Thicker_Poster
| Favorite team: | Missouri |
| Location: | Fort Worth, TX |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 135 |
| Registered on: | 7/18/2024 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Let's get ahead of this now and get used to 60 million being the new norm.
Posted by Thicker_Poster on 12/29/25 at 1:46 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Mate, you're coming in too hot and going to get whacked soon.
Just trying to keep my fellow board brothers out of the re-education camps.
Gen Z's ultimatum to J.D. Vance.
Posted by Thicker_Poster on 12/29/25 at 10:39 am
We live in Idiocracy
Posted by Thicker_Poster on 12/28/25 at 6:33 am
re: Excitement Level for Tonight’s Game
Posted by Thicker_Poster on 12/28/25 at 5:51 am to Thicker_Poster
My excitement level was justified.
Can't win games when you can't score points.
Can't win games when you can't score points.
re: Dem Governors of CA and NY want people to flee their states
Posted by Thicker_Poster on 12/27/25 at 4:45 pm to dickkellog
Must suck to live a state with state income tax.
re: Dem Governors of CA and NY want people to flee their states
Posted by Thicker_Poster on 12/27/25 at 4:02 pm to OchoDedos
quote:
You get what you pay for Sunshine. If you had thought about your wallet, when you pulled the lever, things might be different
Do you know who she voted for?
Excitement Level for Tonight’s Game
Posted by Thicker_Poster on 12/27/25 at 2:40 pm
Honestly, I almost forgot the game was even on. It just doesn’t have the same feel as the last couple of years. That bowl game against Ohio State? I was amped for that one—AT&T Stadium is only about 30 minutes from my house, so I actually got to go, and the buildup felt big. Last year’s game wasn’t quite that level, but it still felt meaningful because it capped off a 10-win season.
This year just feels… flat.
Part of it is the resume. We didn’t beat a single team with an above-.500 record. At this point, the only real excitement for me is the possibility that Mizzou can finally pull one off against a team with a winning record. That’s it.
Curious where everyone else is at. Are you fired up for this one, or are you feeling about the same as I am?
This year just feels… flat.
Part of it is the resume. We didn’t beat a single team with an above-.500 record. At this point, the only real excitement for me is the possibility that Mizzou can finally pull one off against a team with a winning record. That’s it.
Curious where everyone else is at. Are you fired up for this one, or are you feeling about the same as I am?
re: MAGA is dead, stick a fork in it. Has been successfully co-opted
Posted by Thicker_Poster on 12/27/25 at 10:16 am to ChineseBandit58
Trust the plan
re: MISSOURI’S TEAM
Posted by Thicker_Poster on 12/24/25 at 10:16 am to navynuke
We went to Arrowhead for the first time last year. Traffic sucked getting in, and we had to wait an hour for an Uber to get out.
We went to Jerry's World on Thanksgiving to watch the Chiefs. AT&T Stadium is right outside of Downtown Arlington. We were able to park downtown and take a shuttle from a local bar to and from the stadium. I was able to drive right out with minimal traffic. Had we chosen to Uber, we could have walked a few blocks to Texas Live and waited out the crowd.
It was a much better experience than the Arrowhead one.
We went to Jerry's World on Thanksgiving to watch the Chiefs. AT&T Stadium is right outside of Downtown Arlington. We were able to park downtown and take a shuttle from a local bar to and from the stadium. I was able to drive right out with minimal traffic. Had we chosen to Uber, we could have walked a few blocks to Texas Live and waited out the crowd.
It was a much better experience than the Arrowhead one.
re: Some redacted text in the Epstein files can be read when highlighted
Posted by Thicker_Poster on 12/23/25 at 4:52 pm to hawgfaninc
You don't think this was done on purpose to make some idiots feel like geniuses while playing with their latest distraction?
re: Judges must be held accountable for their decisions on the bench
Posted by Thicker_Poster on 12/22/25 at 6:47 am to L.A.
All have something in common other than multiple arrests.
re: Vance says Fuentes can ‘eat shite’ for attacking his wife & defends Tucker
Posted by Thicker_Poster on 12/22/25 at 6:42 am to Privateer 2007
You should have a debate with Fuentes over foreign policy.
re: Vance says Fuentes can ‘eat shite’ for attacking his wife & defends Tucker
Posted by Thicker_Poster on 12/22/25 at 6:38 am to hawgfaninc
Edgy :rolleyes:
re: It’s…. Official
Posted by Thicker_Poster on 12/21/25 at 6:30 pm to GalacticaCannon
Passing Yards
185.8
107th
Rushing Yards
213.2
15th
Points For
27.6
71st
185.8
107th
Rushing Yards
213.2
15th
Points For
27.6
71st
re: You can arrest them, but if Judge and Jury are Libs, they Walk Away
Posted by Thicker_Poster on 12/21/25 at 6:10 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Stuff like this is going to lead to Trump invoking the insurrection act and then it will be game over.
Trump won't do anything but complain about it.
re: Trump is "Deep State?"Why's the DS Been Attacking Him & Trying to Destroy Him For 10 Yrs?
Posted by Thicker_Poster on 12/21/25 at 3:57 pm to Thicker_Poster
And let’s be honest about one thing everyone already agrees on: Trump is a dealmaker. That’s literally his brand.
So why would anyone assume that politics is the one arena where he suddenly refuses to make deals—especially when the stakes involve his freedom, his finances, and his family’s future?
If making a deal ensured protection, stability, and a clear path back to power, it would be perfectly on-brand. Powerful people don’t survive by being reckless forever; they survive by knowing when to negotiate.
That doesn’t make him weak. It makes him practical.
But it does mean people should stop pretending that everything happening right now is organic or accidental.
So why would anyone assume that politics is the one arena where he suddenly refuses to make deals—especially when the stakes involve his freedom, his finances, and his family’s future?
If making a deal ensured protection, stability, and a clear path back to power, it would be perfectly on-brand. Powerful people don’t survive by being reckless forever; they survive by knowing when to negotiate.
That doesn’t make him weak. It makes him practical.
But it does mean people should stop pretending that everything happening right now is organic or accidental.
re: Trump is "Deep State?"Why's the DS Been Attacking Him & Trying to Destroy Him For 10 Yrs?
Posted by Thicker_Poster on 12/21/25 at 3:56 pm to KCT
Or maybe it’s the opposite: they went after him hard at first… and then quietly backed off.
You can argue Trump “won in court,” but the reality is that after years of investigations, raids, indictments, and nonstop media hysteria, nothing actually landed. No major consequences. No accountability for the people who pushed false narratives. No arrests tied to the things you listed. It all just… stalled.
And notice what has happened since then. His political enemies aren’t trying to destroy him anymore—they’re just blocking him from governing. That’s a very different posture.
What also raises eyebrows is how aligned he now seems with establishment power brokers he once claimed to oppose. Figures like Mark Levin and other AIPAC-aligned voices appear far more influential than before. This is also the first time Trump has fully embraced major donor money—something he explicitly rejected in 2015–2016 when he ran as an outsider.
Back in 2021-23, it genuinely felt like they’d never let him near the White House again. Then, suddenly, Democrats run a historically weak, last-minute candidate, almost guaranteeing his return. At the same time, Big Tech shifts: Zuckerberg, Musk, and social media platforms that once opposed him now lean his way. That doesn’t happen by accident.
This version of Trump feels different—more restrained, more managed, less chaotic. Like someone finally figured out how to put guardrails on him.
So maybe the question isn’t why they attacked him…
It’s why the attacks stopped—and what changed behind the scenes when they did.
You can argue Trump “won in court,” but the reality is that after years of investigations, raids, indictments, and nonstop media hysteria, nothing actually landed. No major consequences. No accountability for the people who pushed false narratives. No arrests tied to the things you listed. It all just… stalled.
And notice what has happened since then. His political enemies aren’t trying to destroy him anymore—they’re just blocking him from governing. That’s a very different posture.
What also raises eyebrows is how aligned he now seems with establishment power brokers he once claimed to oppose. Figures like Mark Levin and other AIPAC-aligned voices appear far more influential than before. This is also the first time Trump has fully embraced major donor money—something he explicitly rejected in 2015–2016 when he ran as an outsider.
Back in 2021-23, it genuinely felt like they’d never let him near the White House again. Then, suddenly, Democrats run a historically weak, last-minute candidate, almost guaranteeing his return. At the same time, Big Tech shifts: Zuckerberg, Musk, and social media platforms that once opposed him now lean his way. That doesn’t happen by accident.
This version of Trump feels different—more restrained, more managed, less chaotic. Like someone finally figured out how to put guardrails on him.
So maybe the question isn’t why they attacked him…
It’s why the attacks stopped—and what changed behind the scenes when they did.
Popular
0












