WirelessMike

Technically, Ole Miss didn't fire Freeze. I know the concept still applies, regardless, but it's worth noting.

I prefer listening to Blair, but I admit it was entertaining listening to the Auburn game on the radio. Those announcers going on and on about how an obvious block in the back right in front of a ref allowing Chark to score on a punt return was the turning point of the game...

:lol:

The difference is that Coach O gives his backup QB time to play in realistic situations (not up by 20+ points) while the game is on the line against opposing defenses who are challenging the starter, so if the basis for comparison is level of commitment to the freshman QB: I, too, admire that O appears to show more confidence in next season's starter than Saban does (while maintaining dedication to Etling).

It's a good game, but I agree with most here-- It's no traditional rivalry. In years past, those have been some of the cheapest and easiest tickets to acquire.

Finebaum, as usual, has only the most rudimentary grasp of football culture outside the state of Alabama.

I 100% agree that it's healthy to keep an open mind and question scientific findings, even when there is an obvious consensus, as there is with climate change.

That said, how many times has the argument "I'm right and you're stupid" worked out for anyone? Does that typically encourage someone to put in a little personal research to challenge their own stance on something? I agree with the earlier notion that there are more adult ways to debate and far better methods of persuasion.

My research tells me there is, indeed, an overwhelming consensus that (1) climate change is real and (2) humans are a major factor in it, but the worst thing that could possibly have happened regarding the threat of climate change and the need to address it is that it got politicized. I'm conservative, and I'm christian, so within my own social circles I end up at odds with friends and family regarding this subject at times, but not because of the subject matter so much as the politics associated with it.

I'm not going to stop being libertarian because I acknowledge climate change, and I shouldn't have to argue about it mired in politics. I shouldn't have to argue about it at all-- Better to put a seed of curiosity in those that disagree with me while showing that I'm always willing to challenge my own opinion, so why not challenge yours? A better variety of ways to address it will only come after its existence and/or causes stop being a political issue.

Maybe Coby Fleener and Zach Ertz of Stanford?

quote:

---

quote:
Barkevious "Kiki" Mingo Sam Montgomery Devastating DE duo.
I'm not sure you read the question correctly....

---

Good point-- The NFL careers didn't play out there.

Devery Henderson
Michael Clayton
Dwayne Bowe
Craig "Buster" Davis

quote:

---

Curly Hallman won more SEC games 3/4 years here than Oregeron did in 3 seasons combined.

---

Yet without coaching a full season, Orgeron has already won as many games in a single season as Hallman did in any full season as HC of LSU. Orgeron has also won more SEC games in a single season than Hallman (again, without being HC the entire season). Orgeron will also be coaching a bowl game for LSU-- How many times did Hallman do that?

Based on any single season as HC of LSU, Hallman was worse. If you can recall a game you watched with Hallman as HC, you'd know this is no comparison.

By the way-- Hallman came to LSU from Southern Miss with a much better record than Orgeron's at Ole Miss.

To the point: Do you honestly believe Orgeron is going to be a worse HC at LSU than Hallman was? Does anybody?

Just sayin'.