User Avatar

Death Valley Voice

Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:89
Registered on:11/25/2025
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
I agree, but we all know Bama was going to score again. In a tight game like this it was up to our offense to match Bama, score for score. We had the lead at that point. The margin of victory is not indicative of the success of our defense. That was the gift by our offense.

re: Kiffin has lost me

Posted by Death Valley Voice on 11/9/26 at 2:11 pm to
Well, I'm sure Kiffin is just devastated!
Well, now doesn't that sound like playing a soft defense! Something Baker is getting ridiculed for doing. The big difference here is that Bama knows how to score TD's when they get in position to do so, and LSU...well, they don't.
No, it does not. He failed to mention due to coaching bone-headed decisions.

re: WHIT return

Posted by Death Valley Voice on 11/9/26 at 11:05 am to
You make a good point. Whit would be a welcome return to our defense, but our defense has done a darn good job without him. And Whit does not play offense, so he adds no scoring advantage.
If you look at many of the top match ups, you will see both teams scoring points like 20-30 in some games. That does not mean the losing team's defense broke down. Its part of the game, and Baker's teams do a great job against great offenses. Look at the Miami defense the last 2 games, the won against NC who scored more than 20 points and lost to ND who scored more than 30 points. Yet, all year folks were calling their defense elite. The same thing exists in more of these games. So, Baker's defense giving up a big play or two against a really good offense is not a big breakdown. Its part of the same.
Bama beat us by putting up less offense than we did. And to the point of the original post, we had so many more opportunities. Yet, it wasn't great Bama defense that stopped us...we sh*t the bed on our own opportunities,
Yes, I can. But then again, I'm sure that you and your armchair million-dollar coaches with all your experience know better.
We had a chance to get one yesterday...at Death Valley. How did that work out?
Really! A smart loss is when you give up your rook to point the other player's King in check mate. Then again, I know you're just bullsh***** us!
I'm singing the same tune. Need to realize that Baker and his defense did a great job, especially when you consider the position our offense put them in. We just can't expect Baker to contain an effective scoring offense until our offense decides to score points.
So share with everyone your defensive coordinator success in a key situation above flag football. The point here is that everyone complains about that, even me, but then Baker/LSU is not the only team that does it. There must be something these $3 Million DC's know that we don't. It may be that the offense in those key situations have so many options that we have nothing else to do but play soft to react rather than charge blindly into the gun fire.
Bama scored 31 points and 14 of them were gifts from the offense. I really don't know what everyone expected from our defense beside that. You really think Bama doesn't know how to capitalize from our offensive and OC play calling blunders? Come on, now. You're better than that! If you want to complain about the loss, blame it on our red zone offense. Four opportunities in the 1st half and 3 come away with 3 points.
Baker's defense played one heck of a game against a really good offense, so your message is off the mark. The red zone offense is the problem. No one in the free world thought LSU would completely shut down Bama offense, but our defense kept us in the ball game until our offense gave the game away. Fourth down and 10 from inside your 30 yd line and you go for it? Against Bama??? C'mon man!
Not. Gonna. Happen.
We will lose to either TX or TN, and possibly both. Settling for 3 points in the red zone didn't just happen yesterday. And this late in the season, you're not going to fix it. As evidenced yesterday, a team can move the ball 450-500 yds a game, but if you can't scorre TD's its all wasted.
Why is Baker leaving? Last year he turned down the HC job at Tulane, his alma mater. That was as good an opportunity as he could have expected to launch his career toward bigger and better opportunities.
Finally, a reasonable, thoughtful comment. Yes, on any given Saturday, I believe most teams in the top 17 could either win or lose to any other team in the top 17. Home games matter, injuries matter, team planning and execution matter, in-game adjustments matter. With NIL, there is sufficient talent of skill players on all these teams that, with any circumstances, could affect the outcome of the game. That's why we're seeing scenarios where team 1 beats team 2, who beats team 3, who beats team 1.
It's okay to hate them both, equally! Don't punish yourself over this.

re: Win out and all is forgotten.

Posted by Death Valley Voice on 10/12/26 at 1:57 pm to
Texas and Bama will beat us with back-up players in key positions. According to Kiffin, we couldn't beat KY because of the loss of leadership by Weeks, Green, and Spears. That excuse does not float. You have leadership players on both side of the ball that should have stepped up.
I just expected them to win the games they are supposed to win and hopefully squeeze out an upset between Texas, Bama and Tennessee. Having done that, we would be a 2 loss team at season's end. Now, I expect LSU to be a 3 or 4 loss team, likely 4 losses.
Poster asked a legitimate question; his qualifier was "realistically". Your answer was typical BS. Why don't you go ahead now and place your bet on LSU beating Bama, or Texas, or Tenn (at TN, no less). I mean, be realistic and bet big, real big. Because, while we have a "chance" of going undefeated for the remainder of the season, realistically we don't have a snowball chance in hell of doing that, and you know it.