Favorite team:Texas A&M 
Location:Austin, TX
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:689
Registered on:7/22/2021
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Back to top
Here are the teams that Texas A&M (#1 in the SEC) has not played:

#2 Alabama
#3 Georgia
#4 Ole Miss
#5 Texas
#6 Vanderbilt
#7 Oklahoma
#8 Tennessee


Here's another instance of "A&M dodged Vandy"!

Are you for real? Seriously?

Smells like bitch in here. :)
quote:

I'm old so I remember Aggie going crazy when they stole Fran. According to them, this was the sign that they had arrived and Bama was dead. They didn't factor in that everyone hated Fran & he hated us. He made up some bullshite about Bama lying to him about the sanctions and ended up dragging Aggie into the depths of hell.


Yup. It was pure hubris. Meant to shock the college football world.

*sigh*

When you see my username, just picture this:


re: A&M's schedule

Posted by CoachFranWasHere on 11/10/25 at 7:58 am to
"A&M dodged Vandy"
quote:

You get the bat signal? I chuckled.


Something like that!
Yes, we were so very clever, stealing Fran from you. A payback for Bama taking a few coaches away from us.

Joke is still on us :(
I don't give cougar hunting secrets away for free. You can sign up for the Coach Fran newsletter though.

re: Arch Data...facts

Posted by CoachFranWasHere on 11/3/25 at 8:32 am to
Texas, literally the best ever.

The 2025 Pre-Season DEI Ranked #1 College Football team

quote:

Goodness.

And someone downvoted that poor girl.


Must've been a T man, cause dat A is spectacular.
This is better than the Q Drop thread
This is the weirdest melt.
To be honest, considering that A&M and LSU are responsible for the OT rules change, that's just kinda badass.

re: Question for LSU baws

Posted by CoachFranWasHere on 10/24/25 at 3:59 pm to
Do the players want BK?

Could they sandbag and ensure BK's demise?
I want it to be:

A&M 35
LSU 10

It's going to be:

A&M 24
LSU 17

re: What does Texas do with Arch

Posted by CoachFranWasHere on 10/20/25 at 10:38 am to
This does beg the question. Lots of assumptions below. Just spitballin'

Supposing Arch is playing because Sark is being directed to play him . .

Does this also imply Sark is protected from any fallout if Arch continues to underdeliver?

I think for optics, it doesn't. Sark might have his neck on the chopping block without any protection.

Regardless of the case, Sark should be coaching his arse off, tailoring the offense around Arch's strengths and improving his weaknesses.

I doubt we will ever know the complete story. Probably a few dollars involved.

Arch seems like a good kid.

Hope the steers continue to lose.
That was a nice 2pt conversion