Favorite team:Georgia 
Location:Athens, GA
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:11594
Registered on:11/18/2007
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Congrats SEC bros

Posted by S1C EM on 12/8/24 at 7:49 am
quote:

We whooped your arse the first half of the game and only lost to ourselves.


Was that your takeaway? Because I’d say your prolific offense only managing 6 points in the half against a defense that is but a shell of our more recent GREAT ones says otherwise.




Take that L, bitch.
quote:

Nah, Dallas still kicking. Just old as hell lol


Ah, yeah. I misread your context. I see it now. I knew he was old as dirt, so my first reaction was "he dead?!?" :lol:

quote:

Yeah, where you been man?


I'm around. I still check in from time to time, though I have not been a regular on the boards since the first of the year. Decided to cut a bunch of distractions out of my day and this is just one of those things I felt was taking up too much time. It's been a good thing for the most part, but I still come around when there's news breaking to see what all the gossip is on it. Colbie Young's disposition was the catalyst today.

Wait....Dallas is gone? AND Meansonny? Damn.....

I guess I've been gone a while myself.

re: Low testosterone question.

Posted by S1C EM on 6/30/24 at 7:18 am
quote:

Go to an endocrinologist and not a urologist. I had similar issues. My problem was in my adrenal gland and not my testicles. Started taking clomiphene and within 6 months my testosterone levels were back up in the 600s.


What, exactly, did you ask your endocrinologist to check? I already have one for managing a thyroid disorder. Figured out with recent bloodwork that my testosterone could use a boost as it was sitting at 261.

I’m in good health, not overweight, don’t smoke, don’t drink, sexual desire has never been a problem and getting it up never has been, either. Considering TRT, but the side effects concern me. I just don’t see a “natural” route here given that there isn’t a lot of change to make lifestyle-wise. And from what I’ve read, all of those things you can do account for small gains. Nothing significant.
quote:

we also have the benefit of hindsight now, something no one had in the beginning.

Idiot


So you wish to argue that now that something is over, we don't have a better view of the mistakes and overreaches made during the period when it was an active situation? Going for the "I told you so" angle on something that was a fluid situation for months? You predicted the future from your armchair. That's cool.
quote:

bullshite.


Explain how I'm incorrect. There were basically two sides to most arguments around Covid: This or that would work or it wouldn't. Some people were going to be wrong.

quote:

Well, education and rationality would have eliminated that panic early on. But the uneducated, easily panicked sheep had the ear of government and media officials.


The average person in this country is very poorly educated, and most of them are incapable of educating themselves, especially where science is concerned. Reading random Facebook posts and articles from fringe media outlets is not the same as educating one's self. Both sides of the argument had PLENTY of uneducated morons parroting their beliefs and theories as absolute fact throughout (and it's clearly still happening).

quote:

No, not many hoarded anything and, as you seem to conveniently forget, that the board was filled with posts stating the irrational behavior and "guidance" being published by the COV-19 lunatics.


This turn didn't happen until a couple of months in. In December 2019 and going into the new year, it was totally different. And if you don't think people were hoarding en masse, you didn't try buying groceries during the early months of the pandemic. The realization that few people ever washed their hands on a regular basis prior to Covid was disturbing.
quote:

That’s cause it was NEVER a novel virus, it was a synthesized, genetically engineered virus. The health “professionals” were out there chasing their own tails and pontificating as if they were the alpha & omega. When in reality their superiors knew exactly what this was and still abetted the lie that it was zoonotic.



I said from day one it was engineered. All of the signs pointed to that fact. That does not make it any less "novel" and unknown to the immune system of every person on the planet at the time it got out.
quote:

From the beginning of this the government left no room for discussion from any healthcare scientist that went even slightly against the grain of what the CDC spit out and a lot of what they did put out was utter nonsense and garbage science. Especially to people working in labs who knew enough to know what was ridiculous. Covid, especially the first two strains, did kill a lot of
folks. The majority of whom had a co-morbidity known or unknown to them at the time they got sick. There are other viruses that do the same. There have been some admissions of overreaction by a few . But the “what else could we have done” argument is weak when you consider the lack of scientific debate allowed at the beginning of the nightmare and the use of the disease for political advantage.


Not in disagreement with you. My wife works in healthcare also, so I saw a lot from her perspective. But I still think what we witnessed in the early phase was a reaction to what we could confirm was happening in real-time and a lack of any real plan to curb it conceived before it hit.

It was a clusterfrick of thought among officials trying to find SOMETHING they could say that would quell the mass panic taking place and prevent total anarchy. I think they saw that as a legitimate potential outcome and we know that doesn't fly. So issuing all of their guidance was them doing something in their minds. I think we can all agree that most of it was unhelpful (some of it downright ludicrous), but I don't think they felt there was adequate time to entertain a debate as things were transpiring. They started with the most restrictive measures they could and decided it best to loosen those as they figured out more along the way. I'm not saying it was the right way to handle it. I just think there would be criticism regardless of which way they opted to go with it.
quote:

You are absolutely correct. But two things can be right . The shutdowns, distancing , masking, mandatory vaccinations and large scale denial of basic rights were a huge government overspend


You are certainly correct. But we also have the benefit of hindsight now, something no one had in the beginning. So given all of the panic over what people were seeing in the first few months, what would you have them do? It's an honest question.

I'm pretty sure everybody on this board was guilty of hoarding toilet paper right off the bat, so there was a level of hysteria that had taken everyone for a ride. This board was littered with horror stories in the early days. It's like everyone conveniently forgot.
quote:

Wild. So we should treat it like other respiratory infections? Not like it’s the plague? What a crazy thought. fricking idiots


So you're not clear on the difference between a "novel" pathogen and one that is no longer......."novel?" Got it.
quote:

I’m sure I’ll catch all manner of hell for sharing my opinion here abt this- but the current COVID strains aren’t nearly as bad as the initial strains.

So imho- it makes sense to update the guidelines.

signed- someone who worked covid ICU all through the pandemic



Don't try to bring logic up in here. You're gonna ruin the circle jerk! :lol:
quote:

How about providing a little more information as to why a carnivore diet is not healthy other than your feelings.


Seeing as how it prioritizes high-fat, high-cholesterol foods and omits a number of key nutrients found in fruits, vegetables, etc., it's not difficult math. Just because it can help reduce weight doesn't make it "healthy."

And I'll give you one of many articles you could locate yourself explaining all of this.
quote:

Been on a Carnivore diet since June 2023 and haven't eaten bread, cereal, pasta, sugar in over 7 months.


That doesn't sound as healthy as you may think it does.
quote:

Like talking to a wall


If only you could grasp the irony of your statement.
quote:

I wouldn't be surprised if Swift has done some stuff like that in the past (I just don't know).


So because you’re not aware of it, you choose to have a negative view? What other big names have taken notice of this tragedy? If it’s the same as you giving $10, then go give your $10. This is what’s wrong with people. Nothing is ever “enough.”
quote:

According to Urban Dictionary the rule of “Four Sixes” states that single women are looking for these four things to find a perfect male partner:

- At least 6 feet tall
- Has a 6 pack (abs)
- Earns a 6-figure salary
- Has a six inch peen



Well, good luck to all those single bitches as they remain perpetually single.

re: Buying a New Car Out of State

Posted by S1C EM on 2/12/24 at 12:57 pm
quote:

I am guessing I would be paying tax twice - - once at purchase is foreign state and once in Louisiana upon registering vehicle. Is that how this works? IF so, what is the process?


They will get the location of where you intend to register the vehicle, and you'll be charged the tax for that locale. You don't pay twice.

re: Hydrogen Vehicles

Posted by S1C EM on 2/12/24 at 12:39 pm
quote:

What? Is this a serious question? EVs are a disaster in so many ways.


Yeah, uh.....nah. They flat-out work incredibly well for commuter applications and the tech is getting better by the day. I'm sorry that your commitment to a particular political ideology requires that you spout this nonsense repeatedly.

quote:

That fad will die until something other than mined lithium is used for storage.


Yeah, again.....nah. You may WANT it to, but it's not. We may well get past lithium at some point, but like any fossil fuel before it, lithium will be around to bridge that gap between technologies. Some automakers whose bottom line is less staked in EVs will back off and get a little more conservative with their rollouts, but EVs as a whole aren't going anywhere.

re: Hydrogen Vehicles

Posted by S1C EM on 2/12/24 at 11:41 am
quote:

I don't think we'll see wide spread hydrogen passenger vehicles in 20 years. There are too many hurdles to overcome to build out the infrastructure.


Refueling stations alone will prevent hydrogen from ever being viable for private, commuter vehicles. Given how people already complain about EV chargers and the lack (but growing number) of places to charge, I'm not sure how people think we're going to suddenly pop up hydrogen stations in the numbers that would be needed. And the lack of home refueling as an option puts it behind EVs. Not sure why people are so hellbent on getting around EVs to the point that this is what they come up with.