doogles02
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | Olla, LA |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 185 |
| Registered on: | 9/1/2010 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Oregon's almost interception
Posted by doogles02 on 9/8/11 at 10:58 am
quote:
Yes, this was their excuse du jour as to why they lost THAT game...
Actually a few of them had made comments under one of the articles on the PAC 12 Blog before the LSU/OU game and that group actually believed that they lost the game because of scheduled TV timeouts. Saying that the timeouts gave AU's defense a break and they were not able to run the tempo they normally run which caused them at least 14 points. I hope they do realize there are scheduled TV timeouts on quite a few of the games they play each year and this is part of the game in the 21st century just like their flashy shitty looking uniforms.
These OU fans are the most delusional fans I have ever seen in my life, no one even comes close to how freaking crazy they are.
They can't admit that the better team won the game or that LSU knocked the ball out of their hands on the turnovers and that they did not cough it up. I've heard some say that they got beat by a horrible LSU team because they played such a terrible game.
It's just really irritating how retarded these people are and that they don't understand how to play any kind of football other than on a freaking playstation. They smoke way too much reefer.
0
re: Oregon's almost interception
Posted by doogles02 on 9/8/11 at 10:42 am
The guy knew that the ball hit the ground, it was actually smart what he did. He knew it hit the ground so he got up and ran with the ball to take everyone's mind off of whether he caught it clean or not and only think why is this guy running down the field after he was on the ground. He did a little acting to divert everyone's attention to something else, it's more common in sports than you would think or notice.
re: Jarrett Lee; Oregon game passing chart
Posted by doogles02 on 9/4/11 at 8:53 pm
Also, they're DBs weren't just slapping balls away but they were in good position on our receivers almost all night. Lee was also getting rid of the ball as they were breaking on their routes a hell of a lot better than last year.
And most of you are right he was somewhere between average and good last night but QB play was way below average last year. 7 TDs and 10 INTs is pathetic for as much as JJ played, get real if you don't think Lee can do better than that.
And most of you are right he was somewhere between average and good last night but QB play was way below average last year. 7 TDs and 10 INTs is pathetic for as much as JJ played, get real if you don't think Lee can do better than that.
re: Jarrett Lee; Oregon game passing chart
Posted by doogles02 on 9/4/11 at 8:53 pm
Also, they're DBs weren't just slapping balls away but they were in good position on our receivers almost all night. Lee was also getting rid of the ball as they were breaking on their routes a hell of a lot better than last year.
And most of you are right he was somewhere between average and good last night but QB play was way below average last year. 7 TDs and 10 INTs is pathetic for as much as JJ played, get real if you don't think Lee can do better than that.
And most of you are right he was somewhere between average and good last night but QB play was way below average last year. 7 TDs and 10 INTs is pathetic for as much as JJ played, get real if you don't think Lee can do better than that.
re: Jarrett Lee; Oregon game passing chart
Posted by doogles02 on 9/4/11 at 8:50 pm
I thought he played very well and his receivers have to make plays as well. It's not a one way street. At least 3 or 4 more balls could have been caught if the receivers would have put forth the effort that anyone of the defensive players put out last night.
He ran the offense and looked calm on every play except for the sack.
He didn't hang his head and have that sour arse look that JJ had half the time last year. It may be that the system has been simplified a bit more from last year which is what was needed but it looks like they are very close to being a better than average passing team. He also made some good throws when they were needed most.
Also Jefferson admitted in a article before the brawl happened that he did not like the play calls that were called and didn't want to run them and that he would not do that this year. Do you really want to hear that from the guy that is supposed to be your senior leader, you run what your coach wants to run. Give some input to the coach and call audibles as necessary and as practiced but if you're a leader you don't pout about it.
He ran the offense and looked calm on every play except for the sack.
He didn't hang his head and have that sour arse look that JJ had half the time last year. It may be that the system has been simplified a bit more from last year which is what was needed but it looks like they are very close to being a better than average passing team. He also made some good throws when they were needed most.
Also Jefferson admitted in a article before the brawl happened that he did not like the play calls that were called and didn't want to run them and that he would not do that this year. Do you really want to hear that from the guy that is supposed to be your senior leader, you run what your coach wants to run. Give some input to the coach and call audibles as necessary and as practiced but if you're a leader you don't pout about it.
re: our little ball of hate
Posted by doogles02 on 9/4/11 at 6:03 pm
You are suggesting he help an Oregon player get off their arse when their fans and players booed everytime an LSU player was down on the field, really??
They also were hopping around on the center of the field like it were their stadium before game and LSU showed a lil respect by doing it on their side of the field.
Go to the PAC-12 Blog on ESPN with the rest of the guys who have never played football before and think that OU lost because they made some many offensive mistakes and that LSU's defense and physical play did not create those.
Also James and Thomas both would not mention LSU's defense beat their arse and only mentioned they did not win because of mental mistakes.
They showed no respect before, during, or after the game. Now if it were an opponent that equally respected us then I would say talk shite if you can back up and yeah maybe help the guy up every now and then if they return the favor.
Every hit they took and every word that was said to them was well deserved. I wished Loston would have put his shoulder in number 80s jaw when he got called for the personal foul.
They also were hopping around on the center of the field like it were their stadium before game and LSU showed a lil respect by doing it on their side of the field.
Go to the PAC-12 Blog on ESPN with the rest of the guys who have never played football before and think that OU lost because they made some many offensive mistakes and that LSU's defense and physical play did not create those.
Also James and Thomas both would not mention LSU's defense beat their arse and only mentioned they did not win because of mental mistakes.
They showed no respect before, during, or after the game. Now if it were an opponent that equally respected us then I would say talk shite if you can back up and yeah maybe help the guy up every now and then if they return the favor.
Every hit they took and every word that was said to them was well deserved. I wished Loston would have put his shoulder in number 80s jaw when he got called for the personal foul.
re: David Pollack
Posted by doogles02 on 9/4/11 at 4:57 pm
If you actually listened to what he said he was not being a smartarse. He thought that Lee played a good game by not forcing the ball, making good decisions, and he threw the ball well. He had 4 or 5 dropped balls, which if at least 2 or 3 those would have been caught, you all might have noticed he played a good game not great but a good solid game and did exactly what the LSU offensive game plan required. We never looked like dumbarses on offense last night and have every game at some point for the last three years.
re: Can you imagine how good this team would be with a good QB?
Posted by doogles02 on 9/4/11 at 2:33 pm
Go play nintendo dude! Stats do not mean everything, the most important last night were time of possesion and turnovers, that's the LSU style of football and has been the last 10 years, wake up. Yes we've had good offenses but what has been the most consistent, managing game on offense and great defense.
He had a good game, exactly what Miles and his OC wanted. But I guess you know more about football than they do. Could he have played better, yes but so could every football player that ever stepped on the field. Every play was not perfect but the results of the game overall was perfect, they scored more than their opponent!
He had a good game, exactly what Miles and his OC wanted. But I guess you know more about football than they do. Could he have played better, yes but so could every football player that ever stepped on the field. Every play was not perfect but the results of the game overall was perfect, they scored more than their opponent!
re: Can you imagine how good this team would be with a good QB?
Posted by doogles02 on 9/4/11 at 2:24 pm
Threw off his back foot huh? You do realize when they throw off their backfoot it usually causes the ball to float over the WR's head. How many balls were thrown over a receiver's head last night?
I saw him throw one off backfoot which was the one he floated out of bounds.
He also knew how to throw the ball to RR on the TD pass, JJ has been trying to figure that out for 3 years. Lee threw it to where RR was the only one able to catch it. Peyton Manning would not have completed but maybe 2 more passes if given the same play calls with the receivers not coming down with the ball like they did.
He missed on about 3 passes, one to Ford that was thrown to outside not inside, one that was thrown to Peterson's back shoulder but still got his hand on it, and one that was slightly behind Clement on the left hand side the first or second drive of game that he was able to get both hands on. Maybe one other bad play from Lee but not a bad throw on the deep route thrown to Reuben on Lee's left, but that was miscommunication, either RR ran the wrong route or Lee threw for the wrong route.
I saw some OU receivers last night make a couple catches that were thrown behind them so it's not impossible to make up for a minor error by your QB sometimes. Get your hands on it, you catch it unless it is knocked out of your hand.
A completion takes more than just a QB,
Yes Lee did not play great, he did exactly what he was suppose to do, play good. He was not given the play calls and was not needed to play great.
I saw him throw one off backfoot which was the one he floated out of bounds.
He also knew how to throw the ball to RR on the TD pass, JJ has been trying to figure that out for 3 years. Lee threw it to where RR was the only one able to catch it. Peyton Manning would not have completed but maybe 2 more passes if given the same play calls with the receivers not coming down with the ball like they did.
He missed on about 3 passes, one to Ford that was thrown to outside not inside, one that was thrown to Peterson's back shoulder but still got his hand on it, and one that was slightly behind Clement on the left hand side the first or second drive of game that he was able to get both hands on. Maybe one other bad play from Lee but not a bad throw on the deep route thrown to Reuben on Lee's left, but that was miscommunication, either RR ran the wrong route or Lee threw for the wrong route.
I saw some OU receivers last night make a couple catches that were thrown behind them so it's not impossible to make up for a minor error by your QB sometimes. Get your hands on it, you catch it unless it is knocked out of your hand.
A completion takes more than just a QB,
Yes Lee did not play great, he did exactly what he was suppose to do, play good. He was not given the play calls and was not needed to play great.
re: Can you imagine how good this team would be with a good QB?
Posted by doogles02 on 9/4/11 at 1:50 pm
Thank you SMD it would be nice to have some better receivers but they are young and they were all jacked up last night which makes it a little harder to have soft hands. They will come around and all the dumb arses that don't know football will realize Lee was not the problem last night.
And yes they should have thrown to Reuben more but you do realize a QB has progressions to go through and he is taught to throw it to the first one if they are open so the coach might should have called a few more plays for Reuben. Yes Reuben was one on one a few times last night but when it's 3rd and 12, you hit the receiver in the numbers that's breaking across the middle for a 13-14 yard gain just like Lee did but they did not come down with catch. He threw almost every pass so that only a LSU guy could catch it without throwing it at their feet.
But to you picky bastards that are never happy, you do realize Lee only made about 2-3 bad plays that did not result in a mistake last night. He made the smart throws and was the most calm QB we had in the pocket since Matt Flynn, looked very comfortable and did not hold onto the ball too long like that piece of shite QB in jail.
His receivers had some drops that would have made him look like a freaking all sec QB last night if they could catch a softly thrown but tight spiral that hits their freaking hands.
I was very impressed with Lee, give the guy some freaking credit for wanting to play for you WHINEY arse BASTARDS THAT CAN'T EVALUATE shite ABOUT FOOTBALL!! You know they do not need a QB that throws for tons of yards every game.
Ask Oregon why they can't beat LSU, AUBURN, or BOISE ST. I will tell you it's because Oregon lives in a fantasy world like half of you that the only thing you know about football is how to play the freaking Xbox or Playstation. You when football in the real world with fundamentals like an NFL team by blocking, tackling, running the football and playing defense, how many win the superbowl with poor defense. The Saints won the superbowl not because of their offense but because they played defense and created turnovers.
LSU plays their best athletes on defense and that's why Darron Thomas would be a DB at LSU.
And yes they should have thrown to Reuben more but you do realize a QB has progressions to go through and he is taught to throw it to the first one if they are open so the coach might should have called a few more plays for Reuben. Yes Reuben was one on one a few times last night but when it's 3rd and 12, you hit the receiver in the numbers that's breaking across the middle for a 13-14 yard gain just like Lee did but they did not come down with catch. He threw almost every pass so that only a LSU guy could catch it without throwing it at their feet.
But to you picky bastards that are never happy, you do realize Lee only made about 2-3 bad plays that did not result in a mistake last night. He made the smart throws and was the most calm QB we had in the pocket since Matt Flynn, looked very comfortable and did not hold onto the ball too long like that piece of shite QB in jail.
His receivers had some drops that would have made him look like a freaking all sec QB last night if they could catch a softly thrown but tight spiral that hits their freaking hands.
I was very impressed with Lee, give the guy some freaking credit for wanting to play for you WHINEY arse BASTARDS THAT CAN'T EVALUATE shite ABOUT FOOTBALL!! You know they do not need a QB that throws for tons of yards every game.
Ask Oregon why they can't beat LSU, AUBURN, or BOISE ST. I will tell you it's because Oregon lives in a fantasy world like half of you that the only thing you know about football is how to play the freaking Xbox or Playstation. You when football in the real world with fundamentals like an NFL team by blocking, tackling, running the football and playing defense, how many win the superbowl with poor defense. The Saints won the superbowl not because of their offense but because they played defense and created turnovers.
LSU plays their best athletes on defense and that's why Darron Thomas would be a DB at LSU.
re: How much improvement do you expect in your offense?
Posted by doogles02 on 6/12/11 at 2:20 pm
quote:
He really hasn't gotten all that many opportunities to shine. He's still just a wildcard, and doesn't get me any more excited than several other LSU RBs. That's all I'm saying.
When it comes to listing players on the roster who are reasons why LSU will be awesome this year, I don't think he makes my top 15.
Ware looked solid everytime he stepped on the field last year. The Cotton Bowl was just his breakout game. If he's not in your top 15 or even top 10 reasons to be excited about the season then you lack the skill of evaluating good running backs. I understand the skepticism with the things have worked out in the past with former running backs, for example Justin Vincent, but Ware has been hyped since he came to LSU and he stepped on the field in the bowl game and showed why. Also he proved even more how good of an athlete he is on the baseball field this spring.
re: College Football Live Round table discusses #4 LSU Tomorrow
Posted by doogles02 on 5/26/11 at 8:12 pm
Craig James is a moron, he firsts says what a great hire Krags will be and how much he will help QBs and so forth.
Immediately after, within the same sentence he asks how can they be ranked #4 and how he just does not understand how LSU can be expected to be ranked so high with the transition at Offensive Coordinator.
Obviously he hasn't done his research because Krags has stated he is not bringing in a new system and that he was just going to simplify the current one. Also the last time we brought in a new OC we won the title so I don't understand him using this as his excuse for them not being ranked so high.
I know how we always say ESPN hates LSU but it was quite obvious that he just does not like this LSU team and was looking for any reason not to have them ranked at #4. That and him continually asking the others how they could be ranked #4.
Immediately after, within the same sentence he asks how can they be ranked #4 and how he just does not understand how LSU can be expected to be ranked so high with the transition at Offensive Coordinator.
Obviously he hasn't done his research because Krags has stated he is not bringing in a new system and that he was just going to simplify the current one. Also the last time we brought in a new OC we won the title so I don't understand him using this as his excuse for them not being ranked so high.
I know how we always say ESPN hates LSU but it was quite obvious that he just does not like this LSU team and was looking for any reason not to have them ranked at #4. That and him continually asking the others how they could be ranked #4.
re: If this Sh!t doesnt get you ready for
Posted by doogles02 on 4/19/11 at 10:09 pm
Yeah, cool video, but come on Lil Jon is annoying these days
re: Washinton
Posted by doogles02 on 4/19/11 at 10:02 pm
Here's some other future notable OOC games
TCU in 2013
Arizona state in 2015 and 2016
NC St in 2017 and 2020
Okie in 2018 and 2019
TCU in 2013
Arizona state in 2015 and 2016
NC St in 2017 and 2020
Okie in 2018 and 2019
re: Washinton
Posted by doogles02 on 4/19/11 at 9:58 pm
It's amazing what a google search can do for you
re: Regarding expectations for Mett
Posted by doogles02 on 4/19/11 at 9:57 pm
Thank You, exactly.... If you're the so-called leader you should take control and want to be in those situations to have a chance to win at the end of game.
re: Regarding expectations for Mett
Posted by doogles02 on 4/19/11 at 9:50 pm
You're right, I believe he did play one or two series in that game
re: Regarding expectations for Mett
Posted by doogles02 on 4/19/11 at 9:46 pm
quote:
That jefferson as a game manager got me. Jefferson is not and will not ever be a game manager. Mett is better right now than either of the other two. This D-1 crap is getting tiresome. You guys act like Mett is some guy straight out of high school. You know this isnt the case.
I agree, if he was a game manager we would have been undefeated last year. He is what I would refer to as a "game mis-manager". (Yes that's cheesy)
And you'll have to excuse them about Mett, they heard someone else use the argument in one of the 1,000 threads on the topic and can not come up with anything else to say but "he has not taken a D1 snap".
I do however think that Miles will start JJ unless Mett is just leaps and bounds ahead of him in fall practice but I certainly would feel more comfortable giving someone new a chance. I don't think these people realize, but what do we have to lose besides half-arse mediocre play from JJ?
Yes I understand we have a chance to go undefeated and you will probably argue that we have that to lose by playing Mett, but come on your delusional if you really think the QB play could be any worse if we played Mett?
And yes he's a savior to me or any of the other QBs, if they can just be an average to slightly above-average QB in the SEC.
I would just like to see someone new get a chance, doesn't have to Mett. I would even be okay with one of the other 2 new guys getting a chance but Mett clearly has more experience than those 2.
re: Regarding expectations for Mett
Posted by doogles02 on 4/19/11 at 9:34 pm
quote:
Peach Bowl?
Yeah Peach Bowl, Cap1 was Saban's last year here and Flynn was a freshman and did not receive playing time.
re: My Aggie Roommate Says A&M is stealing Denzell Devall
Posted by doogles02 on 4/19/11 at 9:10 pm
I stand corrected, but you did reply with smart arse rankings
Popular
25
