Beef Supreme

quote:

---

16-49 even WITH that season...

---

37 of those 49 losses have been by double digits.

Thirty

fricking

Seven

quote:

---

Wade fixes that problem immediately.

---

I buy my family season tickets the day he is announced. Anyone else and I don't. I wait and see. I don't think I'm alone. It's that simple for Verge and the board.

quote:

---

only thing that saved him was going into ADs office and saying give me more NIL money

---

The only thing that saved him was that Will Wade was there for the taking and Woodward was our AD. If Wade signs the NC St deal a year prior, Scott fires MM last year. But b/c there would have been so much pressure to hire WW and Scott absolutely wasn't going to do that, he kicked the can down the road another year. And it ultimately cost him his job.

I'm in favor of common sense press reform.

Bumping to update the total.

[quote]He’s happy at a basketball school[/quote

I think the Wade haters overhype NC St as a prestigious basketball school a bit. They're the 3rd best program in their state and the gap between them and 2 is huge. The gap between them and 4 (WF) is not.

They do have 2 titles but the last one was in 1983.
In the last 20 years they have just 2 more ncaa tournament appearances as us and one of those they werent going to make it until they won their conference tourney. That same year their fluke run continued and they went to the final four... but thats their only appearance in the final four in those 44 years since their title. We've been twice in that time span.

If the argument is support - sure. NC St's revenue share program provided $1m more than LSU's did to their respective basketball teams. I'm pretty sure that difference and then some can be made up to lure Wade away. Our athletic department as a whole generated over $100m more in revenue last year than nc st did. 223m vs 120m. Almost double the revenue - they're not gonna be able to out-bid us if we really want Wade.

quote:

---

Yeah I guess in theory winning the SEC tourney could get you in, so you have to "let him have the full chance".

---

I've always thought a mid-season firing for basketball would be pointless but this comment may have me changing my mind. In the highly unlikely event that we run the table in the SECT and make it in, he would have momentum to keep his job and hang around for next hear. And we cant hold the future of our program hostage in the event they go on a 4 game miracle run in the tourney. I think Verge would be best to make the move later in the season but before the tourney.

quote:

---

How do you and Massie propose we deport the illegals if ICE doesn’t have any funding?

---

Funny you should ask!

Did you know that this funding bill cuts deportation and enforcement funding to the tune of $115m? Or that it cuts out 5500 beds in detention centers? Or that in order to make those cuts yet still keep the same level of funding as prior years (so as not to alarm people who dont care enough to look into it) it shifts that money to body cameras, over sight and de-escalation training?

It is amazing that you think true Libertarians follow a national party and platform that speaks for all of them. That alone would break a core tenant of Libertarianism which is individualism!

Step away from team politics for a moment. I know more than a few people who say they are more libertarian than republican because of the way the Republican Party has operated. I can bet those same people would read the platform you just posted and say "...yeah I'm more conservative than that". You don't have to align 100% with what a party defines itself as. I would say if you do then congratulations you are a useful and controllable tool to them. And if that's what you want - to allow others to form your stances on issues and speak for you then more power to you. But to those of us who choose to form our own opinions you look no different than those on the left.

I'm not down with the points made about anarchy or open borders. You and I are in agreement.

But I do have the following to comment on:

quote:

---

They talk about WORLD not USA

---

and? "America First" =/= "America Only". Do you really think it is impossible to be America first and also hope that the world frees itself from tyranny?

quote:

---

That says if a guy wants to act like a girl and the organization decide to allow IT to compete against girls.... That's his right.

---

That is not at all what it says. That is an incredible leap to make. You are reading what you want it to say rather than what it actually says which is "....so long as they do not forcibly interfere with the equal right of others to live in whatever manner they choose." You also don't even realize what you are typing. "... and the organization decides to allow IT to compete against girls..." that my friend is an organization forcing something onto unwilling participants which is against the statement you were quoting says and the statements that you quote later in the post say.

quote:

---

Conservatives believe in limited Gov as laid out in the Constitution

---

Conservatives haven't exactly lived up to their end of the bargain. For recent examples please see the bill being discussed in this thread.

quote:

---

I certainly don’t think anyone realistically considered that a possibility

---

It was real. Temple, Mallett, and Ballard were in favor of bringing him back. The governor was also involved. They had discussions with his camp and Wade was coming. Scott was against it. In the end the board decided that going over Scott's head and forcing him to hire someone he previously fired and did not support re-hiring would effectively neuter the AD and his authority over Wade.

This has been written about in articles and on here but I heard it last year before any article was written. Behind the scenes the AD and others involced with the basketball program at McNeese were very forthcoming to people about what had happened and thats how the info got out.

quote:

---

Pretty dumb to say this in a thread where your example sides with the democrats

---

You literally said earlier in the thread that you dont give a frick whats attached to the bill. For years Republicans have fought against democrats attaching shite to bills that shouldn't be there.

How you dont understand how libertarians lean right is wild to me.