Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:3373
Registered on:7/23/2022
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
That's a tidy day at the office for sure. Sam is pulling seven figure paydays pretty regularly now, he'll break through with a big win soon.

re: Another US soldier killed

Posted by Hondo Blacksheep on 7/19/26 at 7:38 pm to
They are not highly paid, but they have great benefits, especially the rather shady though well earned disability program. I guess it is just another way of deferring compensation and annuitizing to make ends meet.
Glad you're happy. I have an interracial, inter generational partner half my age with no kids involved and we couldn't be happier. The heart wants what the heart wants.
Again, I concede I haven't seen it but will when it comes to tv. And if these obvious cultural misappropriations are your thing then by all means have at it.
No, you're right, I don't, I haven't seen the movie. I did read the originally translated Homer books twice, once in high school again as an adult.

My comment has to do with the obvious progressive staffing decisions for the main characters.

I mean, Helen is ugly and butch instead of soft and beautiful; Menelaus is small, comedic and young instead of the old bull warrior he is described; and Paris is a 100 pound trans instead of the warrior Hector's younger brother. It's off putting and unnecessary.

If you dig this kind of degraded misappropriation in the arts then by all means have at it. I just find all the obvious race/sex swaps tiresome at this point. That's no way to treat a classic.

What next, Shakespeare's titles but now - wait for it - Julius Caesar is a snarky black lesbian and Mark Anthony is the 100 pound trans?

frick all that ... if these film makers want to make a woke movie, then write a fricking woke story as the platform. Why make a mockery of a classic but for the progressive desire to tarnish everything we normies revere.
Thank you for explaining your point. My eyes are obviously not as keen as your own, so may I respectfully suggest you be clearer in your tease and link practices so we have at least some sense of what you're trying to say.

Cheers!
>> ... and serve as a highly adaptable platform for air superiority, homeland defense, and long-range strike missions <<<

Obviously, our next gen is always awesome to behold, and the craft itself looks incredible.

As for its best possible use, if they're really ready to roll then let's put it on Iran right now.

If not, then a homeland defense interceptor works for me too.
This movie is straight up cultural appropriation, intended by its makers to mock and diminish yet another classic.

Progressives so often lack the creativity and backing to do what they really want to do artistically, so they instead opt for unimaginatively tearing down classics.

It's a pathetic use of everyone's time and money. Just make your own progressive movie with an overt lefty plot and see how it does, rather than destroy a truly worthwhile work bc the film makers are so dull and unimaginative they literally can't write an original plot.

I'll watch it when it reaches my television but on its face this looks no better than the fem Ghostbusters, it just parasitically attached itself to a classic.
Yep. They are of a type.
I understand your artistic license argument, and totally get that all historical films do the same, but unattractive, oversized bad b Lupita as Helen; a diminutive and comedic Kevin Hart as Menelaus; and 100 pound transboy Elliott Page as Paris as the warrior who brings this battle on through his love for said bad b, is seriously bad casting and unlikely to satisfy anyone who has read the source material unless they are a fellow progressive.
No one on the right gives a frick about race. It's boring, repetitive, and only used so a few hustlers can gain wealth and influence.

In this case, however, both Homer and contemporary critics - Sappho and Euripides to name two - make clear that Helen was beautiful, fair skinned, with white arms, with light hair and eyes, so why but for the sake of moron wokeness would anyone cast it this way? This actress literally does not fit the playbill.

If you want to screw with the story to this extent, why not just grow some actual creativity and make a different movie?
I can't even ... this violates at least two of my "I'm not going to die this way if I can possibly avoid it" rules: deep water and tight spaces.

In the words of the philosopher kings Hall and Oates, I can't go for that.
I have not, I only watched the original trial from afar (I was working myself at the time) but my then-lady was glued to the news reports and dragged me into it OJ style, and from what I saw and heard he seemed guilty. The facts, evidence and frankly his utterly bizarre, dismissive behavior led me to believe so. Am always willing to consider actual new evidence though.
No idea, thanks for the clarification.
Agreed in large part. It does appear, however, that Marco Rubio and now deceased Sen Graham have not been on the take when they could have been.

Unfortunately, all of the prominent Dems appear to have been the inside-trading, lying, money-grubbing whores we have all long suspected.

ETA: and so have most Republicans, to their great shame
I'm a big fan of the Innocence Project. I can barely imagine the abject fear and frustration of being falsely imprisoned.

But ... I also believe Scott killed his pregnant wife and dumped her body, including his unborn child, into the water, so in the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, he's going to have to do the time.
When, like the Dave's example, it is merely the singular possessive of a proper noun.