Favorite team:New Orleans Pelicans 
Location:New Orleans
Biography:Native of Sulphur, SHS class of ''88, LSU, class of ''92, law school at William & Mary, class of ''95. Live in N.O. now
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:7692
Registered on:8/13/2004
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
I am under the belief—hopefully correct—that Zion is being shopped and will not be around next year. You can’t have a cornerstone salary going to someone you just can’t build around.
"Herb shoot awful tonight and he still was the only player other than Jose with a positive +/-. Herb was the only reason our defense wasn't cover your eyes horrible tonight."

I am open to trading Herb. Heck, I am open to trading anyone on a team as abysmal as this one, but I think that even in these days of advanced metrics, defense gets overlooked. At least with Herb, you have somebody playing good defense, making things difficult on your opponent's best wing scorer. Aside from Herb, does anyone on this team play defense? Jose does, but he doesn't start, and he can be a matchup problem because of his size. Anyone else that I am missing?

In short, I hate it that Herb has not been able to (1) stay healthy or (2) recapture his 40% 3PT shooting, but don't undervalue what he does provide, especially with us having so few players who can D up.
I think I just read a condensed version of Animal Farm.

re: Pelican Defense

Posted by N.O. via West-Cal on 1/2/26 at 2:26 pm to
Very interesting post. I know we are bad on defense but hadn’t thought so deeply as to why.

A couple of things based admittedly on the eye test:

1. Zion is sometimes hilariously lazy in closeouts. It’s anecdotal but I bet you could with some Hardenesque lowlights from him.

2. I don’t seeDQ as all that bad a defender. He most stays in front and holds his ground and he is at least a pretty good defensive rebounder. Also not terrible on closeouts. I’d enjoy seeing some advanced stats on him to see I might be onto something or perhaps to show that I am letting my basketball crush on DQ skewing my opinion.

3. This is more hope than anything else, but I would think that an all time defender like Dumars would value and be able to evaluate defensive ability/potential going forward. I have this sense that we could be decent in short order if we could improve just a little on defense and add a shooter.
I would not overpay even for interior OL help. We have spent enormous capital on this OL and have little to show for it. Instead, make prudent decisions and hope for help via trades and draft picks in R3-7. You can find decent G and C in those rounds. This team’s most dynamic ball carrier this year has been Taysom Hill. Our most dynamic WR is Olave. We are woefully deficient in playmaking. That has to be the priority with the high picks.
No need to overstate it, but the president could have said nothing and chose instead to make vile, nonsensical comments about a double murder in a way that centered the tragedy on himself when he had nothing to do with it. In short, the president embarrassed himself.

It doesn’t mean you have to change your policy positions or start voting for Democrats. But this is an easy one. Trump screwed up.
If we can fix some of the issues by moving people around on the OL, that’s even more reason to after a playmaker. Our OL is, unfortunately, not good but I don’t think it’s garbage, either. Improve the line, sure. But this team sorely needs a playmaker.
I’m not disagreeing. But I’d rather not take the Bengals route where we find a QB and get him killed every year because we just get playmakers and skimp on offensive lineman.”

The saints haven’t skimped on OL is the problem; they’re just not that great as a unit. We can upgrade the guards without using a R1 pick.
This team sorely needs playmakers. Address OL issues in later rounds or through trades/free agency, with depth more the goal than going for a stud starter. I repeat: this team needs playmakers. We literally have NO ONE AT ANY POSITION who scares opposing defenses now that Shaheed is gone.

I know he had the injury, but if it looks like he will get back to speed reasonably soon, I would love taking Chris Bell if we can get him very late in the first or early in the second round. I know they never do it, but I think this would be a great draft to trade back so that we have two first rounders instead of one, and I would make sure one of them is a game breaking, contested catch, YAC guy.
Yeah, I’m catching up and see that others have raised this issue. This will likely be one or the rare decisions I read all the way through.
“The fact that they can arrest/deport them implies jurisdiction.”

Maybe, but Indians were subject to arrest, and they were not citizens at the time. I remember being taught the Wong case a long time ago when the issue wasn’t so hot, and my liberal prof questioned whether birthright citizenship was as solidly established as we all assumed at the time.
I don’t know exactly how I feel about this one, but I remember thinking that Wong could be limited to its facts. For example, I don’t think the Chinese were here illegally bc of the absence of comprehensive immigration laws.
Perhaps the main problem with our healthcare "system" is that we don't really have one. Instead, we have a Rube Goldberg machine that evolved almost haphazardly over the course of decades. It's a mix of socialism, capitalism, regulation, and perverse incentives. At least in my estimation, the ACA made things even worse. In short, no one ever "invented" our system, and Lord is it a mess. On the plus, side, you can still get some of the best treatment in the world.

I love this board. Hardly anyone wants to address the issue, which is that when you lose independents, you lose elections. Of course, this very MAGA board is mostly pleased with Trump, but independents see sticky inflation and things they probably didn’t vote for, such as the ICE raids, extrajudicial assassination of likely drug dealers, and a chaotic tariff regime. I bet some first term, pre Covid Trump style prosperity would work, though.
I have not cared about any of this BS, but the Saudi is "dressed up" in his culture's traditional mode of dress, while Zelensky was not. Again, I don't give a damn, but the two are not comparable.
:lol:

I have had this same thought many times. So true.
Great thread. I’m with the majority who see a really high ceiling, held back only by limited athleticism and good but not overwhelming height/length. Could you ever see DQ as first or second All NBA? I don’t think so, but how crazy is it that we can even ask the question.

Here is something to think about, say at the midpoint of the season: where would DQ have been drafted if there was a redraft? I suspect all will agree he would be MUCH higher.

re: Y’all miss BI yet

Posted by N.O. via West-Cal on 11/20/25 at 2:50 pm to
No hate here toward BI at all. I don’t think he is a #1 that you can build around.
Great question and I think the great weight of the evidence supports the first of the two choices: well meaning, largely principled conservatives who made some poor choices and who believed too much in the cause of liberty and the ability of America’s armed forces to promote the cause of liberty even in cultures that lack the prerequisite attributes.
"You could maybe argue the Spurs but that's a very unique outlier where you had a future MVP in Kawhi, a former one in Duncan"

Because of this, I wouldn't even call the Spurs an outlier. They just had a superstar that was at the end of his career, which was plenty with everything else they had.

In any case, I agree wholeheartedly that it is a star-driven league. Unfortunately, our star plays less than half the time.