CharlesUFarley
| Favorite team: | Auburn |
| Location: | Daphne, AL |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | Drives and PLC Guy (Mechanical Engineer) |
| Number of Posts: | 1096 |
| Registered on: | 1/13/2022 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Pork Loin Cook Help
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 5/13/26 at 9:48 am to DaFreakinFarmer
quote:
Sous vide pork loin at 130 degrees for 3-4 hrs then seared on a hot arse flame or skillet is a damn fine medium rare piece of meat
Not to nitpick, but he said 9 LB loins, probably needs more than 4 hours and 130 degrees is a temp a lot of sources say not to got over 2 hours with, but many say 131 is good to go. No disputing your results though, just read up. Someone out there probably has a calc app for this.
re: I've really gotten into baking lately
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 5/12/26 at 7:46 am to NatalbanyTigerFan
LINK
Read this sometime. It'll give you some ideas. I tried some of his variations and have come to a different conclusion, but the research is ongoing, I just only do it around holidays.
Read this sometime. It'll give you some ideas. I tried some of his variations and have come to a different conclusion, but the research is ongoing, I just only do it around holidays.
re: Roth conversion strategy &:taxes
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 5/11/26 at 2:35 pm to TorchtheFlyingTiger
You might want to google "safe harbor" tax payment rules. If you will have paid an amount greater than 110% (I think) of your total 2025 taxes by Dec. 26, then you won't owe any penalties and can wait until April 15th to pay those taxes. The first part of the year is usually stronger for the market. If you are still working, you can increase your withholding to meet the Safe Harbor amount. Also, tax loss harvesting if you have any losers you want to sell.
re: Retiring at 50 with $2MM in savings
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 5/11/26 at 2:24 pm to Sho Nuff
I prefer the Morningstar approach to buckets with a two year short term bucket that is all cash, an intermediate term bucket that is bonds and some stocks if you want, then long term that is all stocks. The way to present it is that you always keep all three buckets and keep refilling the short term bucket from the other two, so always keep two years of cash in the short term bucket.
Another huge thing that gets overlooked is asset allocation. If you buy one or two big index funds, you can't choose where you are getting your money from when you have to sell some of the fund, it is going to predominately come from mega cap stocks, whether they are up or down. If you invest in multiple funds of different market caps and stock styles, you at least have a choice.
Another huge thing that gets overlooked is asset allocation. If you buy one or two big index funds, you can't choose where you are getting your money from when you have to sell some of the fund, it is going to predominately come from mega cap stocks, whether they are up or down. If you invest in multiple funds of different market caps and stock styles, you at least have a choice.
re: Retiring at 50 with $2MM in savings
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 5/11/26 at 1:17 pm to notsince98
quote:
What are the biggest flaws with this analysis from Erin?
No tax treatment. No consideration of the source of withdrawals: taxable accounts or tax sheltered or Roth. She talks about real return but not after tax return.
$950K in a short term bucket that is taxable has to beat inflation and taxes.
When Social Security hits, you can get a higher after tax income with a lower draw down rate because not all SS is taxed. State income taxes also are also a factor, because most states don't tax SS, some don't tax IRA's, some do.
re: Who was the MOST fiscally conservative POTUS in your lifetime?
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 5/10/26 at 9:44 pm to CrystalPreserves
quote:
The top 1% of the wealthiest wage earners pay zero tax.
Wealthiest wage earners?
The highest wage earners pay a lot in taxes. The wealthiest people typically have almost zero earned income, and get their income through investments, which is called unearned income.
Wages are earned income.
Wealth is different than income.
What was your point?
re: So I'm convinced that I need to get away from AUM. Now what?
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 5/9/26 at 10:53 am to SuperFanDan
quote:
Hopefully, he hasn't locked me into EJ with golden handcuff type investments that will tax me heavily if I try to transfer to another investment management company.
It sounds like you really don't know what you're invested in. Before you make any changes, why don't you find out what you have, including all applicable fees, including contingent fees that would apply for selling shares, then decide if you can do better.
You should be able to transfer the shares to another broker without creating a taxable event, then maybe move out of them slowly over time with a definite plan including taking the taxes into account.
From what I hear, Edward Jones promotes American Funds, and some of those are best in class. You don't want to pay high fees to get them, but it might not be a good idea to sell them just to change and have to pay a lot of taxes.
re: Just came back from China. Our auto industry is doomed.
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 5/9/26 at 9:34 am to fareplay
We tried Government Motors during the Obama years.
re: Retired folks - Making the adjustment to freedom
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 5/8/26 at 12:31 pm to TigerBR1111
Did it. Went back to work after 4 years.
Get on a good, consistent sleep cycle where you wake up with naturally with the sunrise every morning. Did wonders for me.
Get on a good, consistent sleep cycle where you wake up with naturally with the sunrise every morning. Did wonders for me.
re: Drunk or not? Four drinks, four hours
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 5/8/26 at 12:28 pm to theballguy
OP said typical light beers. Those are closer to 3.5% alcohol. Some are 4%. 20-30% less alcohol.
200 pounder shouldn't even feel that.
200 pounder shouldn't even feel that.
re: It is the absolute right of the state to supervise the formation of public opinion.
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 5/6/26 at 6:25 pm to Timeoday
It's funny to me that Dan Rather's name never comes up in these conversations.
re: Republicans haven’t lived up to the expectations that Obama has for them
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 5/6/26 at 10:08 am to stout
quote:
"the rule of law"
Operation Fast and Furious.
Operation Cross Fire Hurricane.
re: Trump & Iran
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 5/4/26 at 8:54 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
There is no possible course of action that would prevent this from being an “over and over” again situation.
I hear you, but some people probably said that about Japan in WW2.
Over and over again isn't new, we've been living in it since 1979.
re: Trump & Iran
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 5/4/26 at 8:45 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
No one anywhere thinks we’re going to start bombing civilians or consistently target civilian infrastructure.
I wasn't advocating an attack on civilians. I was thinking more along the lines that electricity and water and food and other essentials will soon be gone, and civilians will react to the realities they face.
Maybe they already have and thousands have been executed, and they are all just in survival mode now. I hear the stories, but what is really the truth?
Personally, I don't think there can be a negotiated peace with the regime. I think extermination is our only option. Otherwise, this just comes up again, and again, and again....
Edit: just to clarify, I don't mean extermination of the people, just all the bad elements who have been running the country.
re: Trump & Iran
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 5/4/26 at 8:37 pm to demtigers73
quote:
Problem is they will never surrender. They will let everyone die before they surrender.
But when those people realize they are going to die, they will turn on the people who won't surrender.
I hope that the military has a plan for another round of kinetic operations that will change some thinking over there. I would make the next phase the eradication of the IRGC. That is the enforcement arm. I am sure it is already diminished, but now we should set our phasers on "exterminate".
re: Do you velvet your meat when you do a stir fry?
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 5/4/26 at 6:07 pm to Napoleon
I've heard a maximum of twenty minutes for baking soda then rinse it off. I get good results that way.
re: Was the Civil War Fought Because of Slavery? It Depends on Which Side You View
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 5/4/26 at 2:01 pm to RFK
History is written by the winners.
The main source of revenue for the Federal government were tariffs paid by businesses in the South. Lincoln wanted to raise those to pay for infrastructure improvements in the North that would strengthen the Industrial Base then to force the South to do business with the North, all the while criticizing slave holders to get votes.
It's important to remember that what we consider to be our rights are largely derived from English Common Law, among which was the right to own slaves. They were considered to be the rights that people expected when the country was founded. That is why the Constitution doesn't list them. It does, however, acknowledge the existence of legal slaves.
Just like the Dems today court the Squad, Lincoln courted the Abolitionists but in secret he had big plans for the revenue the slave economy generated, and he invaded because the Southern States stopped paying the bills. His Generals told him the war would be over in weeks.
The South Carolina militia fired on Fort Sumpter. In response, Lincoln invaded Virginia.
All the slave talk and all that history has recorded since then was crafted to support a narrative.
The main source of revenue for the Federal government were tariffs paid by businesses in the South. Lincoln wanted to raise those to pay for infrastructure improvements in the North that would strengthen the Industrial Base then to force the South to do business with the North, all the while criticizing slave holders to get votes.
It's important to remember that what we consider to be our rights are largely derived from English Common Law, among which was the right to own slaves. They were considered to be the rights that people expected when the country was founded. That is why the Constitution doesn't list them. It does, however, acknowledge the existence of legal slaves.
Just like the Dems today court the Squad, Lincoln courted the Abolitionists but in secret he had big plans for the revenue the slave economy generated, and he invaded because the Southern States stopped paying the bills. His Generals told him the war would be over in weeks.
The South Carolina militia fired on Fort Sumpter. In response, Lincoln invaded Virginia.
All the slave talk and all that history has recorded since then was crafted to support a narrative.
re: Trump IRA
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 4/30/26 at 9:39 pm to Kjnstkmn
You all are showing how little you know your recent history.
The "Saver's Credit", a tax credit of up to $1000, was made into law during the Bush years. Low income Americans who save for retirement are eligible for a 50% refundable tax credit up to $1000 on money they contribute to a retirement plan.
Barack Obama tried to do the "MyRA", a streamlined way for people to save for retirement who had no other way. It withered and died and was eliminated quietly.
I seriously doubt many people actually do these plans.
They are an effort to get people to save for retirement.
None of this is new. The question is will anyone who is eligible take advantage of it?
Probably not.
The "Saver's Credit", a tax credit of up to $1000, was made into law during the Bush years. Low income Americans who save for retirement are eligible for a 50% refundable tax credit up to $1000 on money they contribute to a retirement plan.
Barack Obama tried to do the "MyRA", a streamlined way for people to save for retirement who had no other way. It withered and died and was eliminated quietly.
I seriously doubt many people actually do these plans.
They are an effort to get people to save for retirement.
None of this is new. The question is will anyone who is eligible take advantage of it?
Probably not.
re: Americans were promised the Hart-Celler Act wouldn't significantly alter US demographics
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 4/29/26 at 9:12 pm to PuertoRicanBlaze
If you jump in the wayback machine a few more times, I think you'll find that FDR claimed that Social Security would never be more than 3% of the Federal Budget and that Woodrow Wilson claimed that only the very wealthiest Americans will ever pay income taxes.
And let's not forget: "If you like your plan, you can keep your plan. Period. End of Discussion."
And let's not forget: "If you like your plan, you can keep your plan. Period. End of Discussion."
re: Why won't Iran just agree to the terms of surrender?
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 4/29/26 at 11:16 am to AUveritas
You don't understand the culture. I don't either, but I do know that in that culture they will fall on their face in your presence and beg for mercy, and if you give it to them, when you leave, they will claim to be the last man standing and to have won, and all their countrymen will agree. They don't experience shame and defeat the way we do.
re: Political "Cooldown" in the coming years after Trump
Posted by CharlesUFarley on 4/28/26 at 11:16 pm to junkfunky
“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.”
- Barack Obama
The dems have been ramping up the hate and violent talk at least since W beat Gore. The difference is that W wanted everyone to like him so he never fought back, but Trump faces their stuff head on and doubles down to get what he wants.
I think it will be even worse when Trump is gone because we will be back to the kinds of Republicans who never fight back.
- Barack Obama
The dems have been ramping up the hate and violent talk at least since W beat Gore. The difference is that W wanted everyone to like him so he never fought back, but Trump faces their stuff head on and doubles down to get what he wants.
I think it will be even worse when Trump is gone because we will be back to the kinds of Republicans who never fight back.
Popular
1












