Favorite team:New Orleans Pelicans 
Location:New Orleans
Biography:Native of Sulphur, SHS class of ''88, LSU, class of ''92, law school at William & Mary, class of ''95. Live in N.O. now
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:7563
Registered on:8/13/2004
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
I have no problem with Ukraine fighting for their country. It’s Red Dawn but for real for them. But I do question whether it was smart to hit the bombers. Did that help them?

re: AOC thinks it's funny

Posted by N.O. via West-Cal on 6/5/25 at 7:59 pm
Well, that is kinda funny.
“41 year olds who have $400 mil in career earnings aren’t seeking out New Orleans as a place to live and work? Shocking development”

Agreed, although we are talking about how many people? In any case, he would have a wonderful life, insulated from basically everything that makes life difficult here for many.
The idea that an incredibly wealthy person earning tens of millions of dollars would have a “poor standard of living” in Louisiana is ridiculous. This is not to excuse our problems, which are are real and manifold, but do you really think he would be hurting in, say, a historic Garden District mansion? Please …
Running massive budget deficits is one of the few issues that enjoys broad bipartisan support.
The theoretical basis for this argument is that the side imposing the tariffs ends up harming itself, with the free trading country becoming wealthier as a result. There is substantial support for this point of view in terms of overall efficiency but that misses things like reliability (eg, it may be most efficient to get all of a certain drug from China … until a pandemic hits, a war breaks out, etc.). If you look back, even free trade advocates like Reagan realized that you had to exercise trade policy to keep things from getting too out of whack. Finally, Big Scrub linked to an insightful piece on trade over the weekend. I recommend it.
Thanks for linking to that piece. With our political battle lines so clearly drawn, it can be hard to find anything that seems like a fresh assessment of what is going on without falling into the trap of interpreting everything to fit one’s world view (“owning the libs,” “Orange Man Bad,” etc.). I feel like Holman Jenkins at WSJ achieves this with some regularity, and the piece you linked did so, as well, and from a little different perspective.
“The right has definitely done a 180 on free speech this year.”

I’ll give it to you on that. I’m concerned. It’s a little more complicated with visa holders but still …
I have seen one and only one. I would not have known what it was had I not read an article about Chinese cars and how difficult it was to get one here. this was a few months ago, so pre-tariff.
That was a very interesting answer. The criminal said that he respected the US president for trying to protect his people.
I am right there with St Aug. I didn’t like the QBs enough in this draft to want any of them available at pick 40, but now I hope he’s ROY and future HOF. And at least personality wise, he seems easy to pull for.
"As a journalist, how do you not have a follow-up question, “What do you mean for his own safety, sir.” Our media has destroyed this country."

Great point! That was awful. A better interviewer follows up immediately with a question like the one you propose. I took Bolton's statement as a (likely unsupported) suggestion that Hegseth's carelessness with Signal chats, etc. endangered not only American interests but Hegseth's own safety. Most on this board seem to take it as more of threat, presumably from some deep state actors. There may be other ways to understand Bolton's odd statement. A better interviewer gets Bolton to explain what he meant, right then and there.
Well played, President Trump. Putin has to have a reason to make a deal. Press hard on him and Zelensky.
“historically false”

do you care to elaborate?
I really enjoyed his work when he was in character. As a host, he is almost painfully unfunny.
I’d take Taylor over Jones if he is still around. But I wanted the Penn State TE in round one. I am not a true believer in what we have but think that if you get it right, TE can be an incredible to an offense.

No knock at Jones and would be fine with coming in to play G.
I don’t see a great deal of difference between lawyers and the general population in terms of ethics or personal morality. Nor do I see much difference in terms of whether they lean left or right, though my sense is that on a national level, they may lean slightly to the left. However, you have to take into account that there are more lawyers in major metro areas, which themselves lean left. The examples you give regarding various filings on deportations, etc., suggest that you may be confusing the positions a lawyer takes on behalf of a client and the lawyer’s own personal beliefs. Also, at least some lawyers—myself included—value certain principles above the outcome in a specific case. For example, I am appalled at what the administration did in ignoring the court order with Garcia even though I generally applaud what the admin has done with clamping down on illegal immigration. Whether this makes me a degenerate scumbag is for others to judge, but my good faith reason for feeling this way is that I value due process and separation of powers (in this case, the Supreme Court has made its ruling and it should be followed rather than circumvented).
I didn’t know that all 13 colonies required a declaration of faith, but I do know that the Constitution rejected that approach in the Religious Rest Clause:

“no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

In my view, it’s more accurate to say that the US was founded by people who were mostly (but not all) Christian, all of whom were products of the Western intellectual tradition, which is shot through with Christian concepts. The founders did not, however, establish the US as a Christian nation, and they made this explicit in the First Amendment.
If he’s frozen out up there, I’m OK with this. With Carr out, they’re going to get a vet. Why not JW?
Hey, how about WE start bombing UKR, too!? That would also end it fast.