crazy4lsu

quote:

---

Which is a massive ringing endorsement for open borders.

---

Iran doesn't really have that much reach to get support from Muslims broadly. They originally posted the message in Persian, which is a limited regional language at this point, and represent a minority of Muslims in terms of sect. Iranians outside of Iran, unlike other countries, generally tend to be very secular.

quote:

---

they appear to have no had to play against our superior military

---

No, they've been preparing for a long time. The mosaic defense and the degree of independence each command has is something unlike other regional actors and more like Western militaries. Their goal is just survival. Their calculation is that they can survive the window of US interest in the region, given Trump's attention span.

quote:

---

On the other hand, in the Fortress Americas future, why let the Caliphate keep/get their foot in the door via Falklands

---

In this scenario, which is not really going to happen, the UK would already have unfettered access to the North Atlantic. Nothing in terms of what allowed the UK to become a preeminent seapower, in geopolitical terms, has changed other than the UK becoming a junior partner to the US. As in, they still have freedom to access the Atlantic with no way to limit that access, in contrast to a state like China.

The US and UK competed in that exact area when both were ostensibly aligned along cultural ties. In this supposed scenario of some caliphate, or any mildly competitive UK, why wouldn't the same hold true? I'm not understanding the belief that the Falklands is some sort of lynchpin to Western Hemisphere security. No one believes that.

No. Brazil actually has a burgeoning defense sector (which could, with the right investment, could eventually compete with the likes of Turkey and South Korea) and the Brazilians and the Argentinians have worked together on several projects. They are also on the same side with regards to the Falklands, but even then, Argentina doesn't really seem to possess the capability to project power that far, and I don't think the Brazilians would go so far as to ally directly in such a potential situation.

The truth is that Argentina has no pressing international security issues, or rather, security issues which require them to actually take procurement seriously.

Lol. Argentina is like two procurement cycles away from actually being competent and even then, there is no guarantee. The same problems that you tards accuse of Europe is actually true of Argentina. Years of underfunding, failed procurement, and almost no attention paid to the military in Argentine society makes it a much more complicated problem than simply 'arming' them.

quote:

---

if early symptoms go unrecognized and/or undiagnosed, your type of pathology does not allow for negative long term side effects of a drug or vaccine?

---

No. I am saying that there will be evidence of damage at the cellular level now even if in this hypothetical, there are some long-term effects. There are limited methods by which the human body eliminates toxic insults, and thus characteristic patterns of injury. I am saying that if you proclaim there are going to be long-term effects of one vaccination cycle, the evidence for such claims will already exist in the body.

quote:

---

Well what she is saying is that there have been 3 such cases across the US in the past week (two in Arizona and one in Ohio (I think?)) that were attributed to a fungal infection that has a less than 1% fatality rate and almost all of those deaths occur in elderly immunocompromised individuals.

---

Again, it depends on the actual cases. There are several scenarios I can think (such as immune injury when young, chronic infection, co-infection, genetic disorders, immune dysfunction, vague symptomology which hides how serious the infection actually is and on and on) that could potentially cause death in young people from fungal infections. Without a detailed history, it is impossible to ascertain the cause in a definitive sense.

quote:

---

So what's someone supposed to think when the official "cause of death" is obvious bullshite?

---

I mean, you aren't required to have an opinion on every little thing. Society might demand that we have disparate events fit into narrow worldviews, but in the spectrum of human experience, this has likely happened somewhere someplace before. The difference now is that we hear about it and can discuss it when we are far removed from the actual situation.

I can understand the notion that perhaps this is linked to something insidious, but until we see the pathology in each individual case and actually investigate, there is no way to actually link these together in a meaningful way.

quote:

---

I just noted that people like yourself would dismiss her opinion based on her being a nurse

---

Well, part of the issue is that nurses and doctors are trained differently. If I was trying to convince people that the vaccine was the cause of some condition, the way you would structure arguments, present evidence, gather data has to be a particular standard. Ultimately, it has to result in a consistent, reproducible symptomology. Everyone is free to make the style of argument which would most convince other people in the field, but they don't. The work, on a sentence level, is generally sloppy and when they do try to do a mimicry of the type of that argument structure, they give themselves away with wild statements which no serious person would make. Here, she makes no attempt to even reach that standard and just dismisses the stated reason outright. Why should I even take her argument seriously, without knowing anything about the patient?

quote:

---

But this is not the action of a neutral country.

---

We are neutral with respect to the Falklands issue. But we are far closer allies with the British. We have no such association with the Argentines and likely won't in the future.

Yeah dude. Either stop menstruating and stay on topic or continue whining that you misread my initial post so thoroughly that now I think you are retarded.