tigertracts
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 471 |
| Registered on: | 11/22/2009 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
Dawn Staley is the best active WBB coach—hands down…
Posted by tigertracts on 2/16/26 at 7:04 am
CKM is more than solid and we will likely make the sweet 16.
32
Anybody else concerned we’re not blowing out a division II type program such as Milwaukee?
Posted by tigertracts on 2/15/26 at 2:22 pm
(No Message)
Giving up 5 runs to Milwaukee??
Posted by tigertracts on 2/13/26 at 8:01 pm
Anybody concerned? I’m really not.
:popcorn:
:popcorn:
re: Will Campbell getting manhandled hurts to watch
Posted by tigertracts on 2/8/26 at 8:39 pm to Cd104
Was shocked he went so high in the draft. Good kid. Overrated.
Over/Under on Lane going for it in 4th down inside his own 40 yard line in 2026—7
Posted by tigertracts on 2/2/26 at 7:39 pm
I’ll say PUSH
Having Lane offsets the trauma of men’s BB.
Posted by tigertracts on 1/24/26 at 7:05 pm
(No Message)
Dude can’t close out a game.
Posted by tigertracts on 1/24/26 at 7:02 pm
Choke artist.
Simulated Game between 2019 LSU Tigers and 2025 Indiana Hoosiers (Claude AI)
Posted by tigertracts on 1/20/26 at 6:25 am
Projected Final Score: LSU 38, Indiana 31
Here’s my reasoning:
Why LSU would win:
1. Unmatched offensive firepower - That 2019 LSU offense is considered one of the greatest in college football history. Burrow’s 60 TDs broke records, and they had TWO future NFL Pro Bowl 1,500-yard receivers.
2. Elite competition tested - LSU beat SEVEN top-10 teams, including five top-5 teams by an average margin of 20 points. They faced defenses much better than what Indiana saw in 2025.
3. Playoff experience edge - In the actual playoffs, Burrow threw for 956 yards and 12 TDs in two games (63-28 vs Oklahoma, 42-25 vs Clemson).
4. Explosive plays - LSU averaged 7.89 yards per play with multiple 50+ and 60+ point performances.
Why Indiana would keep it close:
1. Defensive dominance - That 10.3 PPG allowed is elite. They’d create turnovers and force LSU into longer drives.
2. Mendoza’s efficiency - While his volume stats are lower, his decision-making (6 INTs in 16 games) would prevent catastrophic mistakes.
3. Complete team - Indiana went 16-0 for a reason - balanced, well-coached, clutch in big moments.
4. Modern scheme advantages - Six years of defensive evolution could slow LSU’s passing attack somewhat.
The Game Flow:
* LSU would jump out to an early lead (17-7 at halftime) with big plays to Chase and Jefferson
* Indiana would methodically grind back in the third quarter, using Mendoza’s mobility and smart play-calling (24-21 LSU after three)
* Fourth quarter shootout with both QBs making Heisman-worthy plays
* LSU’s superior weapons would make the difference in crunch time - a late Burrow-to-Jefferson touchdown connection seals it
* That 2019 LSU team is simply regarded by many as the greatest college football team of the modern era. While Indiana’s 2025 squad was magnificent in their own right, LSU’s offensive juggernaut combined with facing tougher competition gives them the edge in this dream matchup.
Here’s my reasoning:
Why LSU would win:
1. Unmatched offensive firepower - That 2019 LSU offense is considered one of the greatest in college football history. Burrow’s 60 TDs broke records, and they had TWO future NFL Pro Bowl 1,500-yard receivers.
2. Elite competition tested - LSU beat SEVEN top-10 teams, including five top-5 teams by an average margin of 20 points. They faced defenses much better than what Indiana saw in 2025.
3. Playoff experience edge - In the actual playoffs, Burrow threw for 956 yards and 12 TDs in two games (63-28 vs Oklahoma, 42-25 vs Clemson).
4. Explosive plays - LSU averaged 7.89 yards per play with multiple 50+ and 60+ point performances.
Why Indiana would keep it close:
1. Defensive dominance - That 10.3 PPG allowed is elite. They’d create turnovers and force LSU into longer drives.
2. Mendoza’s efficiency - While his volume stats are lower, his decision-making (6 INTs in 16 games) would prevent catastrophic mistakes.
3. Complete team - Indiana went 16-0 for a reason - balanced, well-coached, clutch in big moments.
4. Modern scheme advantages - Six years of defensive evolution could slow LSU’s passing attack somewhat.
The Game Flow:
* LSU would jump out to an early lead (17-7 at halftime) with big plays to Chase and Jefferson
* Indiana would methodically grind back in the third quarter, using Mendoza’s mobility and smart play-calling (24-21 LSU after three)
* Fourth quarter shootout with both QBs making Heisman-worthy plays
* LSU’s superior weapons would make the difference in crunch time - a late Burrow-to-Jefferson touchdown connection seals it
* That 2019 LSU team is simply regarded by many as the greatest college football team of the modern era. While Indiana’s 2025 squad was magnificent in their own right, LSU’s offensive juggernaut combined with facing tougher competition gives them the edge in this dream matchup.
Simulated Game between 2019 LSU Tigers and 2025 Indiana Hoosiers (Claude AI)
Posted by tigertracts on 1/20/26 at 6:21 am
Projected Final Score: LSU 38, Indiana 31
Here’s my reasoning:
Why LSU would win:
1. Unmatched offensive firepower - That 2019 LSU offense is considered one of the greatest in college football history. Burrow’s 60 TDs broke records, and they had TWO future NFL Pro Bowl 1,500-yard receivers.
2. Elite competition tested - LSU beat SEVEN top-10 teams, including five top-5 teams by an average margin of 20 points. They faced defenses much better than what Indiana saw in 2025.
3. Playoff experience edge - In the actual playoffs, Burrow threw for 956 yards and 12 TDs in two games (63-28 vs Oklahoma, 42-25 vs Clemson).
4. Explosive plays - LSU averaged 7.89 yards per play with multiple 50+ and 60+ point performances.
Why Indiana would keep it close:
1. Defensive dominance - That 10.3 PPG allowed is elite. They’d create turnovers and force LSU into longer drives.
2. Mendoza’s efficiency - While his volume stats are lower, his decision-making (6 INTs in 16 games) would prevent catastrophic mistakes.
3. Complete team - Indiana went 16-0 for a reason - balanced, well-coached, clutch in big moments.
4. Modern scheme advantages - Six years of defensive evolution could slow LSU’s passing attack somewhat.
The Game Flow:
* LSU would jump out to an early lead (17-7 at halftime) with big plays to Chase and Jefferson
* Indiana would methodically grind back in the third quarter, using Mendoza’s mobility and smart play-calling (24-21 LSU after three)
* Fourth quarter shootout with both QBs making Heisman-worthy plays
* LSU’s superior weapons would make the difference in crunch time - a late Burrow-to-Jefferson touchdown connection seals it
* That 2019 LSU team is simply regarded by many as the greatest college football team of the modern era. While Indiana’s 2025 squad was magnificent in their own right, LSU’s offensive juggernaut combined with facing tougher competition gives them the edge in this dream matchup.
Here’s my reasoning:
Why LSU would win:
1. Unmatched offensive firepower - That 2019 LSU offense is considered one of the greatest in college football history. Burrow’s 60 TDs broke records, and they had TWO future NFL Pro Bowl 1,500-yard receivers.
2. Elite competition tested - LSU beat SEVEN top-10 teams, including five top-5 teams by an average margin of 20 points. They faced defenses much better than what Indiana saw in 2025.
3. Playoff experience edge - In the actual playoffs, Burrow threw for 956 yards and 12 TDs in two games (63-28 vs Oklahoma, 42-25 vs Clemson).
4. Explosive plays - LSU averaged 7.89 yards per play with multiple 50+ and 60+ point performances.
Why Indiana would keep it close:
1. Defensive dominance - That 10.3 PPG allowed is elite. They’d create turnovers and force LSU into longer drives.
2. Mendoza’s efficiency - While his volume stats are lower, his decision-making (6 INTs in 16 games) would prevent catastrophic mistakes.
3. Complete team - Indiana went 16-0 for a reason - balanced, well-coached, clutch in big moments.
4. Modern scheme advantages - Six years of defensive evolution could slow LSU’s passing attack somewhat.
The Game Flow:
* LSU would jump out to an early lead (17-7 at halftime) with big plays to Chase and Jefferson
* Indiana would methodically grind back in the third quarter, using Mendoza’s mobility and smart play-calling (24-21 LSU after three)
* Fourth quarter shootout with both QBs making Heisman-worthy plays
* LSU’s superior weapons would make the difference in crunch time - a late Burrow-to-Jefferson touchdown connection seals it
* That 2019 LSU team is simply regarded by many as the greatest college football team of the modern era. While Indiana’s 2025 squad was magnificent in their own right, LSU’s offensive juggernaut combined with facing tougher competition gives them the edge in this dream matchup.
re: Mendoza is no Burreaux.
Posted by tigertracts on 1/19/26 at 9:07 pm to LSUgrad88
Lol
re: Mendoza is no Burreaux.
Posted by tigertracts on 1/19/26 at 9:00 pm to LSUgrad88
Sissy sellout
Mendoza is no Burreaux.
Posted by tigertracts on 1/19/26 at 8:44 pm
(No Message)
re: Can someone explain the Rev Share money difference from big money donor??
Posted by tigertracts on 1/19/26 at 7:06 pm to TigerDavid3527
quote:
Rev Share
Isn’t he on staff at Healing Place?
Is this 2026 LSU Tiger Football team the most talent ever assembled?
Posted by tigertracts on 1/17/26 at 8:57 pm
I’ll hang up and listen.
:popcorn:
:popcorn:
McMan is a beast!!
Posted by tigertracts on 1/17/26 at 4:35 pm
Forever LSU.
Are we finished?
Posted by tigertracts on 1/17/26 at 4:08 pm
What’s next?
Ja’Mard Jones, the OT from Nicholls—anybody know anything about him?
Posted by tigertracts on 1/16/26 at 8:31 am
Seems like an odd portal acquisition.
We owe Brian Kelly big time…
Posted by tigertracts on 1/12/26 at 8:26 pm
If it were not for his utterly abysmal level of patheticness, we would not be enjoying this day of unprecedented joyfulness!!
We back baby!!!
We back baby!!!
Is Lane Kiffin the most beloved LSU HC in the last 60 years?
Posted by tigertracts on 1/12/26 at 8:21 pm
I’ll hang up and listen.
How does Leavitt compare to a healthy Nuss?
Posted by tigertracts on 1/12/26 at 5:22 pm
Other than mobility, I’d say similar.
I like Big Uglies and I cannot lie…
Posted by tigertracts on 1/12/26 at 9:35 am
Hopefully Lane can land a few more.
Popular
22
