
Don Johnson
Favorite team: | |
Location: | |
Biography: | |
Interests: | |
Occupation: | |
Number of Posts: | 527 |
Registered on: | 12/2/2010 |
Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: This guy gets it, re Travel ball
Posted by Don Johnson on 3/26/25 at 1:37 pm
quote:
Well, once you turn your flat bill hat around the right way, i'd like to explain to you what "developmental" means, and what the goal of baseball at this age should be about, at least IMO.
I get you have your complaints, but address how one is more communist than the other.
re: This guy gets it, re Travel ball
Posted by Don Johnson on 3/26/25 at 11:16 am
quote:
Travel ball is the most anti American thing ever. You may as well be teaching your kids to suck communist dick
Rec ball - everyone makes the team. Everyone gets cupcakes, juice boxes and trophies at the end. Everyone plays at a community field funded by taxing the residents.
Travel ball - 8 years olds get cut, winners stay, losers go home, lots of money is made.
Both have their flaws, but one is very American and one is very communist.
re: This guy gets it, re Travel ball
Posted by Don Johnson on 3/26/25 at 10:07 am
I've had three boys play baseball
Oldest - played rec through 12U and did "All Stars" after the rec season for 3-4 tournaments. Played rec only in 12U, before quitting baseball. Just time for him to move on. That's an age where lots move on from baseball.
Middle - played rec through 12 U and did "All Stars" in 7 and 8U. In 9U, a dad formed a tournament team that was comprised of kids that still played rec. So, we played in tournaments throughout the year, but also all broke up and played rec. He did this through 12U before quitting baseball to focus on soccer and football.
Youngest - played rec through 8U and joined a baseball "organization" and plays strictly tournament baseball. (He also plays soccer, football and school basketball). I originally wanted this kid to follow a path more like my middle son. A mix between laid back but serious. But we didn't have the right dads to do this. To my surprise, our experience at an organization has been great. I realize that's not everyone's experience.
If we are being completely honest, playing just rec baseball isn't enough. I've had two kids play rec though 12U. Its like 10 games and the pitching is horrible and they probably have less than 10 real at bats where they get to swing a bat and probably about 10 balls that they have a chance to field.
That's just not enough. Those aren't real reps. The kids he will compete against later on are so far ahead of the rec kids that its crazy. Sure, you can give me an example of a great athlete that didn't play much until 13U. Those outliers exist. But for most normal kids, the ones that play rec aren't making the junior high team. They are too far behind.
When we were kids in the 80's, we played rec. But we also played with friends all the time. Those skills were being honed year round in fun ways. Kids don't do that anymore.
And also, if we're being honest, for the most part these HS teams today would kick your 1990's HS team's arse. They are better in every aspect. Its hard for kids to make the HS team if they aren't already very polished as a player. And those rec reps won't get them there.
Tournament baseball covers such a wide spectrum. You can find the right mix for your kid. There are teams that take it seriously and teams that don't. Teams that travel and those that don't. Teams that play in the Spring only and teams that play year round. Teams coached by dad or teams coached by high level coaches. Teams that costs $5,000 a year and teams that cost $500 a year.
As long as the kid enjoys it, that's all that matters.
Oldest - played rec through 12U and did "All Stars" after the rec season for 3-4 tournaments. Played rec only in 12U, before quitting baseball. Just time for him to move on. That's an age where lots move on from baseball.
Middle - played rec through 12 U and did "All Stars" in 7 and 8U. In 9U, a dad formed a tournament team that was comprised of kids that still played rec. So, we played in tournaments throughout the year, but also all broke up and played rec. He did this through 12U before quitting baseball to focus on soccer and football.
Youngest - played rec through 8U and joined a baseball "organization" and plays strictly tournament baseball. (He also plays soccer, football and school basketball). I originally wanted this kid to follow a path more like my middle son. A mix between laid back but serious. But we didn't have the right dads to do this. To my surprise, our experience at an organization has been great. I realize that's not everyone's experience.
If we are being completely honest, playing just rec baseball isn't enough. I've had two kids play rec though 12U. Its like 10 games and the pitching is horrible and they probably have less than 10 real at bats where they get to swing a bat and probably about 10 balls that they have a chance to field.
That's just not enough. Those aren't real reps. The kids he will compete against later on are so far ahead of the rec kids that its crazy. Sure, you can give me an example of a great athlete that didn't play much until 13U. Those outliers exist. But for most normal kids, the ones that play rec aren't making the junior high team. They are too far behind.
When we were kids in the 80's, we played rec. But we also played with friends all the time. Those skills were being honed year round in fun ways. Kids don't do that anymore.
And also, if we're being honest, for the most part these HS teams today would kick your 1990's HS team's arse. They are better in every aspect. Its hard for kids to make the HS team if they aren't already very polished as a player. And those rec reps won't get them there.
Tournament baseball covers such a wide spectrum. You can find the right mix for your kid. There are teams that take it seriously and teams that don't. Teams that travel and those that don't. Teams that play in the Spring only and teams that play year round. Teams coached by dad or teams coached by high level coaches. Teams that costs $5,000 a year and teams that cost $500 a year.
As long as the kid enjoys it, that's all that matters.
re: Severe weather this weekend March 14-15
Posted by Don Johnson on 3/14/25 at 8:13 am
Odds on flights coming into MSY tomorrow?
re: Multiple studies showing vaccines CAN cause autism
Posted by Don Johnson on 2/5/25 at 9:41 am
quote:
quote:
And polio.
lol, nobody's even gotten polio in 65 years.

re: The True History of the Jonestown Cult, WWII, and How Winston Churchill Ruined Europe
Posted by Don Johnson on 9/6/24 at 2:18 pm
quote:
What do you think he is saying?
I think its crystal clear that he's implying that the reason he can't find Hitler is because Hitler isn't in Hell.
re: Arkansas hit .278 at home against Missouri St last night
Posted by Don Johnson on 5/1/24 at 2:45 pm
quote:
If Schloss became aware of this a few weeks ago and that’s where the numbers are coming from, Arkansas is the culprit.
.299 at home now, but hit .240 vs UF to lower it from .306 (what Schloss says)
.211 on the road now, but hit .239 at USC to raise it from .206
Math doesn't check out on this.
re: IVF is about to be screwed
Posted by Don Johnson on 2/20/24 at 8:29 am
quote:
If you accidentally ran into a pregnant woman and ended her pregnancy, would it be crazy then? This is not really a tough logical stretch at all.
If you didn't run into the pregnant lady, a life would be born.
If you didn't drop the embryos, would a life be born?
re: Honest apolitical question. Covid.
Posted by Don Johnson on 9/6/23 at 12:58 pm
quote:
I think people are misreading this. I don't think they are saying pure bloods are safer than vaccinated. They are saying this new variant is capable of infecting the vaccinated more than previous variants were. And that's because it has mutated and we need updated vaccines. They are not saying vaccinated are at "more risk" than pure bloods.
At least that's how I am reading it. Nowhere did CDC say "the vaccinated are at more risk."
People need to stop using Charlie Kirk as a news source. He's toying with them and getting rich from it.
re: Why does the left get so triggered when secession is brought up?
Posted by Don Johnson on 3/9/23 at 10:42 am
quote:
First, tell me how these cities are going to feed themselves without these red areas.
By easily conquering/buying the red states.
re: Why does the left get so triggered when secession is brought up?
Posted by Don Johnson on 3/9/23 at 9:22 am
quote:
The poorest states, southern or elsewhere, will rank among the EU members in GDP
You've said that already. So they can all bind together and become as big as the Netherlands?
Is your new country going to also depend on the US to defend them?
re: Why does the left get so triggered when secession is brought up?
Posted by Don Johnson on 3/9/23 at 9:17 am
quote:
Remind me again, which party made folks dependent on the federal government? NOW you see that net negatives on the economy are a bad thing?
And when you look at federal aid per capita, the south is far behind the northeast and California.
I've always seen the net negatives from being dependent on the federal government.
You think I'm liberal? Because I'm anti-secession? What kind of f*cked up conversation is this?
Doesn't change the fact that southern states are dependent, partially because of policies, but also because they don't produce much.
re: Why does the left get so triggered when secession is brought up?
Posted by Don Johnson on 3/9/23 at 9:13 am
quote:
WRONG
Even the poorest states when we divorce this thing out would rank among the EU countries in GDP
Yet no where close to the remaining US states. Which is fine if that's your goal. Leave a world power to become the Netherlands.
re: Why does the left get so triggered when secession is brought up?
Posted by Don Johnson on 3/9/23 at 8:48 am
quote:
Wow, how heavy are those goalposts?
Take a look at which states have the largest GDP. Take a look at which states are most dependent on the federal government.
The only red states that are worth a damn from a production standpoint are Texas and Florida and both of those states are damn near purple and would never secede.
If MS, LA, AL, AR wanted to create their own nation - strictly from a production standpoint - the US government would say "Great, we are much better off. Those states were a negative to us financially. They took way more from us than they provided."
You think you're going to be able to create a map that cuts out big cities? Cool. Follow link below and tell me which of these counties are going to join your new country? Then tell me how in the world your new country is going to be able to support itself without the vast majority of these cities.
LINK
re: Why does the left get so triggered when secession is brought up?
Posted by Don Johnson on 3/8/23 at 7:05 pm
You wouldn’t get close to 50% in Texas or Florida. Most Republicans are Americans first. This is crazy talk.
re: Why does the left get so triggered when secession is brought up?
Posted by Don Johnson on 3/8/23 at 5:16 pm
quote:
Uhhh...the people that are a net positive to the economy with regards to what they provide versus what they take?
So not most southern states.
re: Why does the left get so triggered when secession is brought up?
Posted by Don Johnson on 3/8/23 at 4:21 pm
quote:
100M?? What?
If 100M need to move, people need to damn well analyse the impact of their current votes.
Yes, there are over 100M people that live in states where they are a different political ideology than the majority of the state.
That's kind of the beauty of the USA.
re: Why does the left get so triggered when secession is brought up?
Posted by Don Johnson on 3/8/23 at 4:14 pm
quote:
already did it, but too rough at this point
LOL
quote:
it would work itself out
No. No, it wouldn't.
Not when 47% of Texas voted for Biden. Or when 48% of Florida voted for Biden. Or when Georgia is 50/50.
And good luck with your new country without California, Texas, Florida or New York.
re: Why does the left get so triggered when secession is brought up?
Posted by Don Johnson on 3/8/23 at 3:53 pm
quote:
Because their entire value system collapses when you remove the half of the country that actually produces. See the current state of the Soviet Union...oh, wait...
Who exactly is doing the producing you speak of?
re: Why does the left get so triggered when secession is brought up?
Posted by Don Johnson on 3/8/23 at 3:46 pm
quote:
a good reason for keeping the split peaceful and orderly
You propose that 140 million people move to a new state than the one they currently live in?
Popular