Favorite team:Texas A&M 
Location:From the backwoods of DFW
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:Analyst at the Department of Moral Victories
Number of Posts:9
Registered on:10/27/2025
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: I’m pulling for A&M

Posted by MaroonedLogic on 11/4/25 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

Do you??

It’s so close to GA, they give in-state tuition to GA kids in border counties


So the argument went from “Auburn’s in Georgia” to “well it’s close to Georgia.” That’s a fascinating retreat. Geography by association, next you’ll tell us Tennessee should pull for Kentucky because they share a Cracker Barrel.

re: I’m pulling for A&M

Posted by MaroonedLogic on 11/4/25 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

You and those who upvoted this do not belong on tRant. Really not even the SEC.


Bold move lecturing the SEC on geography when you just got your passport stamped to enter. Auburn’s in Alabama, maybe Google that before you start handing out conference memberships.

re: I’m pulling for A&M

Posted by MaroonedLogic on 11/4/25 at 11:56 am to
quote:

Barn is in Georgia anyway, at least support your state.


Are you serious? Do you not know where Auburn University is?
I was seriously stunned watching this game, and pissed at Miss St...
Yeah, the last name helps but the name didn’t throw 17 unanswered points in the 4th.

Texas was cooked, and Arch kept them alive. That’s not “nepo,” that’s clutch, even if it’s the only time he’s shown it so far this season.

re: CFB is broken

Posted by MaroonedLogic on 10/27/25 at 3:23 pm to
That’s why I’m saying it should be a requirement, not a suggestion.
It would actually cement the arguments between conferences during the season instead of leaving everything to speculation.

Expanded playoffs help, but if they’re filled with reputations instead of real conference-vs-conference results, we’re right back where we started.
He celebrates the idea of greatness before it’s actually earned.

re: CFB is broken

Posted by MaroonedLogic on 10/27/25 at 3:08 pm to
That’s really the core issue, Indiana didn’t schedule a Power 5 opponent, so there’s no outward comparison.

Until every team plays at least one Power opponent, we’re not comparing results anymore, we’re comparing reputations.

re: CFB is broken

Posted by MaroonedLogic on 10/27/25 at 2:59 pm to
The playoff isn’t broken, the calibration is.

College football used to reward proof; now it rewards perception. We’ve built a system where the same five brands play different schedules, in different realities, and somehow get judged on the same scale. The playoff committee doesn’t pick the best teams anymore, they pick the best storylines.

If we actually want balance, we don’t need twelve playoff spots. We need twelve comparable paths. Give everyone nine conference games (ACC), one Power opponent, and no FCS cupcakes after Halloween. Make the schedule mean something again.

Right now, the system doesn’t reward who’s best, it rewards who’s least questioned. Fix that, and the sport starts to feel honest again.