Favorite team:LSU 
Location:BR
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1160
Registered on:12/2/2009
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

However, the concept of the show, choreography, the set and originality of the show was excellent. I'll give him credit for that


Mellencamp's politics are a bit extreme, but I'll agree with this.

Was one of the more entertaining halftime shows I've seen. Made me want to light up a cigar and watch The Rum Diary.
quote:

More like shrinking it to a third of the playable area, i.e., holes 2 and 3.


Replacing a full 9 holes with pitch-and-putt is like replacing a tennis court with pickleball, or a baseball field with a wiffleball field, and telling players it's the same sport because they can still swing a racket or a bat.

re: Hot Springs , Arkansas courses

Posted by 904 on 2/7/26 at 6:39 pm to
If you're playing in Hot Springs Village, you can't go wrong with any of the courses, but bring a crappy 7 iron and SW to hit out of the bunkers and hardpan with. Pebbles in the bunkers and hidden rocks roughed up my clubs pretty good. Otherwise, was some great golf.
quote:

Did I hear right at the end he said he was threatening to shoot them?

The end of the 4th video has him walking up to the car trying to reason with him. I don't know if he ever threatened to shoot, but the drunk dude started getting aggressive.

https://www.tiktok.com/@wilderthanmost32/video/7602350224895413535?is_from_webapp=1&web_id=7550735315054528014
quote:

Thank you. I am on a five hour ride to TX tomorrow. I’ll shoot some emails out to them, the metro council, and maybe the local state rep.


Back in October, I made my voice heard and sent an email advocating for keeping the current course footprint during the voting session. Commissioner Polito, who from the start has been pushing for heavy BRAF involvement and a full revamp replied back, proclaimed innocence and asked where I saw that the proposal would involve doing anything to the golf course. I then called out what was obvious among other things, that certain individuals and organizations have wanted to remove or substantially shrink the course for decades now, and letting BRAF solely lead the effort could open the door to excluding any meaningful input from the golfers in the community of which there are many. A different commissioner who voted no to BRAF replied, thanking me for my input.

I'm curious what they reply to you this time.
Most drivers can be made lighter than the new Callaway Quantum if need be by just removing any adjustable weight in the back of the head... and anyone claiming 10-15+ yards has almost surely found a driver and shaft combo that simply fits them better than their old setup.

I'd be willing to bet that, next year, Callaway will come out with a driver head that is marketed as heavier to increase mass which will supposedly translate more force into the ball and improve forgiveness across the face.

quote:

There's a USGA limit to this and every driver released in recent history is at that limit.

To back this up, I bought a Ping G30 back in 2014 that I've been trying to get rid of for the past 5 years now. I'll go to Edwin Watts each year and test it against the new drivers, and the G30 still has similar (or even better in some cases) numbers with a tighter dispersion than the newest models. The simulator says I'm in the 165 range for ball speed no matter which driver I hit, including the G30, which should be plenty to see technology improvements.

There's a case to be made that the face has been broken in making it slightly more springy and that I've become accustomed to the shaft, but I'm not dropping $600 on a driver until I find one that outperforms it.
quote:

Then don't. We got here because you were saying your engineering degree offered 60-80K pay. I was just trying to offer a solution. One you don't seem to want. Fine with me.

I never asked for a solution for me, personally, I'm a new-ish homeowner who's generally content with my situation at this point, even if it took longer than I had hoped.

I responded to your "get a technical degree, don't be lazy" advice with my own personal anecdote to show that it's not that straightforward for young workers, even technical ones, especially with how much salaries have lagged vs housing and other costs.
quote:

Take a look anyway. The worst that can happen is they say no.

I don't know how we got here, but I'm content with my life at the moment, and it wouldn't be worth it for us to move away from grandparents/family to Huntsville of all places to start a 3rd career at the bottom of the food chain again, especially with kids in the near/immediate future.
quote:

What kind of engineering degree?

Petroleum, hence the drilling rigs.

As I learned later, universities almost always oversell how much you make out of school and what you'll be doing. Also, that degree doesn't isn't easy to transition into other engineering positions or industries, such as a mechanical or something, but I could've done far, far worse as an 18-22 year old. Still glad I have the degree.
quote:

That's not reality. If you get a technical degree, you'll get a good job. My advice would be don't get a shite degree. Or don't a degree at all and become HVAC, Electrician, Plumber. Get some experience, then open your own business.


I'm mid-30s, graduated with an engineering degree, worked my arse off as a field engineer on drilling rigs for 5 years. Saved money despite only making about $50-$60k per year at the time, but they lowered my pay as work dried up in the mid-late 2010's because of geopolitics out of my control and low crude prices. This then ate into my savings, so I moved in with my grandparents, taught myself how to code with a $13 online bootcamp, and just made 6 years at my company working as a developer.

I've never come close to making $130k, or six-figures for that matter and I certainly don't have a shite degree. I know some, but not all, of my engineering friends make more than that. In fact, my now-wife and I barely make that today combined with her in healthcare. Finally bought a meager 1200 sq/ft house in a safe area a couple years ago, and I have a good, stable, technical job with great benefits/work life balance and kind coworkers so no regrets, but it sure wasn't easy and wasn't a realistic possibility for me anytime in my 20s without going to unreasonably lengths like moving into an unsafe area or a very remote location, which I deemed wasn't worth it. Probably would still be a single guy too if I decided to move somewhere super remote.


So all that to say, it's never that simple.
quote:

If you're making 130K, you can have total payments of 40% of 130K. That is 52K a year, which is $4300 a month. Be modest on your cars, 1 beater and a decent used car ($600 a month). Pay credit cards off. Say you have $1000 in student loans. You're left with $2700 for a mortgage. Payment on a 450K mortgage (nothing down) would be 2550. Assuming you have to pay pmi, you could likely get into a 375-400K mortgage easy enough.

You've missed the point entirely.


We're X years in the future and the 90th percentile highest-earning 30 year olds are still only making $130k, but the cheapest starter home/shack/tent available in the entire country to either build or buy now costs $1.2 million. It's also now illegal to cut down trees to construct your own log cabin.

Would your advice to 30 year olds everywhere still be, "It's all up to you, work longer, smarter, and harder and then you might be able to buy a home like I did"? Or there's something very wrong here?

If the first one, how expensive would that cheapest home in the country have to be for you to put the onus on the decision makers to fix?
quote:

quote:
Hypothetically, what would the average cost of a 2 bed 1 bath starter home have to get to for your average worker "doing everything right" to not be able to afford a house until they are in their 40s and infertile?

Depend on location. I bet you could move to smaller location, make less money, commute 50 miles to work find a small home and have more disposable income.cThing is you don't want to hear anything other than you are a victim. You're not.



Say that income completely stagnates (instead of just slows as it is currently) for whatever reason and the 90th percentile and highest earners of 30 year olds "doing everything right" are making $130,000/year.

How much would the cheapest available and very meager 2 bed 1 bath starter house in the country have to cost for you to not put the onus on the individual to work longer hours and harder to make more money if they want a chance at home ownership?

$150,000?
$300,000?
$700,000?
$10,000,000?


I'm trying to figure out if the situation could ever get to a point where you would admit that there's a problem with potential policies and not the individual.


quote:

If they can't afford a home, they are not doing most everything right now are they.

Hypothetically, what would the average cost of a 2 bed 1 bath starter home have to get to for your average worker "doing everything right" to not be able to afford a house until they are in their 40s and infertile?

I mean, at some point math has to take over and there's no more hours to work or determination to put forth and housing prices are such that houses are only for those who already have one or multiple, or who's parents have equity in a house and money, right?
quote:

Always gotta knock the accomplishments of others. When if you said, "That guy can do it, so can I".

:lol:

"Congratulations. You found a niche or some extra leverage or whatever. That's great, and I mean that sincerely. I'm also in software and I'm trying to get there someday."
... is clearly not knocking your accomplishments. "You found [through hard work and almost surely some luck as well] a niche or some extra leverage or whatever." I literally said I'm trying to get there someday.


The point is, again, this isn't about specifically you or I. It's a conversation about the average young professional who's doing most everything right. That's who Trump needs to be empowering if he cares about the future of this country.


quote:

I'm not management. I'm a worker. Call me a "Computer Network Engineer". I make 165K more than median.

Congratulations. You found a niche or some extra leverage or whatever. That's great, and I mean that sincerely. I'm also in software and I'm trying to get there someday.


But the point is, this isn't about specifically you. This is about your average, hard-working, law-abiding young professional who is having to rent until their 30s and hold off on starting a family because, outside of taking a 2nd job and working a legitimately unhealthy and unreasonable amount of hours, they can't afford a starter home because median wages haven't kept up. That's the problem that needs solving, because its the worst median income to housing cost ratio in the last several decades. And intentionally raising housing prices is only going to make it worse.

Just to reiterate, it's about empowering the median worker of their age group who's doing most everything right, also known as your current and future middle class which is what this country was built on.

quote:

That's how the real world works. Prices go up (inflate) as the years go by. EVERYTHING gets more expensive.

Everything gets more expensive, but median/average salaries should increase at the same rate as well. They haven't, and it's not even close.

quote:

It is up to the individual to increase their value so that their pay goes up as well. If the individual refuses to do that frickem.

Not everyone can be a CEO or upper management. The world needs people to actually perform the work, and those people will always get paid closer to median incomes.

This thinking is too granular. Zoom out.
quote:

Go check out what the average house looked like in the 80's vs. today. Young people today WILL NOT live in these houses. They don't want starter homes that actually look like starter homes. They want the homes their parents moved up to over decades. Even college students turn their noses up at the crappy apartments we lived in.


This is sometimes true depending on the person, but usually any house that looks like it's from the 80's also means that the expensive stuff you can't see probably hasn't been updated either. My wife and I live in a partially updated 1200sqft 2 bed 1 bath starter home that was built in the 40s. We love the house, but are also about to spend thousands on a sewage job because we found out that tree roots have broken our main line made out of terracotta. That doesn't include the stuff we've already fixed ourselves or still need to fix like the deteriorated ductwork, old electrical wiring, insulation, etc.

I don't think it's unreasonable that young people looking to start families soon want access to reasonably-priced starter homes built/renovated for the standards of the last 20 years or so in hopes that they don't have to spend money that they don't have early in their careers fixing/updating lots of things... and I also think that applies to every generation before this one as well, including yours.
quote:

I work with young ins that bring in a crap-a-chino from starbucks every day ( and they likely buy them on the weekend). 300 days of $8 coffees and $20 lunches is $8400.


There's no way. I work in a young office in tech/marketing with ~30 people where the average age is about 28 and no-one older than 40s, and I might see 2-3 starbucks cups a day at most. Overwhelming majority use the coffee machine, bring in lunches to put in the fridge, or head home for lunch. I know because I help manage the coffee supply and maintenance of the machine. Nicest car in the lot belongs to the owner, which is a $45k car that's a few years old, and most of the rest are cheaper makes and/or older cars.

I'm in my early 30s and also one of only a handful that own a home and aren't renting.

re: Tfcc injury in trail hand

Posted by 904 on 1/29/26 at 8:23 pm to
No popping or clicking, but most of the rest. Thanks for the info :cheers: