Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:22
Registered on:1/10/2024
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: redacted

Posted by Crimson97 on 1/21/25 at 8:21 am
Mickey Mouse was the wrong term, they were the best team, but you get my point.

redacted

Posted by Crimson97 on 1/21/25 at 8:11 am

Given how bad michigan is - No win situation for Deboer

re: Bully Ball

Posted by Crimson97 on 12/3/24 at 12:11 pm
Are there any advanced analytics on the number of negative run plays we have had this year as compared to the previous few years?

Feels like we have multiple per drive and sometimes they are for a 3 yard loss.

re: Bully Ball

Posted by Crimson97 on 12/3/24 at 11:15 am
Fair point, and I might be overreacting. In the past Bama teams wouldn't have let VANDY push them around for 3 yards a pop in the 4th quarter.

I don't know the xs and os and it could have simply been a schematics/execution problem more so than a conditioning/toughness problem.

Its certainly been less of a problem on defense.

re: Bully Ball

Posted by Crimson97 on 12/3/24 at 11:12 am
I could care less how many times they run or pass, I just think there should be an emphasis on being physically imposing versus winning track meets. Its a mindset if you will regardless of the actual play calls.

Deboer seems to be moving away from Sabans philosophy on beating your opponent 1 play at a time and thus wearing them down in the fourth quarter and is instead focused on the outcome of winning the game.

re: Bully Ball

Posted by Crimson97 on 12/3/24 at 10:07 am
true, but if you look at the season as a whole - South Carolina, Ten, Vandy and oklahoma were all more physical.

re: Bully Ball

Posted by Crimson97 on 12/3/24 at 10:05 am
Michigan was an incredibly run heavy team last year. JJ mccarthy went like half the season without throwing a passing td

re: Bully Ball

Posted by Crimson97 on 12/3/24 at 9:47 am
Michigan won last year, and georgia the year before

re: Bully Ball

Posted by Crimson97 on 12/3/24 at 9:17 am
Reread my post.

re: Bully Ball

Posted by Crimson97 on 12/3/24 at 8:56 am
You aren't wrong at all, but I expect this to change with a more competent qb. When Alabama did have success this year it was often times due to big plays more so than long sustained drives.

Part of this is due to penalty issues also of course.

Bully Ball

Posted by Crimson97 on 12/3/24 at 8:48 am
Anybody else here a little concerned with the transition in terms of the style of play of Alabama football and its identity?

Worried we are going to end up like Ohio State (now) or Oregon teams of old that can be really explosive on offense at times but when they go up against physical teams they struggle on offense and defense as well.

It seems this started a couple of years ago, but Deboer just doesn't seem to emphasize physicality as part of the team identity (obviously im not in the locker room) and it appears to be getting even worse.

I also recognize that the increased parity means physically dominating the opponent won't be possible in the same way it was under Saban for all those years. Hopefully I am wrong, and its just a personnel issue right now.

re: Saturday didn't prove much

Posted by Crimson97 on 10/28/24 at 10:48 am
that Missouri team is going to lose more games. SC, Vandy, Ten. all better than that team we played Saturday.

A win is a win, team still needs to get a lot better.

re: Saturday didn't prove much

Posted by Crimson97 on 10/28/24 at 10:34 am
Thank you for putting it better than I could. The point I was trying to make is that this past week wasn't much different than the weeks before it. People are looking at outcome instead of looking at the process to that outcome.

Team needs to continue to keep their foot on the gas and have a sense of urgency to improve. They can beat anyone on any given day, and they can lose to just about anyone as well.

I get the vibe from this team that they are more focused on the results of the game then on winning each play (could be totally wrong on that).

re: Saturday didn't prove much

Posted by Crimson97 on 10/28/24 at 9:22 am
Eh, believe me I didn't want Dabo either, but it's not like there was a lot of obvious homerun candidates. Cignetti might have been in hindsight.

Saturday didn't prove much

Posted by Crimson97 on 10/28/24 at 9:09 am
Seeing a lot of people overreacting to Saturdays 34 - 0 win. Offense was sluggish, especially in the first half. Defense was solid but given Missouri was out their QB and leading rusher don't think we can take much from that.

In my opinion, the second half was more of Missouri quitting then Alabama really dominating them. I do think the defense played with more energy and confidence which was good to see.
quote:

would try to money whip Urban Myer first before even contemplating a list of employed coaches


Urban Meyer has too much baggage and has made an arse of himself too many times for Alabama to consider him. I would also bet he has no interest in riding Saban's "coat tails".
Norvell should be considered but only after Demeco and Sark (I know those two are very unlikely to be interested)