User Avatar

StraightCashHomey21

Favorite team:West Virginia 
Location:Aberdeen,NC
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:USAF
Number of Posts:126891
Registered on:7/14/2009
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Another expansion of the stadium was a farce

Keep expanding it and struggled to fill it before the first one.
City brings in more than Madrid but playing in front of a half full stadium tonight in the champions league :rotflmao:
That’s two dirty hits from him
No hold there

The RT just tackled him
Bro they are dirty as frick tonight
That was a dirty arse fricking hit
City and their fans with all this arrogance and their banana balloons home and away.

Yet yesterday Ipswich fans brought in balloons with 114 and had them promptly taken away…..
Watford isn’t London



:lol:

Might as well go to Milton Keynes or Luton
quote:

10/10 would go to Crystal Palace v Nottingham.


If its at Palace for sure

Best atmosphere in the EPL

I had an absolute blast at Palace
And it’s a clear sign of guilt and sports washing

The more defiant, lack of remorse and fight they put up. The worse it’s going to get.

The fact they didn’t open their books like everyone else and actively obstructed the investigation screams guilty.
Yep that’s the thing

City was actively breaking the rules they voted for because once they knew they reached a certain level. They could make everyone else non competitive with them.

You literally have ex City executive saying that they actively targeted certain clubs like Villa to keep them from growing their brand so they knicked their players. Or Arsenal because they had to pay off their new stadium.

SFP argument about being denied the chance to grow organically is nonsense. When City were road blocking other clubs to grow and keep doing it now they are at the level they reached.
Them not cooperating with the league and trying to draw this out is a a clear sign they are guilty

Everyone else opens their books when needed
City were paying over the odds before these massive Sky contracts……

And didn’t bring in enough revenue to cover this spending
Etihad was saying they were not getting extra funding to sponsor City but City saying Etihad was getting extra funds is wild :rotflmao:
I used to get a lot of shite for saying City are the reason why wages and transfers fees exploded in the EPL

Well this proves it, fake sponsorships so they could purchase players over the odds on wages no one else could pay.

Remember they broke the English transfer record the day of the take over…..
City brought in more “revenue” than Madrid


That’s fricking laughable
quote:

No. Something City was able to do because they didn't make terrible deals like Sancho, Antony, Sanchez, Onana, Casemiro, etc. I didn't even include Di Maria because you recovered enough after the one terrible season.


That’s insane, City has mad plenty of terrible purchases and could afford to just off load them because they cheated



quote:

That was only temporary. Look at the recent spending


That’s nonsense
quote:

Which teams have grown organically into a consistent title threat in the EPL the past 50 years? Clearly Chelsea and Man City don't count.


Liverpool basically had to hit the reset button and grow itself back. Remember they were hours from going bust.

Did they just throw money around like gang busters at first? Nope

Did they have a strong fan base to build off of? Yes
quote:

How has it not?


Because no one can compete with unlimited resources and being owned by a fricking nation.

quote:

Clearly it's more expensive to overcome the institutional barriers than it is to operate once you overcome them. Just look at the differences in net spend between Man U and Man City the past 5 years


Because United has been throwing shite at the wall trying to catch up while not having the unlimited funds like City. City has also been able to off load players they paid over the odds for after a season or two while United haven’t been. A lot of that is because of squad depth and quality. Something City was able to do because they cheated.