Macavity92

1. The judge did not rule that deporting illegals is unconstitutional. The judge ruled that Trump could not use the AEA to deport them, which presumably would require the more onerous use of immigration law, hearings, etc.

2. This is a district court. There will be appeals. Hopefully, the government laid a sufficient evidentiary foundation to allow the court of appeals and Supreme Court to rule in their favor.

And yet, here we are, with a 6 run lead in the bottom of the 8th.

Maybe, perhaps, just maybe, our NC winning coach knows more about baseball than the average poster on this board?

Isn’t every vote he casts in Cali a new violation and crime or part of a continuing criminal enterprise such that the statute only started running, at the earliest, in Nov. 2024?

quote:

---

I don't understand the outrage.

---

I do. The legal literacy rate in this country is almost nonexistent. But your analysis was on point.

With the exception of Korea, Vietnam, Russia, Ukraine, Israel, Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, Afghanistan, Rwanda, Somalia, Argentina, the UK, Cambodia, India, Pakistan, and probably more, not to mention international terrorism.

Read about FDR's first term. Judges, and specifically the Supreme Court, came within inches of derailing the New Deal.

You can say that again.

Gotta love LSU fans. A perfect season for them would be an undefeated team, winning the national championship, and firing the head coach.

Neither was Elon Musk. Maybe we need someone else to run DOGE.

The problem isn't that they're foreign born, it's that they're willing to adopt tortured interpretations of the law to fit their liberal world view.

The National Archive website tells you that there is more to come.