Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:70
Registered on:8/10/2021
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
[quote]This is one of them. A&M brought in $279MM in operating revenue. [/quote] As mentioned, its like $50MM lower than that due to made up “revenue” like a $12MM internal loan and a capital campaign. Anyway interesting Ohio state edges texas w $44MM less fball rev....
On another forum they said it was based on ATM putting a line item in the agreement around retaining NIL rights even if they leave....

re: Saban Retirement Rumor

Posted by UThomas on 1/18/24 at 11:24 am
[quote]I believe 100 percent this happened.. But NCAA isn't going down the road to seize players phone records and after the Freeze issue at OM... If coaches are using school phones... Then they are just stupid. So color me shocked if anything happens [/quote] Would be pretty ballsy for Alabama ...
Could go either way? On the on hand he has a kid and is getting good projections. On the other his family is loaded + whatever NIL would be in play. So prob less a no brainer than 3 years ago...
[quote]Last year we had 10 4*s on the roster at OL. tu had 7 plus 2 5*. Pretty similar.[/quote] Well, you're the only one talking about Texas here, but their starting line for 2023 had a SR, JR, JR, and 2 5 start So on it - and So and RS-Fr filling out the 2 deep. Next year they will likely have...
[quote]This just reflects your general lack of knowledge about our program. The line talent is there.[/quote] More like yours. Lets see that 2 deep currently and their recruiting composite. ATM is paper thin there. [quote]And which QB has concussion concerns? Connor Weigman had a right foot ...
Interesting hire given the narrative around Jimbos offense being too slow and plodding. How is his offense going to work with the talent on hand anytime soon - aka a glass QB and a terrible OLine? They also just lost their good TE; he likes to run 2 TE sets and had a line full of RS-SR's. And...

re: A&M to hire Mike Elko

Posted by UThomas on 11/26/23 at 4:15 pm
Bringing Santucci back would be great…...

re: Friday we're all Texas Tech fans

Posted by UThomas on 11/22/23 at 6:29 pm
Unlikely. At home for the horns on Sr day, and tech has a ton of starters on d injured...
[quote]Are you actually saying this was a dirty hit? Especially in 2009. [/quote] Prob referring to the hit where Aggie Kellen heard hit him after and int was blown dead and he was taking off his helmet in 06 or 07...
[quote]They processed 2 5 star QB’s in Swoops and Hurd.[/quote] You may want to recheck sumlin/aggies recruiting record during that time...
[quote]I feel like at some point you or your kids must have applied to A&M and been rejected. You seem obsessed with bad mouthing the school. You're giving off psycho ex-girlfriend vibes.[/quote] I'm sorry debunking your anecdotal experience and church conversations with widely accessible and bas...
[quote]I can promise you A&M doesn’t have 23k or 28k in applicants. It’s much higher.[/quote] Right. Those were published stats from 2011. 10 years later it was 42k. I.e. showing that UT was much harder to get into still before the 6% thing. As it was before the 10% thing. It also one reas...
Oh - I thought you said your kid was going to go there for school... so you only care which is a safer city, not campus. Cool. And to be clear, you started your church story with: [quote]"The only reason Texas is harder to get into currently is because"[/quote] Which is not true....
[quote]Where are you getting your “published” stats?[/quote] [link=(https://reportcenter.highered.texas.gov/agency-publication/almanac/2021-texas-public-higher-education-almanac/)]Texas Public Higher Education Almanac (published yearly)[/link] I'll take that over a conversation at Church that ...
Its interesting indeed, but in case anyone is wondering if this disparity the OP is claiming is new, here are the published stats from almost 15 years ago (you know, before guys in church were sharing that Austin ran out of space and A&M HAD to grow, or that Texas is only now more selective because ...
[quote]quote: Interestingly, Tech has a slightly lower acceptance rate than A&M. But much lower scores of those accepted... And what does that tell you?[/quote] That A&M fans should spend much more time dunking on Tech than acting like A&M is academic (or sports) peers with UT Austin? [q...
[quote]Texas A&M is one of the easier ones to get into but if I am not mistaken no qualified in state student ever gets turned down in Lubbock...[/quote] Interestingly, Tech has a slightly lower acceptance rate than A&M. But much lower scores of those accepted......
[quote]Pretty much need to be in top 10 percent of your class… in areas like katy and woodlands you will have to be in a lot of honors classes and have above a 4.0…[/quote] Except you don't. Here are two schools, tell me if you think one is "much easier" to get into than the other: School A: ...
Re-read what I said. The statement was not "is Texas A&M referred to as a tier 1 flagship university" (I think California has half a dozen plus with that designation), its "is Texas pursuing a dual flagship STRATEGY" - i.e. treating them coequal. They are not. The funding, incoming student charac...