profwilson
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 932 |
| Registered on: | 7/8/2004 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Who is CNNs Dana Oneill and why is she so butthurt about LSU?!?
Posted by profwilson on 3/27/26 at 11:50 am to TigerFan244
This is actually a line from the piece:
"[LSU] has made a history out of soaking itself in the stink of the bayou."
That gives away the game right there. The outsized, irrationally negative response to LSU's coaching hires definitely has a strong dimension of regional prejudice to it. If Lane Kiffin and Will Wade were coaching at Ohio State right now, I guarantee you we wouldn't be seeing anything like the same level of outrage and contempt.
"[LSU] has made a history out of soaking itself in the stink of the bayou."
That gives away the game right there. The outsized, irrationally negative response to LSU's coaching hires definitely has a strong dimension of regional prejudice to it. If Lane Kiffin and Will Wade were coaching at Ohio State right now, I guarantee you we wouldn't be seeing anything like the same level of outrage and contempt.
re: Warning for the athletic programs
Posted by profwilson on 3/27/26 at 11:46 am to AlecRock23
n/m
re: "Messy" and "Clumsy" hire
Posted by profwilson on 3/27/26 at 9:33 am to Sheriff Brackett
quote:
how this hire was "messy"
The Kiffin and Wade hires were "messy" for Ole Miss and N.C. State in the same way that Hiroshima was "messy" for the Japanese...
OK, perhaps an overstatement, but indulge me in a little hyperbole! :lol:
re: WW Return to LSU receiving national negativity
Posted by profwilson on 3/27/26 at 9:25 am to DustInTheWind
quote:
I’ll be honest, I wouldn’t know about any of the negativity unless it was posted here.
Well, here's just one pretty representative example from a prominent national source:
Athletic piece on LSU coaches
The reaction really is crazy and disproportionate. Will Wade is entitled to take another job, and coaches claiming that they are fully committed to their current gig right up until the moment they aren't isn't just common, it's the only thing they can reasonably do.
Now, I will say that I wouldn't love to be Wade's Athletic Director...
re: Time to celebrate Will Wade coming back with a TD Gear Giveaway...
Posted by profwilson on 3/26/26 at 10:20 pm to Chicken
All hail General Wade!
re: How excited are y’all 1-10?
Posted by profwilson on 3/26/26 at 12:57 pm to Kool Kaliper
quote:
Wade never won anything
Well, he won the SEC at LSU. And the SLC at McNeese. And multiple NCAA tournament games. But other than that, I guess you're right--he hasn't won anything.
re: Drop some sporting teams.,
Posted by profwilson on 3/20/26 at 3:45 pm to Ponchy Tiger
quote:
I would argue that it is bullshite because no public tax dollars are spent on athletics at LSU.
Well, you might argue that, but you would be wrong. If a university accepts federal funds at all (which LSU obviously does), then Title IX applies.
re: Please note how hard the WBC players
Posted by profwilson on 3/16/26 at 9:52 pm to chucknorris89
quote:
you want that cultural pride when building a team for LSU
I 100% guarantee you that whoever wins the College World Series this year (including if it is LSU) will not have a team that has a majority of players from its own state.
re: World classic baseball usa vs dom is a must see
Posted by profwilson on 3/15/26 at 10:12 pm to SOCAL TIGER
quote:
When did Austin Wells become Dominican?
Um, when he was born? His Mom is Dominican.
He's more Dominican than Pasquantino is Italian.
re: Slightly Nuanced Basketball Take
Posted by profwilson on 11/19/25 at 3:34 pm to Alt26
quote:
LSU is taking care of really bad competition
While this is largely true, it does look like UNO may be better than most of us thought. They won at TCU and romped at Tulane. LSU destroyed them. It's definitely the Tigers' best win so far.
re: Slightly Nuanced Basketball Take
Posted by profwilson on 11/19/25 at 1:34 pm to jlbasm
quote:
The team sucks. Everybody knows it.
This may turn out to be true, but certainly not "everybody" knows it. Multiple ESPN college basketball analysts (including Jay Bilas), for example, have LSU as an NCAA tournament bubble team. Now, these same guys have 10-13 SEC teams in the tourney, so that assessment is not inconsistent with LSU ending up in the bottom third of the league. Given how grueling the SEC gauntlet will be, it is imperative that the Tigers rack up wins in the non-conference. The neutral-site and road games between November 28th and December 13th (Texas Tech, Georgia Tech, SMU, etc.) are especially important. If they can go into conference play at 11-2 or better, they have a reasonable chance to make the Tournament. If they don't, I think everyone would agree that it's time to go in another direction from a coaching standpoint.
re: Eli Drinkwitz - PSA
Posted by profwilson on 11/12/25 at 12:59 pm to TigerLifer18
quote:
Saban, Kiffin, or death.
I guess we'll be having death, then...
re: Brian Kelly hate
Posted by profwilson on 10/13/25 at 6:42 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
watching the same exact football game the last 4 years
Really? You think the games this year look like "the same exact football game" as when Jayden Daniels was here, we had no defense, and were winning or losing 51-45? I swear, I think that some people who post on here live in an alternate football universe.
Now, to be clear, I don't think Kelly is above criticism. But to say that it's just "the same old thing" every year is just flat wrong. In fact, what is amazing is how we seem to have found a radically different formula for being good-but-not-great every year. I do think the expectation this year should be a playoff berth. It's still in play--we'll see if we get there.
re: Josh Pate GOES OFF on SEC officiating
Posted by profwilson on 9/22/25 at 2:46 pm to Hilonghorn9
quote:
we were actually allowed to listen in to the refs back and forth talk during plays that were being reviewed
You are exactly right. The ACC is way ahead of the rest of college football on this. It would be very helpful to have this kind of transparency, so that even if fans disagreed, they would know where the officials were coming from. It would help tamp down the conspiracy theories.
re: Go home, FPI. You’re drunk.
Posted by profwilson on 9/21/25 at 3:34 pm to OleVaught14
quote:
FPI is a power ranking on who would be favored on a neutral field
Yeah, except that it's not even that. Ole Miss is a 1-point favorite at home against LSU. This means that Vegas would favor LSU on a neutral field, even though the Tigers are 11 spots lower in FPI. At the end of 2019, AFTER the playoffs in which LSU had obliterated everyone in their path and completed arguably the best season in college football history, FPI still had LSU 3rd. That tells you a lot. But, to be clear, it doesn't reflect "ESPN bias," as there is no human judgment in it. It's just a flawed formula.
re: LSU opens as -1.5 favorite against Ole Miss.
Posted by profwilson on 9/21/25 at 12:34 pm to Arthur Bach
It's up to LSU +2.5 now. A lot of early money apparently coming in on Ole Miss. This doesn't surprise me that much--the betting public tends to be more impressed by offense than by defense.
re: Playoff projections
Posted by profwilson on 9/15/25 at 6:10 pm to TexasOnTop
USC is currently #25 in the AP poll and unranked in the coaches' poll, so they are marginal. Navy and NC State are the only other teams on their schedule even receiving votes, and they don't play a conference championship game. So yes, they could quite possibly "sort out their defense" as the season goes on, but how will we really know?
re: Playoff projections
Posted by profwilson on 9/15/25 at 4:43 pm to AwgustaDawg
The only realistically possible losses that I see on Notre Dame's remaining schedule are Arkansas and USC--and they'll be favored in both of those. They should be double-digit favorites in every other game.
re: Playoff projections
Posted by profwilson on 9/15/25 at 3:43 pm to Rex Feral
Notre Dame should be out of the conversation at this point. They have lost both of the games on their schedule against teams that will be ranked (though I suppose USC MIGHT end up as a ranked opponent), and they have no conference championship game. What could they possibly do against Purdue, Syracuse, Stanford, Pittsburgh, etc. to prove that they belong in the playoff? How could you let them in over, let's say, a 9-3 Texas A&M team?
Playoff projections
Posted by profwilson on 9/15/25 at 3:23 pm
From Pete Fiutak at College Football News (not who he WANTS to get in or thinks SHOULD get in, but his prediction of who DOES get in):
CFN playoff prediction
If this actually happens, a lot of people around here will lose their minds, and rightly so. 11-2 Iowa State, 10-2 Notre Dame, and 10-3 Georgia Tech would likely have ZERO ranked wins between them. If they get in over, hypothetically, 3-loss Oklahoma, Tennessee, Alabama, Texas, Missouri, and/or Ole Miss teams, look out...
CFN playoff prediction
If this actually happens, a lot of people around here will lose their minds, and rightly so. 11-2 Iowa State, 10-2 Notre Dame, and 10-3 Georgia Tech would likely have ZERO ranked wins between them. If they get in over, hypothetically, 3-loss Oklahoma, Tennessee, Alabama, Texas, Missouri, and/or Ole Miss teams, look out...
re: Florida Will Beat Miami and Texas
Posted by profwilson on 9/14/25 at 8:52 pm to theCAW
quote:
Miami will win by 30-35 points
If you really believe this and are right, you should be able to make a fortune on an alternate line bet. Miami is only a touchdown favorite (7.5) at the open.
Popular
1











