Favorite team:Texas A&M 
Location:New Braunfels
Biography:A recovering journalist gone over to the dark side of media relations. Currently writing a book on the infamous La Grange Chicken Ranch.
Interests:
Occupation:Media relations, writer
Number of Posts:63
Registered on:11/30/2010
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Texas vs Texas A&M Sugar Bowl

Posted by Sabreman on 10/10/21 at 10:01 pm
quote:

tu is going to the Alamo Bowl like they always do.

To be fair, the River Walk is lovely in December.
quote:

Best win of your entire life as an Aggy fan and concern #1 is if Texas is jealous or not.

I've seen the sip message boards. There's no ambiguity. They jealous.
quote:

Nice work sarge but it would had made more sense if Alabama was the guy being picked on. Texas isn't in the SEC.

You don't understand, sip. Alabama's just a means to an end. Your humiliation is the goal. Always has been, always will be.
quote:

That’s not how it works.

Texas works by getting Texas alums or puppets into positions of power and then working to benefit just Texas.

They didn’t buy off the NCAA infractions committee, they leveraged connections to get an alum installed as head of the committee, then went to work on rivals.

They didn’t just throw their weight around the B12, they installed their own sycophants as the commissioner and positions of power, and then played stupid when the conference organization bent the field to their benefit.


This. They don't go for the frontal assault unless they know they've already won. Everything else is the long game with them, backroom deal, alliances, partnerships. They're exceptionally good at lobbying for conference rule changes that benefit everyone... except in the long run, they benefit more than anyone.
Must watch with the captions turned on. Some choice commentary there.

re: I know Aggie won’t admit it but

Posted by Sabreman on 7/23/21 at 9:55 am
quote:

That may be a deal point to buy an Aggie “yes.” I’m sure Sankey wants it 14-0.

It needs to be more than just that. After the tea-sips talked shite about how terrible the SEC was for the past decade? There needs to be a pound of flesh in this deal.
quote:

I would not trust that source. The SEC doesn't want lawsuits and won't reach out to anyone first. That was the policy under Slive and I don't know why that would have changed. It is like how there were rumors about some schools not wanting A&M and Missouri but the vote was reported as unanimous.


THIS. OU and t.u. reached out to the SEC, just as A&M, and OU and Mizzou reached out back in 2010. The SEC will not leave itself open to tortious interference lawsuits. Clemson and other East Coast schools may be trying to get into the SEC, but they will have made the first move. That's a good position for the SEC to be in, actually.
quote:


If MIZZOU goes to the BIG 10, which I think they tried before

Circa 2010-2011, Mizzou COULD NOT SHUT UP about how their "real" rivals were in the B1G and they were ditching the Big 12 for the industrial midwest, frickyouverymuch.

Then the B1G said, "I think not."

Mizzou was left scrambling to get a SEC bid as a consolation prize. No doubt whatsoever they'd bolt for the B1G in a heartbeat if offered.
quote:


The PAC12 has historically been resistant to having religious affiliated schools

I dunno. Baylor's history of enabling and covering up corruption, prostitution and murder may have sufficiently distanced them from the religious school stigma.

re: Have to give Ags and Mizzou credit

Posted by Sabreman on 7/23/21 at 9:23 am
quote:

There will be retaliation on the east side of the conference by attempting to add FSU or some other dipshits as an FU.

Dude, no. Just don't. If the East Division schools are for this, it's because the addition of t.u. and OU brings the conference up to the magic number of 16. Their in-state rivals will be forever shut out an they won't have to fret about their so-called "gentlemen's agreement" again. Throwing A&M under the bus solves their problem permanently.

re: Have to give Ags and Mizzou credit

Posted by Sabreman on 7/23/21 at 9:21 am
quote:

I just don't see Texas being able to humble themselves to try to fit in to our SEC family.

"We ARE the Jonses!" is t.u.'s unofficial motto. "Humble" is nowhere to be found in it.
quote:

A&M and LSU have a good thing going now.

A&M and LSU had good things going in the past, too. The difference now is that LSU can't run away when A&M starts winning.

re: I know Aggie won’t admit it but

Posted by Sabreman on 7/23/21 at 9:16 am
I want some of what you're smoking. You have no idea how wired Kyle Field will be. Here's the deal: It's popular among New Army to poo-poo playing the sips, because they've never done it. They don't know how annoying hearing "I've Been Working On The Railroad" and "Texas Bites" can get. They don't understand why Bonfire was a thing. They don't grok.

Old Army has always wanted to play them. t.u. got pissy we blew up their Pac deal and insisted they couldn't play A&M because we were in separate conferences, nevermind they played OU from 1918-1996 when they were in separate conferences.

Most of us want to play them every year on Thanksgiving, as God intended. We just don't want their toxicity in this conference. Full stop.
quote:

We don't roll over for fricking Texas

Funny, that's what Nebraska said.
quote:


My gut tells me to tell Texas to go EAD and GFY. They kill everything they touch.

This. Don't say we didn't warn you. The scorpion stings you despite all the promises in the world. It's in his nature.
quote:


I’m still waiting for someone to tell me how their behavior in a Texas based conference will translate in a conference where they will be just one of the guys.

That's just it--they won't be just one of the guys. Their unofficial motto is "We ARE the Jonese." You say, "Oh, the SEC schools won't let anyone come in here and boss us around." This is true. But the sips won't try to come in and boss everyone around. They'll play nice at first, then after a few years start proposing various bylaw reforms that sound reasonable and look to benefit everyone. After a while, you'll start to notice they benefit everyone but t.u. always benefits a bit more. Then some rules pass that unexpectedly start harming some member schools. The t-sips may not have introduced such bylaws or policies, but they always champion and support them, often in the name of "academic integrity." Ask yourself how Nebraska went from being a perennial national power to an also-ran in less than a decade. Look to the Big 12's partial qualifier policies. How did the SWC break up? Look at changes to the league's revenue distribution in the 1980s. The Big 12's renegotiated league revenue distribution twice over the past 20 years, and each time t.u. has come away with a bigger piece of the pie.

They'll bring glitz and glam and boost TV ratings, sure, but inside of 10 years they'll be stirring up trouble, because they always have and always will believe the SEC is beneath them.
quote:

This is the SEC tho, you play nice or you get the frick out.

Period.

Yes, the long list of schools expelled from the SEC gives weight to your words.
OU would be a solid addition that makes a lot of financial sense. Doubly so if it could be paired with an East Coast school, like VA Tech. You know good and well it wasn't OU that ran Nebraska out of the Big 12 or broke up the SWC.

re: Not trolling, Potential NO Votes?

Posted by Sabreman on 7/22/21 at 4:53 pm
quote:

If Texas could destroy Nebraska who won 3 NC's in 4 years do you honestly think they can't destroy any other SEC school? It won't happen overnight but it will happen, they play for keeps.


This. SEC folks don't get it. Yes, sips will come swaggering in waving their arrogance in everyone's face and likely get stomped on the field. That's not how they play the long game. 40 Acres is really, really good at supporting league bylaws that sound attractive, that appear to benefit every conference member, but in the long run tend to benefit the sips significantly more than anyone else. They build coalitions and are extremely persuasive. The initiatives they support always seem reasonable and fair, until 10 years down the road it turns out they sold everyone on an ACC-style cable package.

Aggressor's right. Give it 10 years and there will be off-field dissent and animosity like you wouldn't believe. SEC's famed unity would be in tatters.
quote:

They aren't moving the SEC offices out of Alabama. They aren't replacing the staff with Texas alum. Texas would be in for a rude awakening if they joined the SEC. The college football world doesn't revolve around them. Certainly not in the SEC


Guys, you just don't get it. Yes, t-sips are as arrogant as Tide fans with more money. But that's not the problem. t.u. is very, very good at getting conferences to adopt bylaws that appear to benefit everyone, but in the long run turn out to benefit the sips more. They operate in the boardrooms, behind the scenes. They're especially effective when their teams stink, because nobody views them as a threat then. Do you think it's a coincidence that Nebraska rapidly faded from national prominence after the formation of the Big 12? Hardly. Look into the rules changes on partial qualifiers the t-sips championed. That's the way they operate.