Ponson416
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | Lafayette, LA |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | football, boxing, guitar, outdoor activities |
| Occupation: | DHT Service Engineer |
| Number of Posts: | 4390 |
| Registered on: | 10/24/2008 |
| Online Status: |
Recent Posts
Message
re: POSITIGER NATION !!! (tuba can't keep up!) HUNDREDS SERVED!
Posted by Ponson416 on 9/7/09 at 12:33 am to SpidermanTUba
sign me up :geauxtigers:
does constructive criticism count?
quote:
ETA 1: Fellow positigers, help me keep this list true. If you catch anyone on it being down on LSU after a win, show me the thread and I'll take them off the list
does constructive criticism count?
0
re: If the Vandy game is close.....
Posted by Ponson416 on 9/7/09 at 12:28 am to thelawisafterme
quote:
Bayou Lafouche isn't exactly a tourist attraction.
It can be... if you're wanting to see the largest sewage river
re: Josh Downs will be the next Glenn Dorsey
Posted by Ponson416 on 9/6/09 at 11:23 pm to Fisticuffs
D-Line looked pretty solid. That wasn't the problem. Wasn't Chavis originally a D-line coach?
LSU 42
Vandy 17
I think they open up the offensive playbook a little more this game. I think Jefferson will run and pass all over their asses. Tolliver will catch 2 five yard receptions and get 40-60 YAC. Secondary will hopefully get their shite together. Scott will run some fools over.
Vandy 17
I think they open up the offensive playbook a little more this game. I think Jefferson will run and pass all over their asses. Tolliver will catch 2 five yard receptions and get 40-60 YAC. Secondary will hopefully get their shite together. Scott will run some fools over.
re: I can have no opinon until after vandy
Posted by Ponson416 on 9/6/09 at 11:10 pm to TigerTicker
quote:
Problem is, this score prediction looks eerily similar in point differential to most LSU-Washington predictions.
My prediction for Washington was 35-10.
I'm being optimistic. I guess I'm just hoping MAJOR improvements are made this week.
quote:
But that will not happen. We will CRUSH vandy
LSU 42
Vandy 17
:geauxtigers:
O-line and D-Secondary need some improvement. Other than that, can't say anything bad about the rest... except punting
re: This is just not good
Posted by Ponson416 on 9/6/09 at 10:45 pm to texastigerr
On a glass half full note... all those yards and only 23 pts allowed. Not saying this is good though
re: Washington 3rd & Longs
Posted by Ponson416 on 9/6/09 at 10:43 pm to CU-onda-BIU
This should be posted on all of the Defensive Players lockers.... and Chavis' office door
shite... might as well laminate it to his desk also
shite... might as well laminate it to his desk also
quote:
6. LSU's D is a 1st and 2nd down monster! 3rd and long........not so much
Just watched the replay on CST. They were ripping heads off on 1st and 2nd down. Secondary needs some work
quote:
Not a chance in hell
There's always a chance.
Signed,
Stanford
quote:
the better they do the better we look
How you say? That is BINGO?
re: What do you Rantards want?
Posted by Ponson416 on 9/6/09 at 3:22 pm to cardee2003
quote:
I think we could have pass more and opened the offense up
A good pass block is required for this. I'm not sure if our OL was playing that bad, or their DL was playing that good. But, it wasn't a pretty picture. Run block was pretty much non existent also.
quote:
True, they missed a field goal, but that was set up by bad pass interference call on Taylor.
horrible.... horrible call
I'm pleased that we won... I'm not pleased that it was a sloppy win
quote:
probably move up 2 spots in the rankings.
I hope to God not.... they should stay right where they are. When they look like #11, then we can talk about possibly moving up.
quote:
I wish we had ULL before Vandy really.
they played well last night.... then again, they played Southern
I think my excuse was less lame than that
quote:
Any one else got a lame arse excuse for us sucking?
I opened my purple and gold beer can before they lined up to kick off. I was told it was bad luck.
Popular
13
