hybrid3

Just make the division games count for getting to the SEC title game. Then it doesn't matter how easy bama and Georgia have it.

Of course USC and LSU voted for this last year in Destin, but it didn't pass.

Who was leading the charge NOT to institute this change that is fair and makes common sense?

yup - bama

They get what they want. At least for now.

quote:

---

Why won't LSU embrace the rivalry with Florida?

---

1. Not a real rivlary
2. The loser is usually out of the SEC race.
3. MOSTLY because the pukes in the SEC office make it as easy for bama as possible by making these two teams play each other every year.

Ole Miss will be at best 2 - 4 when LSU rolls into Oxford.

LSU will have MUCH more to play for in this game.

Tough, but comfortable win for the Tigers against a dejectet team on the slide.

quote:

---

AND, if accepting the fact that "permanent" opponents will stay, then why not have just your divisional games count toward going to the SEC title game?

USC and LSU voted for this measure in Destin during the past conference meetings. bama voted against that measure.

Gee, could it be because they know they have the easiest road? Pussies.

---

If anyone from bamaland disagrees with the "myth", the above says it all. Not counting the huge edge provided by the officials.

If the SEC and Mark Womack had any integrity on the 2013 schedule, they would have flipped bama and LSU games against KY and GA.

THAT would have been fine.

Maybe we need an Auburn grad working on this?

The 2012 and 2013 schedules were part of Mark Womack's responsibility. Tuscaloosa native, bama grad, worked in bama's athletic department.

NO CHANCE of bias there.
:lol:

And regarding the UT rivalry "must", the OU - Nebraska game was and is far more relevant than UT and bama. Give that a rest.

AND, if accepting the fact that "permanent" opponents will stay, then why not have just your divisional games count toward going to the SEC title game?

USC and LSU voted for this measure in Destin during the past conference meetings. bama voted against that measure.

Gee, could it be because they know they have the easiest road? Pussies.

quote:

---

This isn't an LSU site. Alabama was called for holding in the game btw. The o line played great though, big part of why Bama pulled off the win.

---

One time. In the first quarter - and it wasn't a hold, it was a tackle.

bama won and LSU had too many chances to seal the deal and didn't. NO execuses for LSU not putting it away. And bama made the plays at the end to win.

Simple to understand.

But any bama fan has their head on backwards if they don't know bama gets away with murder on the line.

FACT from stats on bama's football website:

In the last six SEC games of 2009, including the SEC title game against the gators, bama had NO holding penalties. Go figure?

This year, one against Mizzou and LSU. Both in the first qtr.

Oh well.

quote:

---

Does Bama Win Without AJ?

---

Did he miss the bus?

In that case, is his mom bringing him?

wins?

Don't see either D giving up more than that without deep turnover or ST play.

Hoping it is not a snoozer like 12 to 7 and a lot of punts.

Fans have the want and deserve more.

quote:

---

Do you own a farm?

---

About 210 Ponderosa acres.

Knob Creek and an evening view. Only thing better is being in Tiger Stadium on a pleasant Saturday night.