Favorite team:LSU 
Location:The Stick
Biography:Res ipsa loquitor
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:6266
Registered on:2/1/2005
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
The Epstein situation gets down to 1 question: What happened to #LockHerUp?
quote:

Ethan Frey – Says Frey in same situation as Jones. Says he can come back to play a position because you just don’t see a full time DH get drafted.


What’s with the idea that Frey is only a DH? Has he only DHed in summers and HS, too? If a pro team is willing to draft a HS position player, wouldn’t the same team be willing to draft an ultra athletic prospect who they saw play in the field in HS, and they’ve seen refined improvement at the plate vs SEC pitching?

I don’t really see much comparison Frey to Jones insofar as the DH only analysis
It was a systematic, step by step approach to destroying America between HW to Tim Osman/Osama/Obama and it was Shrillary’s turn next.

Then, from out of nowhere a real estate mogul & reality tv star descended down that golden escalator.
quote:

This guy is full blown America hating communist nut job. Pure filth. Way to go NYC.


They’re just following the country’s lead for 12 out of the last 16 years
It’s really just different philosophies. Marinara liked a bunch of little, skinny fast twitch types. Jay brought back the gorillas for gorilla ball.

re: The game was called well.

Posted by TheFranchise on 6/22/25 at 10:16 am
The Dickinson play was absolutely not correct. The umpire has to find intent. No one ever would try to get by Ball Four. No intent, no intentional HBP.

I guess you thought Patrick Peterson was out of bounds, didn’t you?

I don’t know where they find these replay officials.
There are legitimate reasons for a coach or player to take the first pitch or take until you get a strike. Harder to know if it’s a call, strategy or happenstance without being at the game and on the field
That moron replay official can go pay his bookie because we won anyways!!!

re: Guess no Ben tonight

Posted by TheFranchise on 6/14/25 at 3:11 pm
Peterson will be sucking Arky off all night. Shame.

re: Guess no Ben tonight

Posted by TheFranchise on 6/14/25 at 2:02 pm
quote:

Monaco, Peterson, Burke, Budden


Aww not Peterson. Would rather Perez than Peterson.
quote:

And Blue Cross paid a contracted rate


Udtiger and other pro-tort reform folks do not want lower premiums .

Why should the premiums I pay to BCBS benefit the tortfeasor or Progressive?

The bill basically shifts the burden of medicals onto the health insurer, creating further inefficiencies within the macro insurance market.

The summer of covid tort reform package and last year’s tort reform package have exhibited ZERO impact to auto insurance premiums. This one won’t either.

The auto insurance industry doesn’t care about claims costs. If they did, they wouldn’t waste so much defending clear cut cases.

Our insurance commissioner allows them to charge so much higher premiums that their profit margins are higher here than in most states.

We have more wrecks here per capita than most places. Our terrible roads and lack of any real traffic enforcement drive up the wrecks. You want meaningful change that may actually affect auto premiums? Start with legislation geared towards lowering the number of wrecks.
BR has tons of Mexican restaurants almost all owned by Middle Easterners
Imagine having such a minimal IQ that you fall victim/dupe to the insurance lobby in the face of countervailing objective, empirical evidence
quote:

Temple is working hard on tort reform.


Temple is working hard on tort reform that benefits the insurance companies, rather than Louisianans. As long as insurers are allowed to get away with having a 200% higher profit margin in this State relative to its neighbors, nothing will fix the insurance crisis.

If tort reform works to correct premiums, why didn’t you see premium decreases after the sweeping tort reforms of 2020 and 2024? Because tort reform only works to restrict the rights of the injured; it does ZERO to affect premiums.

At the same time, streamlining the courts to reduce the dollar & time investment necessary to prosecute/defend personal injury claims would reduce the real inefficiencies in the market which are centered around incentivizing protracted and deleterious litigation practices rather than paying fair amounts for valid claims.
The fact is - there’s plenty of blame to go around. But one-sided “tort reform” has been established to have not worked to reduce rates in medmal, premises liability, 2020 tort reform and 2024 tort reform. And I’ve never seen any evidence that one-sided tort reform has ever reduced rates in any other state.

You can’t be serious about really addressing rates without having real solutions that are actually designed to work rather than simply demonize one side or the other.

There are real solutions that would work without depriving really injured folks of the chance to recover for the often life long impacts of significant injury. They don’t score political points but they would actually reduce rates.

As long as cops and DAs are “too busy” for auto theft, auto burglary, and enforcing auto safety laws and DOTD/CityParish Public Works are “too busy” to correct some of the dangerous roadways, we’ll continue having higher per capita vehicle theft and higher per capita MVAs than 48 or so other states.

Go drive around the “other side of the tracks” streets in your city/town, you’ll see the lanes are much narrower.

It’s not the lawyers, it’s only partly the insurance companies’ greed, but there are real common sense solutions that would actually impact rates in a positive manner.

This is actually a slight misstatement. First, you have to account for the fact that health coverage provider wants their money back. And it needs to get it back. The liability coverage of these maniacs riding peoples’ tails, etc should have to address the necessary hospital bills, not the health coverage providers. To make Medicaid, Medicare or private health insurance eat that cost would create significant economic inefficiencies in the health insurance market.

Here’s a better solution to manage the healthcare costs involved in these PI cases:

Do you realize that Acadian Ambulance and most hospitals will refuse to accept health insurance when the patient was injured in a wreck or a fall? That’s right, they expect some sort of windfall if the patient was injured by someone else vs. a heart attack or stroke or some other health related factor. Allowing this to continue literally incentivizes the transportation or treatment of MVA patients over regular folks needing emergent care. BR General is among the worst at this practice. Then you have these private urgent care facilities that refuse health coverage but charge $30,000 plus for the same ER treatment that would normally run about $5000 for which Medicare or private HI would pay about $1500.

When you really get down to the nuts and bolts and actually study the economic inefficiencies, real effective change could be made but it’s not as politically expedient as blaming the plaintiff lawyers or the billion dollar insurance companies.
quote:

Are there?


Ever driven between Vidor and Houston? Bay St Louis to Panama City or points east? Pascagoula to Atlanta?
McComb to Atlanta through Tuscaloosa/Birmingham?
quote:

Again, same insurance companies in the considerably cheaper to insure states. What's the difference?


Same number of billboard lawyers in the considerably cheaper to insure states. What’s the real difference?
quote:

That is false


No, it’s absolutely true.

quote:

Are rates are high due to the litigious nature of our trashy population in this state and the bullshite laws that favor the plaintiff.


This is false

quote:

Not to mention the absurd number of people who don’t want to pay for additional insurance then sues the insurance company for not paying out on the policy they don’t have. If you don’t pay for coverage, you are not entitled to the benefits of the coverage you don’t have!!!


Not even sure what this is supposed to mean. You can’t sue your own insurer for not paying out on coverage you don’t have. Even so, that would be contract law, not tort law.

Look, the legislature passed rather sweeping tort reform in 2020 and 2024. Have your rates come down since then? No? That’s because “tort reform” is not the problem and, thus, not the solution. We have among the lowest quantum of injury damages in the country.

We have horrible roads & infrastructure which leads to an increased volume of wrecks. We have an obscenely high rate of uninsured/underinsured drivers. We have grossly dangerous drivers but the cops don’t do anything about it. We have parish-wide judges elected by a small sliver of folks within a district. We have severe bag logs in the courts due to Covid, a lack of resources, laziness and incompetence. Overly aggressive insurance companies who run up huge bills with their own lawyers because they want to fight even the most clear cut cases and the most reasonable claims. Out of state Insurance adjusters who are paid commissions and bonuses on how well they screw people do nothing but push more victims to attorneys and push more claims into litigation. We have laws against frivolous claims by plaintiffs and defendants, but they’re rarely enforced making them virtually toothless.