Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:85590
Registered on:2/25/2008
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: CIA Raided Tulsi’s Office

Posted by boosiebadazz on 5/13/26 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

The CIA is overreaching here, clearly. They're desperate to cover up some really bad stuff.


Gina Haspel fingerfricking corpses following her commando raid in Germany to secure the servers used to steal the 2020 election, no doubt.

re: CIA Raided Tulsi’s Office

Posted by boosiebadazz on 5/13/26 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

Reports are flying about that this has something to do with Fauci and Covid and the WHO and the CIA being involved in all of that.

Fox just did a breaking segment about it.

Fauci was in cahoots with the CIA apparently ... and kept the scam going in order to help steal the 2020 election.


This is why we can’t have nice things.
Rape can’t exist if your society doesn’t acknowledge the concept of consent. How enlightened!

re: CIA Raided Tulsi’s Office

Posted by boosiebadazz on 5/13/26 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

Curious if this is some of the stuff that Bongino found in the basement that have been locked away and behind brick walls.


Darn CIA stealing all the stuff Tulsi found in the burn bags!
Raphael Warnock introduced her and she spoke to a black church the other day after the redistributing decision. She’s certainly making the rounds like someone running for national office.
Those weirdos are probably on video fricking the aliens. Pixelated, of course
DA should file a motion to disgorge her of whatever profit/advance from the book to pay for the retrial. Stupid bitch
The premise that my guy did nothing wrong and their guys did everything wrong cannot be flawed!
Is there something else in the indictment we’ve all been missing?
I haven’t run it down on PACER, but the motion I posted in the OP seems to be the defendant’s opposition to the government’s motion to dismiss his indictment for posts he made on BlueSky.

He’s arguing for dismissal with prejudice while the government is presumably moving for dismissal without prejudice.

His posts are way more incendiary than the seashells and the government is moving to dismiss.

I’ll bet you this case makes it into Comey’s vindictive prosecution motion.
quote:

taint team


Aka STDtiger and AlterEd, but I digress

I’d be surprised if Comey discussed an Instagram post with his lawyer before he made it. Maybe so, but that seems out of the ordinary.

quote:

Don’t forget that the 1st amendment concern runs hand in hand with “could it be reasonably perceived” as a threat, not proving explicit intent


Kinda. Counterman held the standard is the speaker “consciously disregarded a substantial risk that his communications would be viewed as threatening violence”

Substantial risk is going to be tough to prove given that he was not the first, nor the last, to post it.
The motion I posted touches on that. You should read it. It’s only 10 pages.
We live in a post-truth world. You literally flood the zone with shite and there is no objective truth.

Some people even think boys can be girls and vice versa!
He usually does this to rile up the base to distract them from other things that aren’t going well.
quote:

It's precious that you act like arranging seashells on a beach is the most heinous thing this man has ever done in his time in DC.


True or false: it’s the only thing he’s indicted for right now.
quote:

Turns out it's been well tested in Ukraine carrying folks to safety.


Like blood on it and shite?