Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:86
Registered on:11/22/2009
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Agreed! While Kirk has his place in the thrash scene he is massively overrated by most casual fans. Learn to play his solos and it’s mostly the same pentatonic double stop licks saturated in wah. He does have a few melodic solos but those are much more rare.
He’s one of the fathers of thrash with legendary downpicking endurance. Those first few albums are legendary and really helped define and lay the groundwork of what was to come in metal.
You must not have heard the things he said on whiskey and wine after the loss to auburn.

re: Joe Brady new HC?

Posted by brooksbabino on 10/4/21 at 2:31 pm
He doesn’t want to deal with recruiting and the flakiness of 16 year olds with inflated egos.
It’s patently false that the vaccine itself is causing hospitalizations. Maybe I should have articulated a bit more. Correlation is not causation.
We live in the same home town and know someone in his family. For the sake of keeping the player’s personal and family information out of the thread that bit of information was omitted. He was in town and the timing lined up. Nothing more nothing less. Nobody was paid money or anything crazy like that. Just a player trying to make a kid’s day. Some of you need to relax.
Little brother A&M and it isn’t even close!
quote:

LSU fans will inevitably overestimate their team's capabilities. Bama fans on the other hand, are likely to underestimate the team. You would think that after 8 long years of Tiger braggadocio, only to walk away with a crimson cleat planted firmly up their arse, they would temper the enthusiasm just a tad. But noooo, not LSU fans! It's full speed ahead into yet another painful rendezvous with destiny. Sure, the nightmare will end some day....but not tomorrow.





It's definitely just Les speak. If you've listened to any of his podcasts since he was replaced as HC then you would know he still holds LSU in high esteem and that the tigers are still near and dear to his heart. We are over analyzing this for sure.
I didn't realize you are the arbiter of defining what qualifies as a discussion. I'm not setting up a two column deductive proof in debate format here, nor is OP. I'm simply stating that the evidence is anecdotal at best and that such a large and complex claim should require ample evidence to back it up. I am repeating it because you aren't accepting what I am telling you. Instead you are bogged down in minutia and presuming to know my thoughts and intentions when I am telling you the crux of my problem with the thread.
I'm only having a discussion. Let us boil this down to the basics. There is a claim. The claim is insinuating that the Clintons are tied to at least 56 deaths with the motive being money, power, self preservation, whatever. That's quite a claim. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence to support the claim in question. So far the only evidence being offered is a 1990s chain mail which is anecdotal at best. All nit picking and ball busting aside - It is not up to ME to go down and scratch names off the list rather the burden is on the person making the claim to show why all the names on the list support the claim. It seems someone else has already scratched a few off the list so you may want to direct your attention to them.
The burden of proof is not on me. I'm not the one making the claim. There is, so far, a claim and a 1990s chain mail as evidence for said claim.
That's not the premise. I'm not naive to the fact that people are killed for money or power. I just don't grant the premise that this ridiculous chain mail conspiracy theory from last millennia holds any water.
Refuting the premise of an argument invalidates all the BS that is to follow. I guess you missed that lecture. And no, it wasn't an ad hominem attack. An ad hom fallacy would be trying to refute your argument through personal insult. I made a point FIRST, pointing out that it is all based off of a 1990s conspiracy theory chain mail that is still being sent around to everyone's crazy uncle to add names to, THEN I insulted you. There's a distinct difference. But hey you will be rich soon so what does it matter? There's a sweet chain letter out there with your name on it from a Nigerian Prince. Says you're owed millions.
Says the person keeping a 1990s chain mail conspiracy theory alive. Go back to your flat Earth forum.