IMSA_Fan
| Favorite team: | Clemson |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 772 |
| Registered on: | 7/26/2024 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
Yeah this one nails my thoughts about the war
Iran kind of holds the trump card in this knowing the US Congress will not continue to fund this war
Trump Warns Iran ‘Whole Civilization Will Die’
Posted by IMSA_Fan on 4/7/26 at 7:28 am
Yes this is terrifying
I believe that same poll (if you look at the exp polls page) has Dems +6% when they asked voters who they plan on voting for in the congressional election in the fall.
LINK
LINK
You can definitely respond to this. The bigger issue isn’t just how Wang defines the exceptions; it’s who gets to change the rule at all. Birthright citizenship has been settled through the 14th Amendment and long-standing precedent, so altering it should take an act of Congress (or an amendment), not a unilateral shift. Otherwise, you risk a yo-yo effect where one president restricts it and the next expands it again, and the Court generally wants to avoid that kind of instability around something as fundamental as citizenship.
On her argument, saying there’s a “universal rule” with a “closed set of exceptions” isn’t unusual in law. But the weak spot is how fixed those exceptions really are. Once everything hinges on being “subject to the jurisdiction,” you’re in a gray area that can be interpreted different ways. That’s exactly the concern. If the boundaries can shift depending on interpretation, it reinforces why changes should go through Congress to keep the rule consistent and predictable.
On her argument, saying there’s a “universal rule” with a “closed set of exceptions” isn’t unusual in law. But the weak spot is how fixed those exceptions really are. Once everything hinges on being “subject to the jurisdiction,” you’re in a gray area that can be interpreted different ways. That’s exactly the concern. If the boundaries can shift depending on interpretation, it reinforces why changes should go through Congress to keep the rule consistent and predictable.
re: Trump is intentionally looking unhinged.....
Posted by IMSA_Fan on 4/7/26 at 6:34 am to CharlesLSU
The “D” is for dementia
I get the argument you’re making—it’s basically the idea that acting a little “unhinged” can make adversaries think twice. If people on Facebook are saying “Trump is unhinged,” you could imagine Iranian officials thinking he might actually be unpredictable enough to follow through, and that could create some deterrence. There’s a version of that logic that makes sense on the surface.
But there’s also a real “what if” here. What if the recent irrationality and the sharp 180 on foreign policy goals aren’t a strategy at all? When you combine that with what looks like a growing disconnect from his own base—who are loudly focused on affordability—and even side obsessions like things such as a White House ballroom, it can start to feel less like calculated unpredictability and more like something else entirely. Some people would look at that pattern and see not “brilliance,” but a sign he could be mentally deteriorating. Even if that’s not the case, it risks creating confusion abroad and frustration at home, which is a pretty unstable mix.
But there’s also a real “what if” here. What if the recent irrationality and the sharp 180 on foreign policy goals aren’t a strategy at all? When you combine that with what looks like a growing disconnect from his own base—who are loudly focused on affordability—and even side obsessions like things such as a White House ballroom, it can start to feel less like calculated unpredictability and more like something else entirely. Some people would look at that pattern and see not “brilliance,” but a sign he could be mentally deteriorating. Even if that’s not the case, it risks creating confusion abroad and frustration at home, which is a pretty unstable mix.
Idk - this all ends when Trump can’t get funding through the war through congress
Social Security = a form of welfare
re: Here’s the next 1st Lady if the SAVE Act isn’t passed, trying to put a sentence together
Posted by IMSA_Fan on 4/6/26 at 5:57 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
She has two degrees from Stanford. Also, today I learned Gavin used to be married to Kimberly Guilfoyle
The fact they let people retire in their 40’s seems insane to me
I can’t figure out how Trump has gotten so tone deaf. People have been begging him to address affordability issues since his administration started…. then he comes out with this
re: Trump should announce Iran has 72 hours to place 440 kg of enriched uranium
Posted by IMSA_Fan on 4/4/26 at 5:42 am to olgoi khorkhoi
Didn’t Trump say the Iranians could not get to the material because it is so far buried under the underground bunkers where we ordered tactical strikes last year?
I mean job growth has been atrocious
Which other president got sued in court over changes to the White House?
Yeah I kind of have “2-3 weeks” my head as the default / BS answer
re: Nega-Trumpers, where was Biden’s speeches?
Posted by IMSA_Fan on 4/1/26 at 8:30 pm to Make It Rayne
I mean Biden never made a decision as significant as going to war with Iran
What update did you get out of that?
I think that might have been his worst presidental speech ever
GWB announce mission accomplished after 42 days
re: Presidential Address in game thread.
Posted by IMSA_Fan on 4/1/26 at 8:19 pm to dallastiger55
I really hope my tax dollars don’t go to the person that wrote this
Popular
0












