Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:86711
Registered on:2/25/2008
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message
I like how you posted this like look at Jake Tapper being dramatic then BoarEd swoops in saying essentially what Tapper is saying and he gets a bunch of upvotes.

China hacking our election was such a big deal that we just rolled out the carpet for the guy :lol:
quote:

Guy was a massive fgt 20 years ago and appears to still be a massive fgt


Pretty wild that everyone moves on in life and careers and whatnot yet this dude is still there just busting balls and being a fig. What a life he must live after 5 pm
quote:

There is nothing badass about you prick. You are a self flagellating narcissist prick. And those are your good qualities. Maybe the booze part is accurate, it would explain a lot.


Big dog, you came at me with some lame arse personal attack and I very gently gave it back to you.

You then flailed your big vagina everywhere.

Maybe the internet is not the right place for you if you’re so sensitive.
Lawfare connotes some level of competency. This had none of that :lol:
I have some limited professional experience with Colin Sims. He’s competent and thorough and a no-nonsense dude. Not a good day to be Laurie White & Co.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
quote:

What, in the DC Circuit's opinion, would stop such a scheme?


Impeachment of the Attorney General or a refusal to fund the offices.
Harris would actually benefit the most from just having AI slop neuralinked into her brain for her to say out loud.
Jack Smith was appointed the same way Robert Hur was :popcorn:
quote:

It is because of who started the thread and why.

You don’t care about judicial activism. You care that it wasn’t weaponized in your favor.


Not really. I care because it’s an interesting wrinkle in a long-running topic on this board.

The phrase “judicial activism” is largely meaningless in the big scheme of things. There’s so much gray in the law that it’s really just the whining of the loser of the issue. There’s no objective truth in the law.
I think you’re majoring in the minors, my dude.

She put the gag order in place. It’s judicial activism. I know it. You know it.

What some other judge does under another set of facts and circumstances and my opinion (and yours) of same is not really germane to the thread.

There will be plenty of other chances to try the “gotcha” on me. This one is a stretch. Just a pro-tip going forward… never piggyback off Rohan. Dude kicks puppies and has real issues.
I put your momma under a gag order to choke on these balls. She complied
I’m not really complaining here. Just calling it what it is.

It’s put her in an interesting spot, though.
I said it’s judicial activism. You said it’s judicial activism.

What is there to address?
I’m glad you acknowledge it’s judicial activism. It’s up on appeal to the 11th. There’s not much for me to “address”.
Keep bombarding that chess board, little pigeon :lol:
And let’s just say someone is indicted and MAL raid is a part of the conspiracy… doesn’t the government have to turn over Jack Smith’s report under its Brady obligation?
Would Judge Cannon be obstructing the grand jury by not letting these agents testify?

Should she have to recuse on this motion in light of that possibility and her being a material witness in the underlying sequence of events?
Every post you make:



That’s a helluva way to go through life.