Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:4495
Registered on:12/8/2021
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Definitely looks like internal problems with the program under Beth!


It feels more like a sign that LSU has de-funded the program. It’s still a reflection on Torina that she couldn’t justify greater investment in the program.
quote:

ETA: Which means that Brown's best move is to go pro now. More is made of "leverage" than probably should be. No one is going to give him $1MM next year.


If someone might give him $1M this year, why would no one do so next year? With 5 years of eligibility, the situation next year would be exactly the same. He has to decide if he thinks he can stay healthy and put up bigger numbers.
quote:

Money talks now


Something Tennessee supposedly isn’t committing as much to baseball as other programs, which is why Vitello left.
I do wonder how much Rizy and Noot hitting the portal has to do with them not producing enough to justify the revenue sharing/NIL dollars they got this year and not being willing to take whatever pay cut Johnson was offering them to stay. They both might have potential, but I think one of the lessons from this season for LSU is that they need to focus resources on players who have already proven they can perform at this level.
One hole left. Need a bogey to finish +3 and #15 alone. Double bogey throws them into a tie. Not sure of the tiebreakers.
quote:

LSU needs a combined total of +1 or better on those 3 holes to advance


I think they just need +2 to stay at #15 without ties. I don’t know what the tiebreakers would be if they go +3 and tie Pepperdine.
quote:

If I’m reading things right we need a net three birdies to get to one under and tie for eighth.


There are two cuts. The field is cut to 15 teams after Round 3, then to 8 after Round 4 to advance to match play. They just need to stay at +3 or better (or win the tiebreaker at +4) to survive to Round 4.

re: If Milam goes

Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 5/1/26 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

As for Curiel, there’s not as much risk if he did since he wouldn’t be giving up leverage being a draftable sophomore. I don’t think Curiel stays either, but it’s a viable option for him if he wanted to for his own reasons.


If the 5 year eligibility rule passes as expected, Milam wouldn’t be giving up leverage either. I think it will just depend if a team hits their number for both players. Here’s hoping both want more money than the market will bear.
quote:

Moore is a junior; he can come back regardless of redshirt status. He will lose leverage, though. Jay did mention they would seek a redshirt for Moore. If he gets the redshirt, he would maintain leverage, and I would expect him back.


If the 5 years to play 5 eligibility rule passes, then redshirts won’t be a thing anymore, but all 3rd year Juniors like Moore would have leverage.
I don’t think 13-17 is enough with a weekend series loss to Sacramento St. and multiple midweek losses. Maybe 14-16 with a run in the conference tournament would put them over the top, but more likely they will need to earn the auto bid.
quote:

Would make sense why they do well in the tournaments that are just individual and not so much when it’s only counted towards the team


The SEC tournament isn’t scored any differently than any other tournament during the regular season. There isn’t any difference in individual vs team incentives.
quote:

Put WBB in the “rest of the sports” rev share allocation and give Jay 10%.


And be prepared to be sued for Title IX violations.
quote:

Seems like it may mean something until a court intervenes.


The problem in this case is that courts have already intervened. He cannot undo court rulings by Executive Order. The one-time transfer rule was invalidated by court rulings. It will take Congressional legislation, not EO, to re-instate it. Court rulings have already allowed extra years of eligibility for players like Pavia and Chambliss. Again, it will take legislation, not EO to supersede those rulings.

re: Braun for Yorke

Posted by MikeTheTiger71 on 3/30/26 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

What do you think is more likely to get you to first base with no one on, a strikeout or groundball to the left side?


Yes, lower strikeout totals tend to improve BA, but the question is what is the tradeoff to cut down on Ks. If you walk less because you are swinging early in the count and that happens to lower your strikeouts, that’s not necessarily a good tradeoff. If you produce less power because you’re trying to make contact, that’s not necessarily a good tradeoff. Sure, there are situations where avoiding a strikeout is more important than other considerations, but by and large, OPS is the most important measure of a hitters’ worth. Often maximizing walks and power to maximize OPS leads to higher strikeout totals, which is absolutely a good tradeoff. If a player has a poor OPS, that’s when you look to see if strikeouts are part of the reason. In that case, adjustments to cut down Ks might be warranted.
quote:

All these are available: Noot (my guess to start) Cooper Williams Sheerin, Guidry, Garcia, Fontenot Doesn't that look like a group that should be enough for a Sunday game?


It also looks like a group capable of holding a 5 run lead for 4 innings.
quote:

The move was the right one. If that lead gets blown then you are sitting here asking why they didn’t go to Cowan


If they NEVER went to Cowan, I would agree, but that’s not what I was suggesting. I was suggesting bringing him in if they gave up another runner or two to shut down the rally at that point.
quote:

Well you answered your own question


They were two batters away from the tying run even coming to the plate. It wasn’t high leverage. Yes, he should have been ready to go if they allowed another base runner or two, but they should have gone to one of the other guys they are planning to use situationally today. Now, if the belief is Cowan is the only remaining pitcher they can trust, then by all means get the one win, but if that’s the best they can hope for, then this season is lost anyway. They can’t keep losing series, especially at home.
quote:

Because you secure the W


He maximized the chances of getting one win at the cost of the chances of winning the series. There is absolutely no question that their chances of winning today are significantly worse without having Cowan available. Again, I never suggested he not have Cowan available yesterday if a high leverage situation arose, but if the rest of the staff couldn’t hold Kentucky to 6 runs in 3.1 IP, how are they going to pitch well enough to win today?
quote:

Jay said he considered it but simply had to get the W today. Some things will work, some won't but you can rest assured that Jay analyzes the options backwards and forwards


Oh, I absolutely agree he analyzing everything to the nth degree. Nothing in what I have said should be construed as thinking Johnson isn’t the best coach in college baseball right now. I get the rationale for wanting to ensure the victory today and if this were a one-off I wouldn’t have commented. It’s what he does more often than not sticking to a predetermined game plan and not adjusting for the circumstances. We’ll see if they have enough pitching tomorrow or can outscore them. I’d feel better if they had Cowan available.
quote:

Your Thread Title quote:Unpopular opinion - Wade GOOD but not ELITE


This is NOT my thread. No wonder you’ve been coming after me so hard. I’m not sure where you got the idea I started this topic.
quote:

Bruh we talking about a national championship coach. I trust he knows what hes doing. I'm sure he has a plan


I know he had a plan and it was a good plan knowing Schmidt wasn’t going to go the distance to have another guy like Cowan who could take it 3-4 innings after him. My issue isn’t with the lack of planning. It’s with the rigidity with which Johnson tends to stick to his plans regardless of game circumstances. I’m not questioning his competence from a big picture perspective nor do I question his ability to prepare his team for postseason. I just think sometimes he gives games away in the regular season that aren’t entirely necessary to achieve postseason success.

LSU didn’t need a shutout today. If the same pitchers they are going to have to rely on to get them 9 IP tomorrow couldn’t have given them 3.1 IP with 6 or fewer runs today, then they are in trouble. Cowan pitching 3-5 innings of shutout ball tomorrow likely has more impact than it did today. He should have been ready to go today if things got tight, but there was no reason not to try to get innings out of guys they are going to have to use anyway with a 5 run lead and especially when they extended to 7.