Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Denver
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:7175
Registered on:11/1/2010
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: What does Fehoka know

Posted by Jakesonaplane on 11/12/25 at 4:23 pm to
Fehoka? He posts here and his name is in his handles on every platform. How can you still mess it up?

re: Please please offensive minded

Posted by Jakesonaplane on 11/8/25 at 10:40 pm to
Alex Golesh and his 40-60 point offense
This is like saying Saban might have left Bama if he was close to the university president who left during their heyday
quote:

Let me know if I can pass anything along to him.


This is the nearest location to his house

U-Haul
My grandma could coach better than Kelly is right now and she’s dead.

re: Mike Mcdaniels for OC

Posted by Jakesonaplane on 10/19/25 at 10:12 pm to
Money would be similar so his options are Call nfl plays or call college plays and have to recruit. I see no reason for him to want a college OC job

Diane Keaton dead at 79

Posted by Jakesonaplane on 10/11/25 at 2:05 pm
Definitely not on my upcoming celebrity death radar. Sad

LINK
What about the throws into triple coverage just last week alone? Those were terrible decisions

re: Summed up in one image

Posted by Jakesonaplane on 6/18/25 at 10:31 pm to
Is this a picture of Arkansas collection of national championship trophies?
Watching it again now. Pearson just struck out.
Exactly. That’s what detractors point to is market cap. So I looked into the people who explain why market cap doesn’t matter with XRP. I do not think it’s going to $10,000 but I believe it will go up a considerable amount from its $2.37 per coin right now. This info below is what I read that makes me see the potential.

TL;DR: XRP could hit $100 because its utility drives demand, and market cap is irrelevant for utility coins. As adoption grows and XRP becomes integral to global finance, its price will reflect its role, not its supply. Market cap is just a number-it doesn't define the true value of a utility token like XRP
I see a lot of people dismissing the idea of XRP reaching $100 because of "market cap," but here's the thing: market cap isn't the ultimate metric for utility coins. Let me explain why XRP's value could rise significantly despite its large supply.

Utility > Market Cap
XRP is a utility token, meaning its value is tied to its use case, not speculation. XRP is designed to facilitate cross-border payments, liquidity, and settlement for financial institutions. If institutions globally adopt XRP for transferring trillions of dollars daily, its price will rise naturally, because the demand for XRP will outpace its supply.
Market cap is simply a math equation: price x supply. It's not a hard ceiling that limits a coin's price. For utility coins like XRP, what really matters is how much demand their utility generates. If XRP is essential for moving global money efficiently, its price could easily rise regardless of market cap.

Global Money Movement is Massive
The global cross-border payment market processes trillions of dollars annually. XRP is positioned as a bridge currency to reduce friction and costs in these transactions. The potential market for XRP's utility is enormous.
If XRP becomes a key player in settling even a fraction of global payments, the volume and demand for XRP will skyrocket. At that point, the concept of market cap becomes irrelevant because XRP's price reflects its role in the global financial system.
High Price is Necessary for XRP's Functionality For XRP to be effective in large-scale payments, its price needs to increase. Why? Because higher prices mean less XRP is needed to settle large transactions. Imagine moving $10 trillion in cross-border payments-at $1 per XRP, you'd need 10 trillion XRP. At $100 per XRP, you'd only need 100 billion.
This efficiency is critical for financial institutions using
XRP as a bridge asset. The higher the price, the more efficient the system becomes.

Market Cap is a Misleading Metric for Utility Coins
Market cap makes sense for stocks or speculative assets, but it's not a meaningful metric for utility tokens. Utility coins derive their value from their adoption and usage within their ecosystem. If XRP is solving real-world problems, its price can rise regardless of market cap, because the demand is based on function, not speculation.
The argument is that xrp’s value will not be tied to its market cap but rather its adoption and utility. I have a feeling this is gonna be a fun thread to bump in a few years no matter which way it goes
That has actually been a concern in the XRP community for a number of years. What if institutions use XRP for testing and then launch their own centralized alternatives like JPM Coin, various CBDCs, or several proprietary bank settlement layers?

The counterargument is that XRP has already built liquidity corridors and regulatory clarity (at least in some regions), making it a viable settlement layer for institutions that don’t want to reinvent the wheel. However, if the biggest players decide to go their own way, retail could end up having funded R&D without seeing the expected adoption.

This is still a gamble at the end of the day and not a sure thing. I love to gamble and honestly I’m betting the farm that XRP will rise to a cost per coin high enough for me to exit with my bag before something like this ever happens. I don’t plan to hodl forever like some people who believe XRP will actually replace the dollar and become the de facto currency in the future

I will say that’s fair if true but when the lawsuit from the SEC is dropped XRP adoption and use will overtake JPM.


From Reddit since I haven’t read too much about JPM coin

XRP is deemed not a security and JPM coin is specifically a security. Competing banks/creditors aren't going to want to use it. You become reliant on that company/tech which could potentially be a risk to your business model and provides your competitor, JPMorgan, with even more power. A third party company handling cross border payments and micro transactions would benefit all financial institutions equally. JPMC is only available to JPM customers/clients, which shakes out rival competition/numerous other large banks.
XRP is a neutral asset and, therefore, the corporate concern of providing power to a rival via use of their project or, contrarily, strategic vulnerability for using a rival's product is vastly reduced.

quote:

People fantasized it would replace swift. However swift is rolling out instant transactions this year and has already demonstrated this technology


I would read this article but in short, SWIFT’s upgrades are insufficient

Nine Reasons Why XRP Will Replace SWIFT
Right now if you want to move $50,000,000 from one bank here to one in Japan it will take 1-3 days and the cost is like $50 or more. With XRP it will take 3-5 seconds and cost something like $0.002. The higher the cost of each coin the less coins are needed per transaction and the more smooth the system will run. The thing to understand about XRP is that it was not made for retail investment or use. It was made for institutional use and transactions. It will likely replace the SWIFT banking system and if it does that would be quadrillions of dollars. This is one of the factors the instagram crypto nerds use to justify or explain how it will get to $10,000 a coin.