the ox had a reputation for goring, and the owner had been informed but failed to keep it under control. If the ox then kills someone, it must be stoned, and the owner must also be put to death.” - Exodus 21:29 NLT

It is not enough to point solely to the offender. While they must be held accountable for their actions, those who had the authority and the duty to prevent foreseeable harm cannot be absolved. Judges, parole boards, prosecutors, and policymakers who knowingly permit the release of habitual violent offenders must also bear the weight of their decisions, especially when those decisions result in tragedy.

Each act of violence committed by a known repeat offender does not happen in a vacuum. It follows a series of deliberate choices: to grant parole, to reduce sentences, to dismiss charges, or to overlook warning signs in the name of leniency, political pressure, or flawed ideologies. These choices are not without consequence. They are direct contributors to the circumstances that allow violence to be repeated.

Consider a parole board that releases an individual with a documented history of sexual assault, only for that person to reoffend within months. Can we truly say that the only one to blame is the assailant? Or does culpability extend to those who ignored the red flags, who gambled with public safety, and who chose hope over hard evidence?

If a mechanic knowingly sends a faulty car onto the road and someone is killed, they can be held liable. If a doctor ignores test results and a patient dies, they face consequences. Why, then, should those who knowingly unleash violent offenders onto the public face no responsibility when lives are lost?

Justice demands more than punishment. It demands accountability at every level. To ignore this truth is to devalue the lives of victims, and to accept a system where the gatekeepers of justice bear no burden for the outcomes of their decisions.

Those who hold the keys to freedom must also hold the weight of its consequences. Anything less is a betrayal of public trust and a sentence carried out on the innocent.