RanchoLaPuerto

1. Username of the suspended, with a link to the their public profile page ...this is important!

Judge Holden.

LINK

2. Estimated length of suspension

Over three years.

3. Is this their first suspension?

I think so.

4. What they did to get suspended? (please be specific and factual)

Criticized the admin’s management of a thread on Madison Brooks. I think the admin was TigerFred but am not sure.

From recollection, the admin threatened him with banning, and he replied. “Oblige me.”

I cannot emphasize enough how much he regrets this momentary loss of reason.

FWIW, others commented that he was generally a good poster in the thread, and his absence has been noted. He got carried away, an act for which he has been continuously contrite ever since

5. Have they been previously suspended for the reason indicated in No. 4?

No.

6. A pledge not to break any rule in the future

Before all that is good and holy, he promises to be a model poster and to never challenge an admin again. He has been out in the cold for a long time.

7. Lavish praise for the Admin team (limited to three sentences)

The admin team is righteous and just, bringing joy, light, and truth into the world.

That I have an exam today but didn’t study. Still have that dream.

quote:

---

remit $116,755

---

That's a quarterly for some.

DEFintely and problem.

quote:

---

Get a car wash membership and go through constantly

---

\
Two things.

I will be at hotels for days after traveling, and I often arrive pretty late.

Also, doen't constant car washign damage/swirl the clear coat?

quote:

---

Ceramic coating or keep it waxed to prevent them from sticking

---

Done that.

If you want to sell out to Skynet, go for it.

Seriously, that sounds like good money. But you can’t make a career out of it. They won’t need you in 2 years.

There’s a mess of companies out there spending more. You just need leaner overhead than the majors bring.

He seems to have been a

Clear and Present Danger

quote:

---

My question then is what would not mentioning the number five or the trophy have to do with anything that is actually in the letter?

---

It is the point. Lawyers sent the letter. LSU spun it as JD claiming the number five and the copy of the trophy. LSU looked innocent. JD looked like a spoiled child.

The larger point is this: you can’t be legally right but lose the fight. That is where legal judgment comes in.

People seem to think “the law” is some tablet set in stone. It’s actually what you can persuade people the tablet should contain. Wisdom matters.