Footballguy1800

The risk is simply too high to be locked into 10 years, or have to fork up over $70,000,000. The next hire could be the exact same thing as this again which would require forking up $120 mil over a 4 to 5 year span. That's a reality that every fan must realize. Most don't want to think that it could be, but it could be the exact same thing again.

My advice is to go get the Ferris St head coach who led them and Chambliss to 50+ striaght wins and back to back to back Nati's in D2. Sign him to a 2 year, $3 mil contract. He only makes $200k per year now. He'd obviously sign that as it over 7x's his income, along with the notoriety of HC for LSU. If he sucks, buyout is easily manageable, sub $1 mil. You can continue to do this until maybe the 2nd or 3rd one works. That's only if the 1st one doesn't work, which it could.. This is at most a 4 year process. That is significantly better than giving a head coach a 10 year, $100 mil contract who sucks, then you have to accept mediocrity for 10 seasons. It also frees up so much money for NIL which is the only thing that players care about as evidenced by Texas Tech. We would afford to buy a much better roster with a head coach who isn't as financially demanding. Revenue sharing only adds another $20 million expense to the program leaving only less money to go to coaches. That's how the NFL works. Good players make more money than coaches.

I don't care what head coach you are a team of, winning 94 of the last 100 games and 3 Nati's in a row is elite. And he's only making $200k. I think going a route like this is exponentially better. There's absolutely no risk. His buyout would be $1.5 mil after just 1 season.

College football is stuck in a model that existed because there was no NIL or revenue share to go to players, so it freed up cash for coaches. That no longer exists. I think BK has 2 more years if I'm being honest unless Todd Graves has had enough. Todd, we all love you.

I don't care if someone disagrees with me, because I know as well as 1+1 equals 2, that this is absolutely the best way to do this. Moneyball. There is no argument against it. Oh, he sucks after 1 year? $1.5 mil buyout. Next FCS nati coach comes here after him, and goes 10-2 in his first year? Bam, problem solved. And you just saved $100,000,000 that can go to NIL. Money Ball for College Football

Never assume that because a process exists today, that it means it's the most efficient. Picture life in 1400. Picture life today. That change is solely because some people thought there was a better way to do something.

I think 2017 Etling is significantly better than Nuss. For the reason his TD to INT was 16:2. He averaged 9.0 YPA which blows Nuss out of the water. We should've passed more that season. He only had 275 attempts over 13 games.

His buyout is $53 million. That would be the 2nd biggest buyout in College Football history. I don't see it happening. It all depends on Todd Graves. He is going to be the only one who has disposable income to at least put up over 50% of that. I don't even think Gordon is worth $53 mil in total net worth.

I would rather have a coach that goes 7-5 for 4 years in a row, then pops off for an undefeated season once every 5 years, than a coach that constantly goes 9-3 and an 8-4 every year.

Chester single handedly took off 7 points at least vs Vandy. He killed a 1st down I believe with a holding, and then completely whiffed a DE that went untouched and sacked Nuss. He's horrible.

I rented my car out on Turo. It's legit. I made sure to clean mine before each time. I did kind of screw over someone because they dropped the car off at airport, and I was to meet them, but I was late. They just left the keys in the gas tank, parked close to the terminal, and walked.

A&M Defense let up 42 to Ark and ND. They're hit or miss. Sounds like they miss on the road. So defense doesn't travel.

quote:

---

UCLA fired everyone

---

That's how it should be. Whenever a coach's name gets on the hot seat, it never works out, then you drag your feet for another 2 years solidifying a lesser program stance. Only case I can think of that was maybe the opposite, but not really, was Coach O. He went 9-3 in 2017 and 2018, so I don't think he was really on the hot seat pre-Nati, but the next season when he sucked and was for sure on the hot seat, it never got better.

Ole Miss wa a 6-6 program that he turned into a 10-2, at worst 9-3 program. LSU ceiling is higher than Ole Miss. He would be a much better coach than BK.

I'd love him if he bought out BK, and then we hired Cignetti. Then pawn off BK on another college like Va Tech, so we don't have to pay the entirety. Buyouts aren't a lump sum, they just continue paying him as if he were still employed weekly... another school picking him up would decrease it.