Favorite team:LSU 
Location:NYC
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1136
Registered on:10/26/2009
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

A bigger retard to conclude they are immoral.


I didn’t say they were immoral: I said they were amoral. It wasn’t a typo :lol:

You don’t trade much in nuance, huh?
quote:

This show I know you have never taken economics. The uneducated will destroy this country through ignorance. fricking commies


You’ve really gone off the deep end, man. You’ve devolved from the quirky, slightly-out there guy who lives in the wilderness to full-blown loon with rage issues. You don’t know anything about my education level, and you certainly wouldn’t be able to glean it from a post about me laughing at the use of “crony capitalism.” I can tell you my profs certainly didn’t teach us that in business school, and they all had a hard-on for Friedman, and half of them were only moonlighting as teachers (their day jobs were a couple miles south, on Wall St), so it wasn’t because the b-school was some bastion of liberalism. These guys fricking loved capitalism, but they weren’t fricking stupid enough to believe it was fair. In fact, they loved it specifically because it wasn’t fair—it favored them.

They LOVE that idiots like you think free-market isn’t a joke, just like Google, FB, et al love it. They all keep profiting off your ignorance and your willingness to let them do their thing, and they’ve even gotten you to help them keep doing it! “No intervention because that’s bad.” They can’t believe their luck :lol:

I laid it out pretty simplistically in my last post. If you can’t follow that, then it’s probably not worth continuing. The takeaway, though, is that true free-market capitalism is a myth over time because it leads to consolidation of power and that leads to pay-for-play. We’re living in it now. You think politicians have the power to stop Google? :lol: you think people with the power of Google aren’t going to use that power to stay in power? :lol:

It’s over.




quote:

Where is this Free-Market Capitalism you speak of? The term you are looking for is Crony-Capitalism. That is what leads to all the negatives we see now.


Crony Capitalism isn't a real thing. it's a term used by people who don't want to admit that it's actually a symptom of late-stage free-market capitalism.

When the invisible hand (lol) guides the market, it guides toward consolidation (cream will rise). the successful will start to benefit from economies of scale, and this stacks the deck, and leads to further, compounded consolidation. and from consolidation comes immense power wielded buy a few select. these few select invariably will use their power/money to influence politicians (and anyone else). that's what money and power do: they give you influence.

thus, again, this is an inevitable end-game of capitalism, not some weird outlier. we've created a situation where a handful of very smart and very amoral people have all the money, and call all the shots. It's like the industrial revolution, but worse, because these guys also know everything about everyone.
quote:

But those who support this love power. We are headed toward a technocracy.


A technocracy is almost inevitable (I’d argue it’s already here). The irony is that a technocracy is the direct result of unchecked free-market capitalism. Capitalism inevitably leads to absolute power consolidation, and when that happens on a global scale, as it has over the past 20 years, it’s game over. The invisible hand isn’t going to save us—it led us right here :lol:
quote:

been given away with too many odd references to her by every character.


I agree they've been showing a lot of her for no specific reason, so she's probably involved somehow, but she seems like the type that would pay someone to do something like that, not do it. Who knows though.

I don't really care where this goes, honestly. The characters are interesting enough to keep me watching. I wish it was more than 6 eps
quote:

This is absurd. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about.


Maybe. I don’t claim to be an expert on everything, and I’m not a scientist/epidemiologist/virologist. Therefore, I should be nowhere near the table when policy decisions are being made around a pandemic.

But that kind of bolsters my argument. A lot of people in this thread are not experts and they’re shitting on the people who are. I actually don’t know the answer here, and I’m not here to shove my uninformed opinion on this down everyone’s throat. I’m here for discussion. Some people have tossed out some interesting thoughts, but none of them have really countered why the narrative here is that the scientists all screwed the pooch or that we’re in the midst of an NWO cabal-style takeover.
quote:

Here's the deal, stop letting doctors decide policy for 360 million people who are in various degrees of risk with blanket policy, and include "experts" in other fields that are affected by their ideas. You know, like economics, psychiatry, sociology, finance...


That’s not a bad idea in a vacuum, and there’s something to the argument that doctors (like climate scientists) are only looking at the issue through their own lens. But do you really want the money guys making the counter-argument when the stakes are literally extinction? We fricking lucked out that this wasn’t a bubonic plague or Spanish Flu because those happened in a pre-airplane world. Either of those comes today, and we’re fricking done. Quickly.

This isn’t an easy thing. I get the shutdowns are ruining economies and the social distancing guidelines are wreaking havoc on people’s psyche. Mine included. There’s a high cost associated with any move. But erring on the side of caution when you’re dealing with dozens of new and irregular variables (each with catastrophic potential) shouldn’t be considered wrong. We lucked out this time, and the scientists don’t have the benefit of hindsight.
quote:

It conditions people to do what the government tells them to do in the name of safety, and also doubles as a way to shame people who don't comply.


I actually think there’s something to this line of thinking (I think people in power probe the boundaries of what they can get away with), but I don’t think it’s binary (government mandate=secret nefarious scheme).

The scientists today are in such a shitty position, but they chose correctly. If they took the stance that we should let it ride, and COVID turned out to be Spanish Flu Part 2, we wipe out the whole fricking planet. And they would have been eaten alive. Instead, they erred (and continue to err) on the side of caution, and they’re pummeled in public by a bunch of amateur conspiracy theorists, claiming based on zero evidence that this is really just a global conspiracy to turn us all into slaves. The answer is probably in the middle (scientists want us to be safe, and some sinister politicians want to leverage that).

What do you think we should do? Nothing?
quote:

totalitarian/authoritarian agendas


So an authoritarian/totalitarian regime’s first splashy move is to...get the entire planet to cover their faces at pretty much all times (thereby making it harder to track said populace)?

re: I just cannot watch....

Posted by MI LSU on 11/7/20 at 8:33 pm
quote:

We've been trending towards Idiocracy for 15 years now.


We’re already past it. We elected Comacho four years ago :lol:
quote:

The most powerful position in the world. Even if he doesn't win, how the hell did we get to this point where a corrupted, lying, demented person is so close to be the leader of the free world?


You’re gonna flip when you find out who’s in office currently :lol:
quote:

to make you put absolute faith in a central government?


I don’t have absolute faith in the central government just like many right-wingers don’t have absolute faith in unchecked capitalism. This isn’t a binary; rather it’s a continuum.
quote:

bonefied civil war not seen since 1860...


the last one went so well for you guys! :lol:

re: Oct 15 debate canceled

Posted by MI LSU on 10/9/20 at 6:45 pm
quote:

RRRrrrrrriiiiiigggggghhhhhttttt.........Trump on his worst day with half his brain tied behind his back could defeat Biden. What kind of man doesn't like a strong dominant male leader....a wimp, perhaps??


The debate stage favors Biden. Both suck by themselves:

Trump’s coked-out stream-of-consciousness word salad plays well with his frothing base—who only hear the buzzwords—but does nothing for him (positively) for anyone else.

Biden’s relaxed and overly-rehearsed exhaustingly repetitive “classic” political soundbites don’t do much for him either.

But in a debate setting all Biden has to do is sit and wait for Trump to gleefully jump into the noose and hang himself. Over. And over. And over.

So if you’re being honest with yourself you all know this is Trump. He’s found himself in a position where he can’t bully or intimidate his opponent and he doesn’t know what to do.

ETA: the schadenfreude here is just delicious, btw. For months the loons have been swearing up and down that Biden and his camp were too pussy to debate and fricking trump cancels it. Just magic. :lol:
quote:

Coming from the same people that cry about states rights when Trump mentions using the National Guard to squash the unrest. The irony is too much sometimes.


I wasn't talking about force, you poor myopic bastards. I was talking about diplomacy :lol:

Trump is stuck in a narcissist's Catch 22: as president, he's in a unique position to quell the rage of those feeling disenfranchised--by, you know, speaking to them directly. Making them feel heard. And the people would love him for it. But he's also acutely aware that this would infuriate his base, which is comprised of xenophobes and cavemen, and if he loses them, he loses the vote. That's why he had a fricking stroke when Wallace asked him to denounce the Proud Boys.

Trump is actually kind of a tragic figure, in a way. All his life, despite all the trappings of wealth/status, he's really just wanted to be accepted by some of the most loathesome people on Earth: the East Coast socialites. And they fricking hate him. Not because he's a con artist, or because he objectifies women, or because he's a shameless classisist, or because he was given the best headstart a person could ask for from his dad and still botched it (most of the EC elite are guilty of some/all of these); but rather because he doesn't understand the basic tenants of old money: he's garish, and he's desperate for attention. Those are cardinal sins of the true elite.

So now he's PUSA and the people who voted him in are the same people he's spent his life mocking. And the presidency has taken him even further away from his true goal: being accepted by those he views as his peers. And they never will because they would never want to be associated with Trump or the people who pulled the lever for him.
quote:

It wouldn't matter which Republican was in office, the Dems would be forcing the same shite sandwich on the American people.


This is such a terrible take.

When was the last time there was this much unrest against a Republican president? This isn't a fight against conservatives--Trump isn't a real conservative anyway; he's an opportunist that goes with whatever he thinks benefits him that second--this is a fight against Trump, pure and simple.

Keep slinging insults my way, though. I'm sure it's cathartic for you, especially in the absence of anything substantive. But understand this: I know I'm in enemy territory. I expect insults.
quote:

The endless riots are motivating the silent majority to speak up publicly finally and have made many change their vote.


:Lol:. Yeah, man. That's what's happening

Who's watch is this happening on?

Unrest is happening BECAUSE of Trump. Very specifically. And despite everything he tries to dodge, the buck stops with the president.

You guys keep pointing at the absence of excitement for Biden, but totally overlook the fact that all of these people in the fricking streets are also voters. And they're fricking pissed we have a racist clown in the White House.

But keep sticking your head in the sand. It only helps Biden.

quote:

The ruling class is purposefully doing this to rub it in our faces; will will try & steal the election.


People aren't voting for Biden because they're excited about him. They're voting for Biden to get Trump out of office. There is no excitement for Biden, but there is excitement about not Trump. That's a very real thing, and you all know it with your TDS and OMB comments you mock us for.

Hate is also a motivator to vote, and people fricking despise trump. Loads of them.

So you can post pics like this all you want to make you feel better, but you're missing the point. Biden doesn't need excitement to win.

re: Second and Third Debates

Posted by MI LSU on 9/29/20 at 10:57 pm
Why would Joe back out of further debates? That was an absolute car crash tonight, and if Trump wants to commit political suicide another two times on national television then Joe would be an idiot to stop him. :lol:

It's the perfect storm. All trump had to do was shut up and let Joe hang himself, but Trump is who he is. He can't shut the frick up even when that's exactly what would help him. It was amusing to watch, but frick it was depressing. Imagine where we are as a country that this is the zenith of political discourse.

The world had so much fricking fun tonight laughing at what we've put forth as our best and brightest. What a joke.

quote:

and remain respectful toward Biden. He usually comes out and does the opposite of what everyone expects.


:Lol:

This is an unmitigated disaster.