Favorite team:Texas A&M 
Location:College Station, TX
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:912
Registered on:7/22/2021
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Agree to disagree.

99% of Repubs will not cross the line on certain issues, abortion being one of them.

So no, this didn't happen.
The idea that Republicans are mad at Senate Republicans enough so to cross the isle and vote for the pro-trans-child Talafreako is laughable.

Even in the worst situations, Republicans are voting for Republicans.

Sorry, this narrative is bogus.
Here's a 'recent' link:

Only 6.8M counted

Something doesn't make sense.

Here's another source showing 7.8M early votes

Something fricky is going on
Help me understand the Texas situation.

7.8 Million early voters in Texas

Yet, the numbers say:



Where in the hell are the remaining votes?

Is this Arizona called early again?
Clearly, tDecline started when AM was not allowed to laugh about AI generated memes in press conferences.
quote:

Can't wait for the FUTILITY BOWL @ Kyle Field when 7-4 Texas visits 5-6 A&M.


It will be the 2026 Cripple Fight
quote:

I am not looking forward to this game. I'll be surprised if we get out of Austin with a W


If we're all lucky, ESPN will shout 'TEXAS IS BACK, BABY!'
Arch Manning puts the AM in Texas.

Wow, how have I never thought of this before?

Texas A&M > Texas AM though
We can all agree that Notre Dame sucks.
Dang.


Here.

(props given in other thread as well)

re: Short of expulsion

Posted by CoachFranWasHere on 9/3/26 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

That's what all of the alters say.


And my first name is not Dennis.
quote:

The OPs number of posts since 2021 screams ALTER..... but i guess these idiots need to feel relevant.


Some of us just have a lower post count. I'm not an ALTER
quote:

So jeans in Iran are $8?


From that graphic, yep!

And insulin is ~$4.50 a dose

So if he had planted his feet, and fallen with his toes inbound, and the ball moved, it would've been incomplete?
quote:

Yes


What makes it a catch?
Not sour grapes, just confused by what appears to be a bad ruling.

NCAA rules seem to state:

"In American college football (NCAA), a player must maintain complete and continuous control of the ball throughout the entire process of contacting the ground, even if they are going out of bounds.

According to NCAA Rule 2-4-3, if a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass (with or without contact), they must maintain control during the process of contacting the ground. This stipulation applies whether the player is in the field of play or in the end zone, and specifically for a player attempting to make a catch at the sideline and going to the ground out of bounds.

Key nuances include:

Loss of Control: If the player loses control of the ball and it touches the ground before they regain control, it is not a catch.
Regaining Control: If the player loses control but regains it inbounds prior to the ball touching the ground, it is a catch.
Simultaneous Loss: If the player loses control while simultaneously touching the ground with any part of their body (other than feet), or if there is doubt that the acts were simultaneous, it is not a catch.
Ground Contact: A slight movement of the ball, even if it touches the ground, will not be considered a loss of possession if the player maintains control; the player must actually lose control for it to be ruled a loss of possession. "

TAMU - UT 2024

The ball is moving before contact with the ground, during contact with the ground, and appears to have been lost after contact with the ground. This portion of the play was not reviewed. Foot position inside the endzone was the focus. See 48:53 for the most obvious movement.

I thought that any juggling of the ball out of bounds ruled it incomplete?

I know some hard-left, decades old, Democrats. They love MSNow, CNN, all the normal drivel.

They hate the DSAs and are questioning how to vote this fall.