Favorite team:Texas A&M 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:322
Registered on:8/15/2021
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
I don’t often root for other teams, and didn’t even watch the game, but nice win. For the sake of the game I hope y’all hold on to coach drink for a good while. Love seeing a “blue blood” get KO’d by an underdog on the big stage. Almost blanked them too
Congratulations. You’ve done more with less. We’ve done less with more. I imagine you feel as proud as we feel disgusted. Such is life
Well…doesn’t look good. But they didn’t ask me, and if they had, I wouldn’t have had a suggestion. See what happens I guess.
quote:

No I’m sure you’re right, it’s only us assholes online


Yeah…that what I said.
You clearly have watched about as many A&M games as I have watched longhorn games in the last 20 years, which for me, were the 4 that happened when I was a student. Trolling is fine but at least act like you’re able to recall any rational characteristics of the teams you’re focusing on. Any football fan with half a brain can acknowledge the differences in our teams of the last 5 years, as opposed to the previous three coaching tenures
Without reading the original post and responding to the question at face value, while ignoring the childish drivel in the comments, A&M has suffered from a multitude of problems. We have hired great coaches, but failed to keep them for a number of reasons. Either more prestigious programs come calling, or they get caught up in scandal (perhaps due to administrative pressure or just bad decision making). There have been some bust hires as well, but that can be said of any program, even Alabama and Ohio state.

We didn’t keep up with the arms race in facilities in the 80’s, 90’s and early 2000’s especially, which cost us heavily.

Once the money really started flowing, the people who were giving a lot of it were allowed to influence decision making too heavily I would surmise, which they should have been kept out of. Tough to do to your bankroll I guess. But such is the culture of ultra conservative baby boomer oil billionaires. They don’t like to be left out. So if there’s a culture problem, it lies with the donors. Not the student body.

Fisher did a good job of instilling a “just another game. Just another opponent, 1-0 each week” philosophy. Better than any other coach in my time. Gone were the big blowout losses after a big win, frequent hangovers, and generally volatile performance differences from week to week. He created a degree of consistency we haven’t seen in decades. I hope that continues.

I refuse to believe recruits care at all about student body traditions, or the corps. I realize this website and a lot of media and advertising like to kind of highlight that part of the university, but it is minuscule in comparison to the overall student body population. Players are unlikely to ever encounter or experience much of anything related to it. That stuff is just what idiots online like to make fun of.

Recruits are more concerned with getting paid (now), is the coach going to put them into the best position to get into the NFL (maximizing play time, improving and showing off their skill set), and (if they’re smart) getting a good education. If their concern is the night life or pulling wool, they’ll likely be a liability in short order anyway.
We will undoubtedly lose to them next year and probably begin another long losing streak to them. Overall win percentage puts us comfortably in the bottom half of the conference. That is an objective fact. And the whole “military school” argument of the first 70+ years of the program are a poor excuse.

It was during that period we were recognized national champions, and the service academies and Ivy League schools managed to dominate in certain years during those times as well. What’s our excuse?

We have been a poorly run program using the good ol boy philosophy with boosters pulling all the strings. Hope it turns around but it’s reasonable to assume it won’t. I look forward to the next occasional uncharacteristically good season (by our standards) like 2012 and 2020 were. As a fan and alum they’re fun to watch. My expectations are tempered and I have no delusions of grandeur
Long time ago but John David Crow won the heisman for A&M back in ‘57. Counts. Make it 2
Just to opt out of wherever they end up at
Petrino was a fall guy and everyone knew it from his opening interview this summer and when the same vanilla offense marched out onto the field every week. It’s not anyone’s way but Jimbo’s. Petrino took a paycheck to buy Jimbo another year. It worked.

re: Elko is a good hire

Posted by Flying DeLorean on 11/29/23 at 3:01 pm
quote:

Put it this way, if Elko never coached at A&M, would he have been offered the job?


This is the first truly intriguing take on the hire. Does make you wonder, genuinely.

Everyone should really stop comparing him to any other coach. You are absolutely on point that his sample size is too small to make predictions and comparisons. Nobody knows how he will do with the resources he will be provided. Good or bad. This is as much of a wait and see scenario as we have seen in recent past with a coaching hire.

His time here was absolutely impactful in the hire. How could it not be. From his preexisting professional relationship with Robinson, his influence on the current roster, and the rest of the people in the program who worked with him and respect him, you can’t deny the influence of his history here.

Would he still have gotten the nod? Maybe. His time here definitely mattered though
All the alters, minors, troglodytes, and extra-chromosome-sporting posters on here will have a field day with this…but honestly, it is a perfectly reasonable and competitively written contract that I’d expect to see at any notable power 5 school who could afford it and wants to be competitive. It has a great base rate and heavy incentives. I see nothing wrong with it and if any of your schools posted such an agreement, I’d say exactly the same.
None of these mouth breathers care to consider rational and reasonable points. Solid analysis on your part though. I agree.

re: Elko>Stoops

Posted by Flying DeLorean on 11/26/23 at 7:21 pm
Elko is newer than Stoops. It’s anyone’s guess as to if he will end up being better. I won’t make any predictions. All I can do is watch. Stoops has been a head coach for many years now. Elko is still green.

Either stoops is a late bloomer, or he has peaked a couple years ago and what you’re seeing now is what you’ll see infinitum.

Elko is still an unknown. Perhaps his peak will mirror Stoops, perhaps it’ll mirror Smart’s. Or maybe Mike Gundy? Who knows. Can’t say he’s better, worst, or equal though. Just because they kind of look alike and both wear the same shade of blue. They’re different people, at different points in their career.
quote:

The players wanted Robinson


Accurate. Spoke to one of the starters this week off the record and that is what he indicated the climate was. He wouldn’t spill anything though.

Ross has gone on record saying they’re wanting someone who is a sitting head coach. I doubt it ends up being Robinson
I see the point you are attempting, but you have a few glaring lapses in logic and broken general persuasive rules of engagement, this whole post should be disregarded.

re: LSU should easily beat A&M

Posted by Flying DeLorean on 11/20/23 at 3:12 pm
quote:

People really think one team will flat out dominate the other?


Anyone who is certain it will be a blowout is letting their own program prejudice do the talking for them and they’re abandoning rationality entirely. Yes it COULD be a blowout, but nobody should reasonably be predicting one

re: Most likely upset this week

Posted by Flying DeLorean on 11/20/23 at 2:30 pm
Jumping out as most likely to me would be the Arkansas/Mizzou game. Second would be the FLA/FSU game.

I would call those my pick for most likely to be upset. If I were to bet on either I’d bet with the favorite.