McMahonnequin

quote:

---

- how many years before you place any accountability on McMahon for losing?

- what is the standard for success under McMahon?

---

Completely silent after a win.

Typical

quote:

---

Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others

---

It's not a slam dunk man. Obviously we don't have all the facts, but if the act took place in a private office behind a closed door, then perhaps a "reasonable person would (not) know that the act would be seen by others." It's way more nuanced than you make it out to be

quote:

---

Because the SEC wants the home team to win. Pretty simple.

---

I could understand this if you said they want certain teams to win, but what does the SEC stand to gain from a home team instead of a visiting team winning any given game?

quote:

---

You didn’t disprove anything I posted. I clearly stated that “every once in a blue moon we run post ups for Baker” so your attempt to say that one possession equals an entire game is not only stupid, it doesn’t refute anything I posted.

---

They ran it again at the 17:00 minute mark. But every 3 minutes is once in a blue moon to you I guess

quote:

---

We don’t run anything on offense

---

I see you keep saying this in multiple threads, but I think it's a little disingenuous. I agree LSU does not run very many sets or "plays" but there is certainly a motion offense being ran. But there still are some plays being used. For example, off the opening tip, LSU went straight into a double pin down with a seal from Baker on the block. Executed pretty well and Baker got decent positioning, he's just not very good at putting the ball in the hole.

quote:

---

I remember Wade losing at home to Oats by 30

---

John Petty looked like prime Steph Curry that night

quote:

---

Who’s making excuses? You’re not very good at interpreting.

---

You don't know the guy, yet here you are saying that he has a problem and needs help. That sounds like an excuse to me, or at the very least is a weak attempt to coddle someone who was afforded more opportunity than the average person could dream of

quote:

---

After watching Dean make a pathetic effort for the crucial rebound late, I expected to see threads playing him less, not more.

---

I wouldn't exactly categorize that as pathetic effort. He found a man, put a body on him, and just got out athleted

quote:

---

You can’t bench Baker because the spacing his shooting provides is essential to the ball screen offense we run

---

He doesn't provide any spacing at all. Dude literally has one made 3 in SEC play and opposing teams have smartly started to let him shoot it if he so pleases. I seriously don't see a single advantage in playing baker significant minutes unless the opposition's 5 is severely undersized

It's mostly due to the fact that about 98% of posters on this board are basketball illiterate. Both in the sense of how the actual game works, as well as the inner workings of college basketball as a whole