Favorite team:Alabama 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:146
Registered on:12/13/2009
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
this board is filled with disgusting people like the OP who celebrate people getting killed. I hope the OP is 12 years old and thus can be excused for this despicable behavior.

The fact that this board tolerates it...

re: New shooting in Minnesota

Posted by Thirteen on 1/24/26 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

Two of them have their guns out at that point.


do you mean the grey jacket guy with the protestor's gun? or someone else
no it's the guy in olive who starts the shooting, clear as day unholstered

see this video

nsfw

LINK

re: New shooting in Minnesota

Posted by Thirteen on 1/24/26 at 5:05 pm to
you need to watch this video. looks to me like started by a single agent and in the video no explanation why can be seen, imo

nsfw

LINK

re: New shooting in Minnesota

Posted by Thirteen on 1/24/26 at 4:53 pm to
stabliized and slowed down nsfw video in link
yes her reckless behavior was a risk to someone nearby getting hurt
what logical fallacy is that? I think it's the strawman logical fallacy. You arguing against something I didn't say because that's the only way you can make a point.

cheers!
I think most people using reason and good faith can drawing a line for all the different situations.

For example, can we agree not ok to kill someone if they are threatening to break my pinky?

Is ok to kill someone to stop them from raping me?

Is it ok to kill someone for not providing a drivers license? Is it ok to kill someone passed out driving in a moving car? Is it ok to kill someone fleeing an arrest? It is ok to kill someone fleeing an arrest and whether or not i shoot them will make no difference to my own safety?
Yes, I think when the car started moving and he was in front of it he had reason to believe he was facing serious injury.

I know the next question, and, it's why I brought up the point of a passed out driver. If a car with a passed out driver is in close quarters heading towards a cop, is he right to shoot to kill the passed out driver?
did the shooting save his life or did him getting out of the way save his life?

honestly, in your opinion, what good did the shooting do to protect himself? If he had not shot her you think he would have been hit?
thank you for your attention to this matter!
I assumed you were not so stupid that you could gues it is implied that is the case for saving the life of another.

My guess is, you are take these opportunities to make stupid points because you can never actually make a good argument and this worthless contribution is the best you can do.

thank you!
yes it's justified for rape.
"and whether or not the officer had reason to believe she was trying to kill"

that addresses your point. if someone is pointing a gun at me i very well may have reason to believe they are trying to kill me whether or not that is their intent.

I wrote at the least he made a mistake. Would need more information to draw any more of a conclusion. To me most probable thing that happened is he freaked out in a scary situation and made a regrettable mistake.

I would like there to be some consequences for his mistake such that in the future it's known if you make this mistake there will be consequences.

I'm a big supporter of protesting in general, it's good for society. But it's got to be peaceful. I've seen lots of video of very dumb protesting and I think it's wrong for the protestors to provoke law enforcement. I wish they would get trained up in protesting like people in the MLK era. But they aren't and it sucks.
You are like a pharisee. I'm not talking about legality. Legality is like lowest bar of ethics/morality. I support the legal system, it's useful, we need it, but, it's only the arbiter of right and wrong for pharisees and idiots.
Most reasonable people would agree that you can only kill someone in self defense. You can only kill in self defense when there is no other reasonable option to save your self.

If there is a person passed out in a car and the car is heading toward a police officer it would be wrong for the officer to shoot the person.

On the other hand, if there is a bad/crooked cop, and that cop is trying to kill an innocent person by running them over, it's ok for the innocent person to shoot the bad cop if there is no other option.

It's the same rule for cop or citizen, you can't kill someone unless it's the only way to save yourself.

We can all agree cops can't kill someone for jay walking, cops can't kill someone for drug dealing, cops can't kill someone for punching the cop.

Whether or not the woman in Minnesota was trying to kill the officer, and whether or not the officer had reason to believe she was trying to kill him is very important. If she was being reckless, that's not a justification to kill her. The only justification is whether that's the only way he could save himself.

At the very least the officer made a mistake. Shooting her in no way saved his life. Jumping out of the way saved his life.

I don't understand how anyone can watch that video, hear the lady, see her turn the wheel to the right, and then conclude it was her goal to kill him. Was she reckless? Yes for sure.


No, Democrats do not care more about non US citizens than actual US citizens. And if you believe they do, it indicates you have been suckered by propaganda.

re: Is Trump gaining momentum?

Posted by Thirteen on 12/24/25 at 3:52 pm to
data point for your consideration:

US Real GPD growth from:

Q4 2023 to Q3 2024 = 1.93%

Q4 2024 to Q3 2025 = 1.86%

Source, St Louis FED LINK

re: DJT statement on Rob Reiner.

Posted by Thirteen on 12/15/25 at 3:18 pm to
can't believe the guy who said "grab 'em by the pussy" also made this post