baybeefeetz

Fall apart= trashy
Get hurts= logical. It’s the NFL

Thoughtful response by DA’s office.

Everybody is saying redhead

WTF?? 4, 5, 6, and 7 didn’t even frick her??????

According to that.

idk man. If people are allowed to bet on stupid shite like this and a guy thinks he has low odds of getting a pardon, he ought to be able to bet the fricking house on it.

You sir, are a good thinker. Thumbs up.

Decent chance one of those guys - at least - did stuff to her without her really even appreciating it all. But guess what - that's hard enough to prove withou having given a goddamn sworn statement to the contrary.

At the end of the day, this shite is not feminism. All these people DO NOT want her to be treated as an equal. They want a special standard for women. It's obvious.

you know what, I'll hold out the possibility that she DID NOT consent. The problem for any police or citizens who think she was raped is that she SAID she consented at one point. That makes prosecution hard. By the same token it should make taking her side harder, but as we see, people come up with all kinds of rationalizations. But hey maybe they're right. But the justice system has to have rules and standards.

This is a good question. Why did she go to the police? One immediately should assume it's because she felt she had been victimized. Anybody who cares about justice should have a focus on whether or not it was true. Because as we all know, people go to the cops and say stuff, true and untrue, for various reasons.

agreed that is a big disctincton.

I see that as ultimately being like a George Floyd where far too many people will stop thinking critically and paint with a broad brush about not only what happened here, but basically ... men.

My take is she doesn’t have the same morals as I do but says she engage consensually in the conduct or said it at one time. On those facts, not my business even though I think all need to rethink their lives.

As to whether she truly consented - putting aside what can be proven - it could be that in reality she didn’t consent to all of it. She DEF consented to some of it imo based on what I read.

And I think very poorly of a public campaign to create a one-sided narrative to get money.

With drugs/alcohol and sex, I think men do need to have a higher level of discernment, but I dial down my victim sentiment in these situations. Adults make their own decisions and have to deal with them. I look at the facts and evidence and try not to jump to conclusions either way.

But tbh, the facts aren’t any of my business. Public sentiment and reactions are. I often focus a lot on that.

Then what do you make of her sworn statement and her text the next day? She seemed to remember how many dudes there were and that there was sex?

I think you are not being critical enough given the available evidence.